Cited by 99Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsVestibular and auditory disorders

The semiology of tilt-induced psychogenic pseudosyncope

Open access
Tannemaat, Martijn R., van Niekerk, Julius, Reijntjes, Robert H., Thijs, Roland D., Sutton, Richard, van Dijk, J. Gert·2013·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a detailed semiology to aid the clinical recognition of psychogenic pseudosyncope (PPS), which concerns episodes of apparent transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) that mimic syncope. METHODS: We analyzed all consecutive tilt-table tests from 2006 to 2012 showing proven PPS, i.e., apparent TLOC had occurred without EEG changes or a decrease in heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP). We analyzed baseline characteristics, video data, EEG, ECG, and continuous BP measurements on a 1-second time scale. Data were compared with those of 69 cases of tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (VVS). RESULTS: Of 800 tilt-table tests, 43 (5.4%) resulted in PPS. The majority (74%) were women. The median duration of apparent TLOC was longer in PPS (44 seconds) than in VVS (20 seconds, p < 0.05). During the event, the eyes were closed in 97% in PPS but in only 7% in VVS (p < 0.0001). A sudden head drop or moving down the tilt table was more common in PPS than in VVS (p < 0.01), but jerking movements occurred more frequently in VVS (p < 0.0001). In PPS, both HR and BP increased before and during apparent TLOC (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PPS is clinically distinct from VVS and can be diagnosed accurately with tilt-table testing and simultaneous EEG monitoring. Compared with VVS, eye closure during the event, long periods of apparent TLOC, and high HR and BP are highly specific for PPS. Improved understanding of the semiology of PPS as a clinical entity is vital to ensure accurate diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a1aa88

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tilt testing may be helpful in separating syncope from psychogenic pseudosyncope.

    “Tilt testing may be helpful in separating syncope from PPS.”
  • A normal EEG helps to confirm the diagnosis of psychogenic pseudosyncope.

    “a normal EEG helps to confirm the diagnosis. 116,117”
  • Video recording of tilt-induced PPS ensures that apparent TLOC occurs while BP and HR are not low; adding an EEG increases the diagnostic probability of PPS even further.

    “Video recording of tiltinduced PPS 116 ensures that apparent TLOC occurs while BP and HR are not low; adding an EEG increases the diagnostic probability of PPS even further.”
  • The eyes are usually open in epileptic seizures and syncope but are usually closed in psychogenic TLOC.

    “The eyes are usually open in epileptic seizures and syncope but are usually closed in psychogenic TLOC.”
  • PPS and PNES differ pathophysiologically from the TLOC forms that they resemble: in PPS, BP and HR are normal or high rather than low, and the EEG is normal instead of showing the slowing or flattening typical of syncope; in contrast to epileptic seizures, the EEG in PNES shows no epileptiform brain activity during an attack.

    “PPS and PNES differ pathophysiologically from the TLOC forms that they resemble: in PPS, BP and HR are normal or high rather than low, and the EEG is normal instead of showing the slowing or flattening typical of syncope; in contrast to epileptic seizures, the EEG in PNES shows no epileptiform brain activity during an attack.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tannemaat, M. R., van Niekerk, J., Reijntjes, R. H., Thijs, R. D., Sutton, R., & van Dijk, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (M.R.T., R.H.R., R.D.T., J.G.v.D.), Leiden University Medical Centre; Laboratory for Neuroregeneration (M.R.T.), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam; Faculty of Medicine (J.v.N.), Leiden University; SEIN–Epilepsy Institute in the Netherlands Foundation (R.D.T.), Heemstede, the Netherlands; UCL (R.D.T.), Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, London; Imperial College London (R.S....
Venue
Neurology
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
81
Issue
8
Pages
752-758
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2149786680
Cited by
99
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
transient loss of consciousness, vasovagal syncope, tilt table test, semiology, eyelid closure, heart rate, blood pressure, EEG monitoring, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Diagnosis, Differential, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Sensitivity and Specificity, Unconsciousness, Reproducibility of Results, Tilt-Table Test, Syncope, Vasovagal, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review