The DOI matches its Crossref record; 299 of the 299 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Abstract
The widespread implementation of algorithmic technologies in organizations prompts questions about how algorithms may reshape organizational control. We use Edwards’ (1979) perspective of “contested terrain,” wherein managers implement production technologies to maximize the value of labor and workers resist, to synthesize the interdisciplinary research on algorithms at work. We find that algorithmic control in the workplace operates through six main mechanisms, which we call the “6 Rs”—employers can use algorithms to direct workers by restricting and recommending, evaluate workers by recording and rating, and discipline workers by replacing and rewarding. We also discuss several key insights regarding algorithmic control. First, labor process theory helps to highlight potential problems with the largely positive view of algorithms at work. Second, the technical capabilities of algorithmic systems facilitate a form of rational control that is distinct from the technical and bureaucratic control used by employers for the past century. Third, employers’ use of algorithms is sparking the development of new algorithmic occupations. Finally, workers are individually and collectively resisting algorithmic control through a set of emerging tactics we call algoactivism. These insights sketch the contested terrain of algorithmic control and map critical areas for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For advertisers, algorithmic ad delivery creates uncertainty about the targets they reach and more generally reduces their control over the output of their actions (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Understanding that algorithmic systems are socially constructed and embedded in existing power dynamics also means these systems are neither created nor function outside the biases rooted in the organizational cultures within which they are implemented (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“However, the use of advanced algorithms cre-ates new opportunities for managers to exercise control over the workforce (Kellogg et al., 2020; Shapiro, 2018).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Different from traditional staffing agencies, digital labor platforms manage gig workers via algorithmic management (Kellogg et al., 2020;McDonnell et al., 2021).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Indeed, gig workers' customer evaluations not only serve as surrogates for their performance ratings but also affect the likelihood of their future orders (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Management scholars have therefore provided very little insight into AI during the last two decades (Kellogg, Valentine, & Christin, 2020;Lindebaum, Vesa, & den Hond, 2020).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg, Valentine, & Christin, 2020
In the citing paper
“Whenever the key actors of an organization negotiate who is authorized (4.1 & 4.3) to modify the AI system and to what extent modification is to be undertaken, dimensions of power and control are on the table (Kellogg et al. 2020;Ren 2019;Vallas and Hill 2012).”
From Keeping the organization in the loop: a socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“First, we identify six management functions that algorithms are currently able to perform: monitoring, goal setting, performance management, scheduling, compensation, and job termination.”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“However, recent reviews and conceptualizations (Kellogg et al., 2019;Mateescu & Nguyen, 2019a;Schafheitle et al., 2020) consider algorithmic management as a technological phenomenon that is not contingent on the type of organization and can be found in a large array of work contexts.”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Algorithmic control of platforms is used to control the behaviour of users on platforms to achieve the platform owners’ corporate objectives”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Other studies have found that content creators are ‘leveraging algorithms’ (Kellogg et al. 2020, p. 391) and ‘working around the algorithm’ (Curchod et al. 2020, p. 17) by constantly uploading (Arriagada and Ibáñez 2020), A/B testing (Cotter 2019), and diversifying their incomes (Cutolo and Kenney 2021).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Thus, they focus on content and topics that have delivered good key figures in the past, similar to algorithmic rewarding (Kellogg et al. 2020).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Previous literature has already identified A/B testing (Cotter 2019), algorithmic gossip (Bishop 2019), and leveraging algorithms (Kellogg et al. 2020) as coping mechanisms.”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Empirical research shows that freelance platform workers respond to algorithmic control by gaming and at times, sabotaging algorithms to (re)gain control (Gandini, 2019;Kellogg et al., 2020;Newlands, 2020;Veen et al., 2020).”
From Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“This is the contested-terrain dynamic that the algorithmic management literature describes, deployed in a firm with no specialist function to contest it [21].”
From Borrowed Competence: When AI-Driven HR Builds Startups’ People Capability and When It Hollows It Out (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The lack of transparency in algorithmic decision-making has been associated with dynamics of control, power, and surveillance (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Algorithmic management might perpetuate societal biases and reproduce discriminatory practices at work, whether the discrimination is built into the algorithms, or management's use of the algorithm, or as a result of customer's rating of workers (Noble 2018;Benjamin 2019;Kellogg et al. 2020;Akter et al. 2021;Zajko 2021;Heinrichs 2022).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Salomon-Delatour, G., Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1948) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086579 · Cited by 11,302
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Wing, J. M. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215 · Cited by 8,102
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Poggi, G. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300342 · Cited by 6,851
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
The Principles of Scientific Management.
Woolf, L. S., Taylor, F. W., Scott, W. D., & Goldmark, J. C. (1912) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2221959 · Cited by 5,254
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 94
- Ahmed S. I., 2016, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Aloisi A., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 653
- Autor D. H., 2015, Performance and progress: Essays on capitalism, business and society
- Bailey D., 2019, Academy of Management
- Barocas S., 2016, California Law Review, 104, 671
- Berente N., 2014, Stakeholders, and Measurement (March 26, 2014)
- Beunza D., 2015, Systemic Risk Center
- Bodie M. T., 2017, University of Colorado Law Review, 88, 961
- Borch C., 2016, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 283
- Boyle E., 2018, Understanding latent style, Multithreaded
- Bradley A., 2019, Building our centralized experimental platform, Multithreaded, 2019
- Brayne S., Social Problems
- Brockman J., 2019, Possible minds: Twenty-five ways of looking at AI
- Burawoy M., 1985, The politics of production: Factory regimes under capitalism and socialism
- Calo R., 2017, Columbia Law Review, 117, 1623
- Cameron L., 2018, Academy of Management Annual Meeting
- Cameron L., 2019, 9th Biennial Positive Organizational Scholarship Conference
- Campbell H., 2018, The rideshare guy: A blog and podcast for rideshare drivers
- Chalmers M., 2003, Workshop at the Crossroads: The interaction of HCI and Systems Issues in UbiComp
- Cherry M. A., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 577
- Christin A., 2017, Big Data & Society, Big Data & Society, 4, 1
- Christin A., 2019, International Journal of Communication
- Colner E., 2018, Three years of erch engineering, Multithreaded
- Common M., 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal
- Corporaal G. F., 2017, Platform sourcing–How fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms
- Corporaal G. F., 2019, Reshaping Work Conference
- Crawford K., 2014, Boston College Law Review, 55, 93
- Curchod C., 2019, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1
- Davenport T. H., 2016, Only humans need apply: winners and losers in the age of smart machines
- Davidson A., 2016, The future Of work looks like a UPS truck
- De Stefano V., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 471
- Deterding S., 2011, CHI 2011 gamification workshop proceedings
- Diakopoulos N., 2016, MIT Technology Review, 17, 2016
- Feller A., 2016, The Washington Post
- Felstiner A., 2011, Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 32, 143
- Fourcade M., 2016, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 9
- Glynn P., 2018, Your client engagement program isn’t doing what you think it is, MultiThreaded
- Gomez-Uribe C. A., 2016, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 6, 13
- Gupta A., 2018, Crisis Text Line Blog, 2019
- Hall J. V., 2019, Pricing efficiently in designed markets: The case of ride-sharing
- Haraszti M., 1978, A worker in a worker’s state
- Howe J., 2006, Wired Magazine, 14, 1
- Jackson S. R., 2019, MIT Economic Sociology Working Group
- Karunakaran A., 2019, 35th European Group for Organizational Studies pre-colloquium
- Kaynak F. E., 2019, Bootcamps: A new path for occupational entry
- Kellogg K., 2018, Oxford Professional Services Conference
- Kellogg K., Organization Science
- Kessinger R., 2019, MIT Economic Sociology Working Group Seminar
- Kochan T. A., 2019, ILR Review, 72, 3
- Landay J., 2019, Smart interfaces for human-centered AI
- Lanier J., 2018, Harvard Business Review
- Lebovitz S., 2019, Doubting the diagnosis: How artificial intelligence increases ambiguity during professional decision making
- Leonardi P., 2018, Harvard Business Review, 96, 70
- Levy K., 2017, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 32, 1183
- Levy K., 2018, International Journal of Communication, 12, 23
- Liu Y.-E., 2014, EDM
- Lix K., 2019, Expressly different: Interpretive diversity and team performance
- Lix K., 2019, Kharma scores and team learning in software development gigs
- McClelland M., 2012, Mother Jones
- Mindell D. A., 2015, Our robots, ourselves: Robotics and the myths of autonomy
- Mollick E. R., 2014, The Wharton School research paper series
- Myers J., 2019, An Expanded Role for State Actors: Coordinating Workforce Intermediation Across Multiple Geographies and Industries in Four U.S. States
- Nikolaidis S., 2012, Human-robot teaming using shared mental models
- O’Connor S., 2015, Financial Times, 8
- Pasquale F., 2015, The Hedgehog Review, 17, 30
- Pine K. H., 2016, Conference 2016 Proceedings
- Rahman H., 2017, Reputational ploys: Reputation and ratings in online labor markets
- Rahman H., 2019, From iron cages to invisible cages: Algorithmic evaluations in online labor markets
- Rahman H., 2019, How client managers restrain control to keep control: Evidence from technologically-mediated ‘Gigs’
- Ramsay R. A., 1966, Managers and men: Adventures in industry
- Ranganathan A., 2017, Academy of Management
- Raval N., 2016, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
- Rosenblat A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758
- Sachon M., 2017, KUKA: Planning for the future of automation
- Salehi N., 2015, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Scheiber N., 2017, The New York Times, 2
- Scholz T., 2016, Challenging the corporate sharing economy
- Schwartz D., 2018, Work and Occupations, 45, 247, 10.1177/0730888418762263 · DOI
- Segal L., 2014, The decoded company: Know your talent better than you know your customers
- Stanculescu L. C., 2016, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 346
- Sundararajan A., 2016, The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism
- Tabrizi B. N., 2019, Harvard Business Review, 13
- Thorp A. A., 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 1
- Truelove E., 2019, Integrating the crowd into the firm production process: The critical role of guided mobilization
- Valentine M., 2019, Algorithms and the org chart
- Vancil R. F., 1982, Implementing strategy: The role of top management
- Waardenburg L., 2018, 34th European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium: Surprise in and around Organizations: Journeys to the Unexpected
- Walz S. P., 2014, The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications
- Whyte W. H., 1956, The organization man
- Wilson H. J., 2017, Mit Sloan Management Review
- Winner L., 1980, Daedalus, 109, 121
- Wood A., 2019, SASE
- Zhou S., 2018, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1
- Zhou S., 2018, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,401–2,500 of 2,755
Xiu, J., Li, Q., Zu, X., & Zhang, Q. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107649
AI Perception, Work Changes, and Readiness for Change in Organizations: A Cross-Sector Study
Marković, B., Mandić, A., & Blaži, J. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091089
Digital Transformation of Workforce and Scheduling Systems: Advances and Future Directions
Okwesa, I. J., Oyesiji, S. O., Abdulmalik, A. U., & Unamma, U. M.-L. (2023) · Shodhshauryam International Scientific Refereed Research Journal · doi:10.32628/shisrrj247104
Li, Y., & Cheng, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1871662
Krasteva-Hristova, R. (2026) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm19090675
Zhang, J., Cheng, B., Peng, Y., Tian, J., & Chen, M. (2026) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2026.103125
Decision substitution and the reorganisation of judgement in AI-mediated society
Ibitoye, A., Ajenifuja, O. F., Kareem, R. S. A., Adeyemo, D. D., & Famutimi, R. F. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03349-3
Valestrand, E. T. (2026) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1017560
Aponte-López, A. C. (2026) · Región Científica · doi:10.58763/rc2026589
Haro-Sarango, A., Cachay-Salcedo, S., Saavedra-Vasconez, J., Salcedo-Dávalos, R., & Sotelo-Castro, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2026.1924815
The dual effects of digitalization on SMEs: export gains and learning losses
Gomes, E., Lehman, D. W., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2026) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-026-00879-2
Invisible gains: how resistance contests the promised social benefits of generative AI in SMEs
Ramírez, A. (2026) · Journal of Social Impact in Business Research · doi:10.1108/jsibr-04-2025-0038
Fix, K. T. (2026) · Phoenix Scholar · doi:10.64657/wnor7323
Feng, Y., Waley, P., & Shen, J. W. (2026) · Population Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.70362
Lan, Y., Liu, S., Chen, J., & Xie, H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7411384
Governance in Global Sharing Economy Platforms: A Transaction Cost Perspective
Ganesan, S., Rindfleisch, A., & Lahiri, A. (2026) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1177/1069031x261487172
Algorithmic aspirations: Returning graduates and rural platform labor in China
Zhang, H. (2026) · Platforms & Society · doi:10.1177/29768624261486154
Popovič, A. (2026) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2026.2727547
A Systems-Level Framework for Autonomy, Trust, and Workforce Engagement in AI-Enabled Organizations
Beitsayadeh, C., & Darbyshire, P. E. (2026) · Phoenix Scholar · doi:10.64657/myjw1762
Beyond efficiency: epistemic well-being at work under algorithmic governance
Salazar-Altamirano, M. A., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03351-9 · Cited by 1
Parker, S. H. S., & Leonardi, P. M. (2026) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392261464889
Organizational design for digital transformation: A systematic literature review
Thome, T., Hanisch, M., Oehmichen, J., & de Faria, P. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116508
Khalil, A., Fathy, S., Adel, M., Nabil, H., & Mostafa, R. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/h561691048
Rahman, H., & Mahmood, T. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/n475272253
Who gets to negotiate? Tracing gender gaps in structural empowerment with people analytics
Shwan, S., Boon, C. T., Hartog, D. N. D., & Hentschel, T. (2026) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102451
Bello, A., Musa, I., & Sule, Z. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/r169904846
Dupuis, C., & Perrin, H. (2026) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/o218375755
Ricci, P., Luca, M. D., Ferraro, G., & Russo, A. (2023) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/s266538595
Johnson, E., Smith, R. P., Brown, L., & Miller, K. (2024) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/a819793285
Ortega, C., Molina, D., Perez, A., & Soto, V. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/i549347816
Meyer, L., Schmid, A., & Braun, S. (2021) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/b612104463
Papadopoulos, G., & Georgiou, E. (2023) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/l183869071
Weber, T., & Müller, H. (2026) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/j013673270
Andersen, L., Nielsen, F., & Sørensen, M. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/u457525886
Nakamura, H., & Kato, Y. (2022) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/t244799637
Schneider, N., & Frank, T. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/h568551336
Yamamoto, Y., & Ito, K. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/a806805359
Nowak, K., Wrobel, T., & Mazur, J. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/d590205709
Jensen, T., & Hansen, M. (2025) · Journal of Digital Business and Management Studies · doi:10.68159/e912534934
Baik, S., Yoon, Y. H., Jo, S. J., Choi, H., & Kang, S. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091116
Who becomes replaceable? Generative AI and the discursive stratification of workPreprint
Kim, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10164537/v1
Jahan, U., Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Bhat, M. A. (2026) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.1177/01672533261484231
Imagining and Enacting Futures: The Anticipatory Politics of Algorithmic Governance
Chan, N. K., Su, C. C., & Zhou, R. (2026) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70249
How States govern platform work: An evaluation of regulatory approaches in Latin America
Zorzoli, L. (2026) · International Labour Review · doi:10.16995/ilr.26783
Liu, X., Wang, Y., Zheng, H., & Chen, Y. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0357097
Competing strain and resource pathways linking AI-enabled work systems to employee wellbeing
Sathish, A. S., & Indradevi, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1922774
Zhu, H., & Shao, Q. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14091123 · Cited by 1
Tsaban, S. (2026) · Journal of Banking Regulation · doi:10.1057/s41261-026-00356-8
Platform Kapitalizmi: Dijital İletişimin Tecimselleşmesi
Akgün, A. C. (2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1418.c5716
Li, C., & Xing, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1774556
Zelles, T., Pap, J., & Makó, C. (2026) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci16090437
Digital Labor Platforms, Migration Governance, and Labor Market Inequality in the Mediterranean
Demirtaş, Ş. C. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0640-5.ch006
Tenakwah, E. J., Otchere‐Ankrah, B., & Tenakwah, E. S. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.71519
Nilsén, P., Hald, K., & Neher, M. (2026) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-026-01103-w
Feng, F. X., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Chen, J. S., & Geng, M. (2026) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-12-2025-0537
Wu, X., Li, Y., Wang, R., & Hai, M. (2026) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70112
Yang, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1864238
Abubakar, N., Beverla, E., Ogbodo, E. T., & Tope-Ogunrinde, T. (2026) · doi:10.69739/jsdl.v1i1.2336
Bodunrin, S., Titus, O. F., & Aluko, H. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7451460
Workplace adoption of wearable devices: insights into Greek employees’ intentions and usage trends
Vasilidou, M., Diamantidis, A. D., Ioakeimidou, D., Kansizoglou, I., Symeonidis, S., Chatzoglou, P., & Gasteratos, A. C. (2026) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-09-2025-0450
Diamond, L. M., & Oppermann, M. (2026) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/3822301.3822332
Zhong, H., Tan, H., Dong, T., & Chen, Y. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18189416
Human-Centred AI Workforce Transformation
Cajnko, P., & Šprajc, P. (2026) · doi:10.18690/um.fov.8.2026
Zhang, L., Yang, N., Kühner, S., & Li, H. (2026) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2026.2731370
Louadi, M. E., & Kallel, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01341-7
Algorithmic identity regulation in the platform-based gig work of Indian food delivery workers
Bisht, N. S., Trusson, C., & Tripathy, A. K. (2026) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267261480593
Kim, B., & Kim, M. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103553
Zhou, C.-C., & Zhou, M.-P. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 3rd Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area International Conference on Digital Economy and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3837873.3838058
The Alignment Paradox: A Theory of AI ‐Driven Misalignment in HR Systems
Patel, P. C., Rofcanın, Y., Kamaşak, R., & Belitski, M. (2026) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70099
Wu, X., & Song, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1848261
Guillard, A. (2026) · Question(s) de management · doi:10.3917/qdm.240.0087
Zhou, C., Li, F., & Gao, X. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18189513
Responsible AI beyond compliance: governing everyday use in the public sector
Jonathan, G. M. (2026) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-06-2026-0318
Chi, M., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2025-0950
Ideology by Alphabet: Option Order and the Measurement of Machine Political PreferencesPreprint
Olah, T., Erdey, L., Tőkés, T., & Nádasi, L. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11063104/v1
Human-Centered Leadership in the Age of AI and Automation
Tariq, M. U. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5509-2.ch004
Agency in the Loop: The AI Revolution and the Philosophy of Management
Eabrasu, M., Bauman, D. C., Bergier, H., & Murtinu, S. (2026) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.1007/s40926-026-00409-y
Lin, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2026) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-11-2025-0932
Managing AI-led and AI-generated Processes: Reframing Organizational Change When AI Drives Change
Schwarz, G. M., Holten, A., & Fredberg, T. (2026) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/00218863261488502
Editorial: Reimagining roles and identity in the era of human - AI collaboration, volume II
Chen, X., Wen, I., Qu, Q., & Chen, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1965573
Miklošík, A., & Rosenbaum, T. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01344-4
Artificial Intelligence and Women's Inclusion in HRM
Ghosh, A., Mondal, P., & Choudhary, K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7370-6.ch002
When AI Coaching Becomes a Change Agent: From Micro Interventions to Emergent Organizational Change
Terblanche, N. H. D. (2026) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/00218863261488991
Han, S., Linfeng, S. H. E. N., & Tang, W. (2026) · Chinese Sociological Review · doi:10.1080/21620555.2026.2733334
Ali, A., Bahadur, W., Liu, L., & Tariq, H. (2026) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-08-2025-1288
Vershinina, N. A., MacKenzie, C. A., Bastian, B. L., & Wood, B. P. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70261
Fridayani, H. D. (2026) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.2026.2732526
Driven by AI: the influence of multiple factors on employee innovation behavior
Yang, Y., Xi, G., Zhang, L., Chen, Q., Lu, Q., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2026.2734762
Digital irresponsibility in the gig economy: insights from a mixed-methods study
Prentice, C., Gautam, N., & Zeidan, S. (2026) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-02-2026-0271
Borrowed Competence: When AI-Driven HR Builds Startups’ People Capability and When It Hollows It Out
Ben Oz, R., Granot, N., Tzabbar, D., & Tzafrir, S. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7489654
Affa, A. S., & Satrio, D. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103685
Yaralı, M. C. (2026) · Toplum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Dergisi · doi:10.58702/teyd.1878391
Jha, S. (2026) · Research in Hospitality Management · doi:10.1080/22243534.2026.2686364
AI anxiety, digital-life stress, and well-being: A gender-stratified network analysis
Yu, B., Sun, J., Zhang, Z., & Shi, J. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2026.102462
Manoli, A., Triantari, S., & Zervas, I. M. (2026) · Dia-noesis. · doi:10.12681/dia.46975
Stor, M., & Haromszeki, Ł. (2026) · Wroclaw University of Economics and Business eBooks · doi:10.15611/2026.71.5.09
From alienation to deficitization: the subjectivity predicament of digital laborers
Chu, Z., & Fan, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1890203
Tiwari, N., & Jain, V. (2026) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2026.2733411
Samardžija, J., & Drašković, N. (2025) · International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology (ICSET) · doi:10.1145/3802409.3802443
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Department of Communication Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 366-410
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2990520658
- Cited by
- 2,732
- References
- 284
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1145 · 2025: 477 · 2024: 350 · 2023: 288 · 2022: 247 · 2021: 175 · 2020: 48
- FWCI
- 237.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- algorithmic control, contested terrain, labour process theory, rational control, employee resistance, worker evaluation, worker discipline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
