The DOI matches its Crossref record; 298 of the 298 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Abstract
The widespread implementation of algorithmic technologies in organizations prompts questions about how algorithms may reshape organizational control. We use Edwards’ (1979) perspective of “contested terrain,” wherein managers implement production technologies to maximize the value of labor and workers resist, to synthesize the interdisciplinary research on algorithms at work. We find that algorithmic control in the workplace operates through six main mechanisms, which we call the “6 Rs”—employers can use algorithms to direct workers by restricting and recommending, evaluate workers by recording and rating, and discipline workers by replacing and rewarding. We also discuss several key insights regarding algorithmic control. First, labor process theory helps to highlight potential problems with the largely positive view of algorithms at work. Second, the technical capabilities of algorithmic systems facilitate a form of rational control that is distinct from the technical and bureaucratic control used by employers for the past century. Third, employers’ use of algorithms is sparking the development of new algorithmic occupations. Finally, workers are individually and collectively resisting algorithmic control through a set of emerging tactics we call algoactivism. These insights sketch the contested terrain of algorithmic control and map critical areas for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For advertisers, algorithmic ad delivery creates uncertainty about the targets they reach and more generally reduces their control over the output of their actions (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Understanding that algorithmic systems are socially constructed and embedded in existing power dynamics also means these systems are neither created nor function outside the biases rooted in the organizational cultures within which they are implemented (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“However, the use of advanced algorithms cre-ates new opportunities for managers to exercise control over the workforce (Kellogg et al., 2020; Shapiro, 2018).”
From Algorithmic management in a work context (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Different from traditional staffing agencies, digital labor platforms manage gig workers via algorithmic management (Kellogg et al., 2020;McDonnell et al., 2021).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Indeed, gig workers' customer evaluations not only serve as surrogates for their performance ratings but also affect the likelihood of their future orders (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Management scholars have therefore provided very little insight into AI during the last two decades (Kellogg, Valentine, & Christin, 2020;Lindebaum, Vesa, & den Hond, 2020).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg, Valentine, & Christin, 2020
In the citing paper
“Whenever the key actors of an organization negotiate who is authorized (4.1 & 4.3) to modify the AI system and to what extent modification is to be undertaken, dimensions of power and control are on the table (Kellogg et al. 2020;Ren 2019;Vallas and Hill 2012).”
From Keeping the organization in the loop: a socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“First, we identify six management functions that algorithms are currently able to perform: monitoring, goal setting, performance management, scheduling, compensation, and job termination.”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“However, recent reviews and conceptualizations (Kellogg et al., 2019;Mateescu & Nguyen, 2019a;Schafheitle et al., 2020) consider algorithmic management as a technological phenomenon that is not contingent on the type of organization and can be found in a large array of work contexts.”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“Algorithmic control of platforms is used to control the behaviour of users on platforms to achieve the platform owners’ corporate objectives”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Other studies have found that content creators are ‘leveraging algorithms’ (Kellogg et al. 2020, p. 391) and ‘working around the algorithm’ (Curchod et al. 2020, p. 17) by constantly uploading (Arriagada and Ibáñez 2020), A/B testing (Cotter 2019), and diversifying their incomes (Cutolo and Kenney 2021).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Thus, they focus on content and topics that have delivered good key figures in the past, similar to algorithmic rewarding (Kellogg et al. 2020).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Previous literature has already identified A/B testing (Cotter 2019), algorithmic gossip (Bishop 2019), and leveraging algorithms (Kellogg et al. 2020) as coping mechanisms.”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“Empirical research shows that freelance platform workers respond to algorithmic control by gaming and at times, sabotaging algorithms to (re)gain control (Gandini, 2019;Kellogg et al., 2020;Newlands, 2020;Veen et al., 2020).”
From Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM (2021) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“This is the contested-terrain dynamic that the algorithmic management literature describes, deployed in a firm with no specialist function to contest it [21].”
From Borrowed Competence: When AI-Driven HR Builds Startups’ People Capability and When It Hollows It Out (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The lack of transparency in algorithmic decision-making has been associated with dynamics of control, power, and surveillance (Kellogg et al., 2020).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Algorithmic management might perpetuate societal biases and reproduce discriminatory practices at work, whether the discrimination is built into the algorithms, or management's use of the algorithm, or as a result of customer's rating of workers (Noble 2018;Benjamin 2019;Kellogg et al. 2020;Akter et al. 2021;Zajko 2021;Heinrichs 2022).”
From Artificial intelligence and work: a critical review of recent research from the social sciences (2024) · cites this paper as Kellogg et al. 2020
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.
Salomon-Delatour, G., Weber, M., Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T. (1948) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086579 · Cited by 11,302
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Wing, J. M. (2006) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215 · Cited by 8,102
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Poggi, G. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300342 · Cited by 6,851
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
The Principles of Scientific Management.
Woolf, L. S., Taylor, F. W., Scott, W. D., & Goldmark, J. C. (1912) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2221959 · Cited by 5,254
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 95
- Ahmed S. I., 2016, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Aloisi A., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 653
- Autor D. H., 2015, Performance and progress: Essays on capitalism, business and society
- Bailey D., 2019, Academy of Management
- Barocas S., 2016, California Law Review, 104, 671
- Berente N., 2014, Stakeholders, and Measurement (March 26, 2014)
- Beunza D., 2015, Systemic Risk Center
- Bodie M. T., 2017, University of Colorado Law Review, 88, 961
- Borch C., 2016, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 283
- Boyle E., 2018, Understanding latent style, Multithreaded
- Bradley A., 2019, Building our centralized experimental platform, Multithreaded, 2019
- Brayne S., Social Problems
- Brockman J., 2019, Possible minds: Twenty-five ways of looking at AI
- Burawoy M., 1985, The politics of production: Factory regimes under capitalism and socialism
- Calo R., 2017, Columbia Law Review, 117, 1623
- Cameron L., 2018, Academy of Management Annual Meeting
- Cameron L., 2019, 9th Biennial Positive Organizational Scholarship Conference
- Campbell H., 2018, The rideshare guy: A blog and podcast for rideshare drivers
- Chai S., 2018, Academy of Management Proceedings
- Chalmers M., 2003, Workshop at the Crossroads: The interaction of HCI and Systems Issues in UbiComp
- Cherry M. A., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 577
- Christin A., 2017, Big Data & Society, Big Data & Society, 4, 1
- Christin A., 2019, International Journal of Communication
- Colner E., 2018, Three years of erch engineering, Multithreaded
- Common M., 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal
- Corporaal G. F., 2017, Platform sourcing–How fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms
- Corporaal G. F., 2019, Reshaping Work Conference
- Crawford K., 2014, Boston College Law Review, 55, 93
- Curchod C., 2019, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1
- Davenport T. H., 2016, Only humans need apply: winners and losers in the age of smart machines
- Davidson A., 2016, The future Of work looks like a UPS truck
- De Stefano V., 2015, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 471
- Deterding S., 2011, CHI 2011 gamification workshop proceedings
- Diakopoulos N., 2016, MIT Technology Review, 17, 2016
- Feller A., 2016, The Washington Post
- Felstiner A., 2011, Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 32, 143
- Fourcade M., 2016, Socio-Economic Review, 15, 9
- Glynn P., 2018, Your client engagement program isn’t doing what you think it is, MultiThreaded
- Gomez-Uribe C. A., 2016, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 6, 13
- Gupta A., 2018, Crisis Text Line Blog, 2019
- Hall J. V., 2019, Pricing efficiently in designed markets: The case of ride-sharing
- Haraszti M., 1978, A worker in a worker’s state
- Howe J., 2006, Wired Magazine, 14, 1
- Jackson S. R., 2019, MIT Economic Sociology Working Group
- Karunakaran A., 2019, 35th European Group for Organizational Studies pre-colloquium
- Kaynak F. E., 2019, Bootcamps: A new path for occupational entry
- Kellogg K., 2018, Oxford Professional Services Conference
- Kellogg K., Organization Science
- Kessinger R., 2019, MIT Economic Sociology Working Group Seminar
- Kochan T. A., 2019, ILR Review, 72, 3
- Landay J., 2019, Smart interfaces for human-centered AI
- Lanier J., 2018, Harvard Business Review
- Lebovitz S., 2019, Doubting the diagnosis: How artificial intelligence increases ambiguity during professional decision making
- Leonardi P., 2018, Harvard Business Review, 96, 70
- Levy K., 2017, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 32, 1183
- Levy K., 2018, International Journal of Communication, 12, 23
- Liu Y.-E., 2014, EDM
- Lix K., 2019, Expressly different: Interpretive diversity and team performance
- Lix K., 2019, Kharma scores and team learning in software development gigs
- McClelland M., 2012, Mother Jones
- Mindell D. A., 2015, Our robots, ourselves: Robotics and the myths of autonomy
- Mollick E. R., 2014, The Wharton School research paper series
- Myers J., 2019, An Expanded Role for State Actors: Coordinating Workforce Intermediation Across Multiple Geographies and Industries in Four U.S. States
- Nikolaidis S., 2012, Human-robot teaming using shared mental models
- O’Connor S., 2015, Financial Times, 8
- Pasquale F., 2015, The Hedgehog Review, 17, 30
- Pine K. H., 2016, Conference 2016 Proceedings
- Rahman H., 2017, Reputational ploys: Reputation and ratings in online labor markets
- Rahman H., 2019, From iron cages to invisible cages: Algorithmic evaluations in online labor markets
- Rahman H., 2019, How client managers restrain control to keep control: Evidence from technologically-mediated ‘Gigs’
- Ramsay R. A., 1966, Managers and men: Adventures in industry
- Ranganathan A., 2017, Academy of Management
- Raval N., 2016, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
- Rosenblat A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758
- Sachon M., 2017, KUKA: Planning for the future of automation
- Salehi N., 2015, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Scheiber N., 2017, The New York Times, 2
- Scholz T., 2016, Challenging the corporate sharing economy
- Schwartz D., 2018, Work and Occupations, 45, 247, 10.1177/0730888418762263 · DOI
- Segal L., 2014, The decoded company: Know your talent better than you know your customers
- Stanculescu L. C., 2016, Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 346
- Sundararajan A., 2016, The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism
- Tabrizi B. N., 2019, Harvard Business Review, 13
- Thorp A. A., 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 1
- Truelove E., 2019, Integrating the crowd into the firm production process: The critical role of guided mobilization
- Valentine M., 2019, Algorithms and the org chart
- Vancil R. F., 1982, Implementing strategy: The role of top management
- Waardenburg L., 2018, 34th European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium: Surprise in and around Organizations: Journeys to the Unexpected
- Walz S. P., 2014, The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications
- Whyte W. H., 1956, The organization man
- Wilson H. J., 2017, Mit Sloan Management Review
- Winner L., 1980, Daedalus, 109, 121
- Wood A., 2019, SASE
- Zhou S., 2018, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1
- Zhou S., 2018, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,701–2,755 of 2,755
AI-Driven Competitive Advantage in Global Travel Platforms
Kant, S., Ray, B., & Debnath, A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0522-4.ch008
Bessala, J. P. B. (2026) · Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies · doi:10.4236/jhrss.2026.144025
Beyond Human–AI interaction: exploring the influence of AI anthropomorphism on work engagement
Ling, B., Xia, Y., & Cai, Y. (2026) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2025-0862
Kauttonen, J., Tuomi, A., Vuori, J., Saaranen, P., & Lahtinen, A. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2750593
Ethical and legal dimensions of crowdsourcing professional services: a critical literature review
Raimi, L., Mawad, J. L., & Shokunbi, M. O. (2026) · International Journal of Ethics and Systems · doi:10.1108/ijoes-01-2026-0054
Human-AI Collaboration in Travel and Tourism Enterprises
Dhand, S., Patnaik, P., Huzooree, G., Jeffery, D., & Kumar, N. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0522-4.ch014
Muvakit, S. (2026) · Çalışma ve Toplum · doi:10.54752/ct.1973941
Platform Strategy and the AI Ecosystem in Tourism Markets
Ray, B., Panwar, M., Vaishnav, D., & Agarwal, S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0522-4.ch009
Ojuok, A. (2026) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/26oct568
AI-AUGMENTED CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP
Margianto, A. (2026) · TEOLOGIS, RELEVAN, APLIKATIF, CENDIKIA, KONTEKSTUAL · doi:10.61660/track.v5i2.281
Wang, P., Jiang, C., Dong, X., Gao, T., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-10-2025-1741
Salem, M. A. (2026) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math14213885
Fonseca, F. (2026) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.70133
Teng, C., Tang, X., Liu, Z., & Deng, Z. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124935
Scaling Artificial Intelligence: Diffusion Speed and Enterprise-Size Polarisation Across Europe
Umoru, N. B., Umoru, K. E., Ishaku, P. K., Lawal, O. L., & Adefisan-Williams, A. A. (2026) · Strategic Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.sbr.2026.100318
The Efficiency Trap of Agentic AI in Human Resource Management
Yang, M. M.-H. (2026) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70106
Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Boards
Hruška, D. (2026) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia6110238
Perceived algorithmic control and courier safety risk in last-mile delivery: a transparency paradox
Lin, Y., Zhao, Q., & Chang, J. (2026) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-03-2026-0356
Ashraf, A., Min, Q., Ashraf, A., Arslan, H. M., & Zafar, H. (2026) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe16110169 · Cited by 1
AI in health care: from clinical support to algorithmic management?
Boyer, L., Ureña, R., Llorca, P., Sanchez, S., & Boussat, B. (2026) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105813
Platform-Mediated Migrant Entrepreneurship
Kiling, M. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1905-4.ch009
Dijital Taylorizm literatürünün bilimsel gelişimi: Bibliyometrik bir analiz
Köksal, Ö., & Akdemir, M. A. (2026) · Akademik Açı · doi:10.59597/akademikaci.1979525
Bekar, F. (2026) · Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.38057/bifd.1945318
Formal Randomness and Perceived Fairness in Workshop Work Order Allocation
Chen, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Management · doi:10.63313/fpm.9019
Harper, C., Jawara, J., Hernandez, T., Whitaker, N., Sawwan, M., Wood, D., Erete, S. L., Weight, E. A., Blue, M. N. M., Kerr, Z. Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3838843.3838857
Neogi, S., Mukherjee, S., & Verma, A. (2026) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2026.2751931
Cleofas, J. V. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70780
The Emotional Data Economy and the Rise of Emotion AI in Algorithmic Workforce Governance
Nosios, M., Boutsiouki, S., Oraiopoulou, C., & Κουτσουπιάς, Ν. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9469-5.ch009
Defining Industry 4.0 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Chester, L., & Potgieter, A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0393-0.ch001
Algorithmic HRM and freelancer capabilities in Sri Lanka: constraints and the role of social support
Rathnayake, N., Amankwaa, A., & Ayentimi, D. T. (2026) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2026-0356
Abylaikhanova, T., Domalatov, Y., Rakhmetulina, Z. B., Kenzhin, Z. B., Rakhmetulina, A., Bukhatova, A., & Narimbetova, A. (2026) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.24(4).2026.16
Ethics vs. Exhaustion: Ethical AI Design and Job Burnout in Takeout Platforms
Feng, N., Wang, X., Chen, A., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2026.104462
Wang, L., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Zhu, F., & Li, Y. (2026) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/jmenea.meeng-7545
Workflow-Governed Automated Validation of AI Agent Task Assignments in Microsoft Dynamics 365 ERP
Orosz, I., & Orosz, T. (2026) · Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics · doi:10.1109/sisy71351.2026.11738448
VIEIRA, T. A., & Mendonça, P. (2026) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x261496221
Yapay Zekâ Çağında Örgütsel Etik
Ülkü, T. (2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1573.c6459
A Three-Dimensional Resilience Computational Method for Analyzing Organizational System Resilience
Wang, H., Hu, B., Duan, Y., & Long, L. (2026) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2026.113778
Rašticová, M., Genkova, P., Przytuła, S., Іванівна, В. Н., Tkalenko, N. V., Šerá, E., & Stępczak, E. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83742-007-020261004
Vural, M. F. (2026) · Journal of Management Archive · doi:10.70877/joma.48
Cotter, K. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.001.0001
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.005.0001
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0006
Educational Bubbles and Algorithmic Workplaces: Shaping Competencies for AI-Driven HRM
Listopadzka, E., Prokopowicz, D., & Pandiella, A. V. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.10.219
What’s “critical” about critical algorithmic literacy
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0005
Situating algorithmic literacy
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0003
Schulte, P. A., Kander, M. C., Streit, J. M. K., Adamec, N. T., Wendt, C., Hartman, L. M., Bhattacharya, A., Lentz, T. J., Jacklitsch, B. L., Dean, J., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1999864
Philip, B., Mohan, R., Meena, A., Roopa, K., Thomas, A. A., & Eshwari, B. (2026) · SN Business & Economics · doi:10.1007/s43546-026-01544-4
Effects of AI use in HRM on HR professionals’ adaptive performance: a dual perspective
Registre, J. F. R., & Saba, T. (2026) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-026-01073-2
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0001
Astronaut Syndrome: Digital space and the production of psychosocial distress
Genaro, V. (2026) · Emotion, space and society · doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2026.101240
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0004
Cotter, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197809112.003.0002
Herzog, L. M., & Prestifilippo, A. L. (2026) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.70075
Zhou, L., Yu, H., & LI, P. (2026) · South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences · doi:10.4102/sajems.v29i1.7018
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Department of Communication Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 366-410
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2990520658
- Cited by
- 2,732
- References
- 284
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1145 · 2025: 477 · 2024: 350 · 2023: 288 · 2022: 247 · 2021: 175 · 2020: 48
- FWCI
- 237.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- algorithmic control, contested terrain, labour process theory, rational control, employee resistance, worker evaluation, worker discipline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
