Cited by 32Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsTakotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena

Managing psychogenic pseudosyncope: facts and experiences

Open access
Tannemaat, Martijn R., Thijs, Roland D., Van Dijk, J. Gert·2014·Cardiology Journal

Abstract

Psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS) is a common cause of apparent transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) with a dramatic impact on the quality of life. This review aims to give an overview of the definition, incidence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PPS based on a combination of literature data and personal experience. The limited literature on the subject suggests that PPS is relatively common but insufficiently recognized. PPS is probably similar to psychogenic nonepiteptic seizures (PNES), in which a long delay to diagnosis worsens the prognosis. A detailed history is of paramount importance for the diagnosis. The key feature in the history of patients with PPS is the occurrence of frequent, long attacks of apparent TLOC with closed eyes. The diagnosis is certain when a typical event is recorded during a tilt-table test with simultaneous blood pressure (BP), heart rate and video-electroencephalographic recordings. Home video and BP recording during an attack can be very useful. The diagnosis should be communicated to the patient in a way that is clear, understandable and does not cause offense. Although treatment options have not been investigated formally, the literature on PNES suggests that cognitive behavioral therapy is beneficial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5603/cj.a2014.0070

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diagnosis of PPS rests on positive clues taken from the patient's history and from documenting normal EEG results, HR, or BP during an attack.

    “The diagnosis of PPS rests on positive clues taken from the patient's history and from documenting normal EEG results, HR, or BP during an attack.”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [154]

    The History taking and Conclusions sections support using characteristic history and measurements during an attack to diagnose PPS. But Additional tests specifies that the gold standards for distinguishing PPS from syncope are blood pressure not low enough to cause unconsciousness and a normal EEG during the attack; it does not say that a normal HR, BP, or EEG result alone is sufficient. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Injury does not exclude PNES or PPS.

    “Injury does not exclude PNES or PPS.”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [154]

    In “Diagnosing PPS: History taking” (page not provided), the paper says PPS can cause physical trauma and that the presence of trauma is not diagnostically reliable. This supports the claim for PPS, but the passage does not make the same point about injury in PNES. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is usually no recognisable trigger, and no sweating, pallor, or nausea beforehand in PPS.

    “There is usually no recognisable trigger, and no sweating, pallor, or nausea beforehand.”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [154]

    In “Diagnosing PPS: History taking” (page unavailable), the paper says patients with PPS often report no prodromal features and that extreme pallor is not described. It does not specifically establish that sweating or nausea are absent beforehand, or that attacks usually have no recognisable trigger. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In most cases, the duration of PPS is as short as in syncope, but a much longer duration is a useful diagnostic finding: patients may lie immobile on the floor for 15-30 min.

    “In most cases, the duration of PPS is as short as in syncope, but a much longer duration is a useful diagnostic finding: patients may lie immobile on the floor for 15-30 min.”

    From 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (2018) · cites this paper as [154]

    The History taking section says that longer apparent loss of consciousness helps distinguish PPS from vasovagal syncope, and describes immobile attacks lasting 30 minutes or longer. It does not support the claim that PPS is as short as syncope in most cases; it describes PPS attacks as typically longer. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HBPM can be used to clarify that BP is not low during episodes of PPS.

    “Finally, HBPM can be used to clarify that BP is not low during episodes of PPS. 154”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tannemaat, M. R., Thijs, R. D., & Van Dijk, J. G.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Cardiology Journal
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
658-664
ISSN
  • 1897-5593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1898-018X
OpenAlex
W2320457362
Cited by
32
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
Keywords
transient loss of consciousness, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, tilt table test, video electroencephalography, cognitive behavioral therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, patient communication, quality of life
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Quality of Life, Unconsciousness, Disease Management, Dystonic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review