Cited by 28Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersMemory Processes and Influences

Sleep Restriction Impairs Vocabulary Learning when Adolescents Cram for Exams: The Need for Sleep Study

Open access
Huang, Sha, Deshpande, Aadya, Yeo, Sing-Chen, Lo, June C., Chee, Michael W.L., Gooley, Joshua J.·2016·Sleep

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the interaction of study spacing and time in bed (TIB) for sleep on vocabulary learning in adolescents. In the Need for Sleep Study, 56 adolescents aged 15-19 years were randomly assigned to a week of either 5 h or 9 h of TIB for sleep each night. Recall performance was examined 0 h, 24 h, and 120 h after all items were studied. Recall of massed items was impaired by a greater amount in adolescents exposed to sleep restriction. In contrast, cued recall performance on spaced items was similar between sleep groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.6092

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

10 of 32 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Sleep restriction resulted in a greater number of attentional failures on a visual reaction time test.

    “In the same group of students, we found that exposure to sleep restriction resulted in a greater number of attentional failures on a visual reaction time test.22”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Lo, 2016, Cognitive performance, sleepiness, and mood in partially sleep deprived adolescents: the Need for Sleep Study, Sleep source
  • Premisecitation

    Retention is better if learning is followed by sleep rather than wakefulness.

    “demonstrating that retention is better if followed by sleep rather than wakefulness.7,18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] Diekelmann, 2010, The memory function of sleep, Nat Rev Neurosci source
    • cites [18] Gais, 2006, Sleep after learning aids memory recall, Learn Mem source
  • Premisecitation

    In a meta-analysis of spaced learning on verbal memory tasks, for retention intervals ranging from a day to a month, the spacing effect was greatest when the interval between study sessions was about a day.

    “In a meta-analysis of spaced learning on verbal memory tasks, it was shown that for retention intervals ranging from a day to a month, the spacing effect was greatest when the interval between study sessions was about a day.12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Cepeda, 2006, Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis, Psychol Bull source
  • Study design and conductcitation

    Both sleep groups slept a similar amount at baseline.

    “As reported elsewhere, both sleep groups slept a similar amount at baseline”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Lo, 2016, Cognitive performance, sleepiness, and mood in partially sleep deprived adolescents: the Need for Sleep Study, Sleep source
    • cites [31] Ong, 2016, EEG changes across multiple nights of sleep restriction and recovery in adolescents: the Need for Sleep Study, Sleep source
  • Study design and conductcitation

    The 5-h time-in-bed condition was associated with a large daily reduction in total sleep time relative to the 9-h time-in-bed condition.

    “whereas the 5-h TIB condition was associated with a large daily reduction in total sleep time relative to the 9-h TIB condition.22,31”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Lo, 2016, Cognitive performance, sleepiness, and mood in partially sleep deprived adolescents: the Need for Sleep Study, Sleep source
    • cites [31] Ong, 2016, EEG changes across multiple nights of sleep restriction and recovery in adolescents: the Need for Sleep Study, Sleep source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The protective effect of increased study spacing is explained in part by increased contextual variability at the time of encoding when items are spaced rather than massed, leading to more cues available to aid in recall.

    “It is also possible that the protective effect of increased study spacing is explained in part by increased contextual variability at the time of encoding when items are spaced rather than massed, leading to more cues available to aid in recall.43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Lohnas, 2011, Contextual variability in free recall, J Mem Lang source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The spacing effect has been demonstrated for a wide variety of learning tasks ranging from fine motor skills to vocabulary learning, assessed in the laboratory or classroom.

    “have been demonstrated for a wide variety of learning tasks ranging from fine motor skills to vocabulary learning, assessed either in the laboratory or in the classroom.[12][13][14][15]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Cepeda, 2006, Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis, Psychol Bull source

      Past Quantitative Reviews (p. 3) reports spacing benefits for verbal learning and motor skills, and the paper discusses foreign-language tasks. Inclusion Criteria (p. 5) confirms that its own synthesis covers varied verbal-recall tasks, not motor skills. The copy does not establish that the effects were demonstrated in both laboratory and classroom settings, so that setting-specific part remains unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] Donovan, 1999, A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don't, J Appl Psychol source
    • cites [14] Lee, 1988, Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered, Res Q Exerc Sport source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The spacing effect has obvious implications for students and instructors alike, as learning and retention can potentially be optimized by appropriately spacing study sessions and course material over time.

    “The spacing effect has obvious implications for students and instructors alike, as learning and retention can potentially be optimized by appropriately spacing study sessions and course material over time.15,48”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] Seabrook, 2005, Distributed and massed practice from laboratory to classroom, Appl Cognit Psychol source
    • cites [48] Moulton, 2006, Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial, Ann Surg source

      The Abstract reports that surgical residents retained skills better after distributed practice and recommends restructuring surgical-training schedules. The claim extends that finding to students’ study sessions and course material generally, which this paper did not test. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In an exploratory analysis, there was a significant interaction between massed-item Set and time in bed, such that the difference in recall performance between sleep groups was marginally greater for massed items presented in Set 3 relative to Sets 1, 2, and 4.

    “there was a significant interaction between Set and TIB (LR χ 2 = 8.48, P = 0.037, η 2 = 0.017), such that the difference in recall performance between sleep groups was marginally greater for massed items presented in Set 3 (Tukey test, P = 0.024) relative to Sets 1, 2, and 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    There was an approximately linear increase in test scores for massed items during the study phase.

    “There was an approximately linear increase in test scores for massed items because participants were shown 5 new massed word pairs each day but were tested on all items from the beginning of the experiment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There was a main effect of order on test scores, with better recall of items presented in the second study block of each study session.

    “Although there was a main effect of order on test scores with better recall of items presented in the second study block of each study session”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both sleep groups showed a nonlinear increase in recall performance for spaced items across the 4 study sessions, with the largest improvement between the first and second study sessions.

    “Both sleep groups showed a nonlinear increase in recall performance for spaced items across the 4 study sessions (Figure 2A), with the largest improvement observed between the first and second study sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All 3-way interactions and the 4-way interaction did not reach statistical significance.

    “Likewise, all 3-way interactions and the 4-way interaction did not reach statistical significance (LR χ 2 ≤ 0.20, P > 0.8 for all 3-way/4-way interactions).”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “All 3-way interactions and the 4-way interaction did not reach statistical significance (Retention phase: LR χ 2 ≤ 0.20, P > 0.8; Review phase: LR χ 2 < 1.3, P > 0.2 for all 3-way/4-way interactions).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Session did not interact with time in bed, and no other interactions reached statistical significance in that analysis.

    “Session did not interact with TIB (χ 2 = 1.70,P = 0.19), however, and no other interactions reached statistical significance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There was no significant interaction involving order and other predictors.

    “was no significant interaction involving order and other predictors (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    By the end of the second study session, test performance was qualitatively similar on spaced items versus massed items, even though subjects had to remember twice as many spaced items with half the number of flashcard presentations.

    “By the end of the second study session, test performance was qualitatively similar on spaced items versus massed items, even though subjects had to remember twice as many spaced items with only half the number of flashcard presentations (20 spaced items shown 4 times each versus 10 massed items shown 8 times each).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sleep restriction had no measurable effect on cued recall performance for items spaced across 4 consecutive days, despite a 28-h reduction in sleep opportunity in the 5-h TIB condition from the first day of studying to the final day of testing.

    “we found that sleep restriction had no measurable effect on cued recall performance for items that were spaced across 4 consecutive days, despite a 28-h reduction in the opportunity for sleep in the 5-h TIB condition from the first day of studying to the final day of testing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The difference in cued recall performance between the 5-h TIB and 9-h TIB groups persisted until the one-time review session that occurred 120 h after learning, which then boosted recall for massed items.

    “The difference in cued recall performance between the 5-h TIB and 9-h TIB groups persisted until the one-time review session that occurred 120 h after learning, which then boosted recall for massed items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The small increase in test scores for non-studied items was similar between sleep groups, and hence did not explain the interaction between study spacing and TIB for sleep.

    “Importantly, the small increase in test scores for non-studied items was similar between sleep groups, and hence did not explain the interaction between study spacing and TIB for sleep.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a significant interaction between Set and TIB, in which students exposed to sleep restriction showed significantly lower test scores for massed items presented in Sets 2 and 3 after all items had been studied.

    “There was a significant interaction between Set and TIB (LR χ 2 = 10.71,P = 0.013), in which students who were exposed to sleep restriction showed significantly lower test scores for massed items presented in Sets 2 and 3 after all items had been studied (indicated by red asterisks, P < 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    In the week before the study, subjects were required to maintain a fixed sleep-wake schedule with 9 h of time in bed per night, verified by actigraphy monitoring.

    “In the week before the study, subjects were required to maintain a fixed sleep-wake schedule with 9 h of TIB per night from 23:00 to 08:00, which was verified by actigraphy monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Social jet lag and sleep debt can result in fatigue and suboptimal performance.

    “Similar to the effects of rapid travel across time zones, social jet jag and sleep debt can result in fatigue and suboptimal performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since only one combination of these factors was examined, the spacing effect might differ if any one of these parameters is manipulated.

    “Since only one combination of these factors was examined, the spacing effect might differ if any one of these parameters is manipulated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most students choose to spontaneously cut large flashcard decks into smaller stacks, even though such behavior likely represents a suboptimal strategy for long-term learning.

    “Interestingly, most students choose to spontaneously cut large flashcard decks into smaller stacks, 50 even though such behavior likely represents a suboptimal strategy for long-term learning.32”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [50] Salisbury, 1988, A comparison of a microcomputer progressive state drill and flashcards for learning paired associates, J Computer Based Instruction
    • cites [32] Kornell, 2009, Optimising learning using flashcards: spacing is more effective than cramming, Appl Cognit Psychol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not perform an a priori power analysis to assess whether the sample size would be adequate for the statistical comparisons that were performed.

    “Another limitation of our study is that we did not perform an a priori power analysis to assess whether our sample size would be adequate for the statistical comparisons that were performed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomly assigned to 9-h and 5-h time-in-bed groups prior to the start of the 14-day protocol.

    “participants were randomly assigned to 9-h TIB and 5-h TIB groups (n = 30 per group) prior to the start of the 14-day protocol”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The order of presentation did not interact with study spacing, indicating that findings for TIB and study spacing were not confounded by order effects.

    “The order of presentation did not interact with study spacing (Table 2), indicating that our findings for TIB and study spacing were not confounded by order effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Long-term retention is improved when studying takes place at spaced intervals rather than all at once.

    “Ebbinghaus showed that long-term retention is improved when studying takes place at spaced intervals, as opposed to all at once.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Ebbinghaus, 1885, Memory; a contribution to experimental psychology

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent work suggests that memories are actively strengthened and stabilized during sleep.

    “However, recent work suggests that memories are actively strengthened and stabilized during sleep.20”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Ellenbogen, 2006, The role of sleep in declarative memory consolidation: passive, permissive, active or none?, Curr Opin Neurobiol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The present study was not designed to tease apart the differential effects of sleep restriction on encoding versus memory consolidation.

    “The present study was not designed to tease apart the differential effects of sleep restriction on encoding versus memory consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because both sleep groups were given 9 h of TIB on the night before the first study session, the strength of encoding would be expected to be similar for the first set of massed items.

    “Because both sleep groups were given 9 h of TIB on the night before the first study session, the strength of encoding would be expected to be similar for the first set of massed items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    We do not know whether advanced exposure to unpaired cue words affected subsequent learning and recall of these massed items.

    “Although this allowed us to examine whether students were able to guess target words before they were studied, we do not know whether advanced exposure to unpaired cue words affected subsequent learning and recall of these massed items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Polysomnographic data were analyzed on selected nights of the study to validate the sleep manipulation.

    “Polysomnographic data were analyzed on selected nights of the study (nights 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, and 13) to validate the sleep manipulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The limited benefit of increased study spacing in the group given 9 h of TIB could be explained in part by a ceiling effect, since these students performed well at recalling massed items and had less room for improvement relative to the sleep restriction group.

    “The limited benefit of increased study spacing in the group of participants given 9 h of TIB could also be explained in part by a ceiling effect, since these students performed well at recalling items that were massed and had less room for improvement relative to the group that underwent sleep restriction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Cramming for exams and trading sleep for other activities may come at the expense of increased forgetting, whereas increasing study spacing can serve to minimize the negative effects of sleep loss on learning.

    “These results indicate that cramming for exams and trading sleep for other activities may come at the expense of increased forgetting, whereas increasing study spacing can serve to minimize the negative effects of sleep loss on learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This mechanism could serve to protect against the otherwise impairing effects of sleep loss on learning and memory consolidation.

    “This mechanism could serve to protect against the otherwise impairing effects of sleep loss on learning and memory consolidation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of forgetting in our study could be attributed to students learning the word pairs too well for a decrease in cued recall performance to be observed in the time window examined.

    “However, it is possible that the lack of forgetting in our study could be attributed to students learning the word pairs too well for a decrease in cued recall performance to be observed in the time window examined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This potentially leads to poorer academic outcomes, with negative implications for long-term learning.

    “This potentially leads to poorer academic outcomes, 52 with negative implications for long-term learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Touitou, 2013, Adolescent sleep misalignment: a chronic jet lag and a matter of public health, J Physiol Paris source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When asked to predict their recall performance of studied items that were massed or spaced, students often misjudge cramming as the better study strategy, even when their test results show the opposite effect.

    “Moreover, when asked to predict their recall performance of studied items that were massed or spaced, students often misjudge cramming as the better study strategy, even when their test results show the opposite effect.32”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Kornell, 2009, Optimising learning using flashcards: spacing is more effective than cramming, Appl Cognit Psychol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationcitation

    Sleep might have contributed differentially to the initial consolidation and later refinement of memory as participants were exposed to spaced items over the course of 4 consecutive days.

    “contributed differentially to the initial consolidation and later refinement of memory as participants were exposed to spaced items over the course of 4 consecutive days.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Fogel, 2015, How to become an expert: a new perspective on the role of sleep in the mastery of procedural skills, Neurobiol Learn Mem source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Two nights of sleep restriction represented a critical threshold affecting sleep-dependent memory consolidation, whereas students were able to tolerate the first night of partial sleep loss without detectable memory impairment.

    “Alternatively, it is possible that 2 nights of sleep restriction represented a critical threshold affecting sleep-dependent memory consolidation, whereas students were able to tolerate the first night of partial sleep loss without detectable memory impairment.45”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Kopasz, 2010, No persisting effect of partial sleep curtailment on cognitive performance and declarative memory recall in adolescents, J Sleep Res source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These factors often lead to a disparity between sleep behavior on weekdays versus weekends, and hence social and biological time, which has been dubbed social jet lag.

    “These factors often lead to a disparity between sleep behavior on weekdays versus weekends, and hence social and biological time, which has been dubbed”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Wittmann, 2006, Social jetlag. misalignment of biological and social time, Chronobiol Int source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Sleep restriction might have impaired overnight consolidation of massed items, as there was a trend for decreased recall performance on the day after encoding relative to students given 9 h of TIB.

    “In addition, exposure to 5 h of TIB might have impaired overnight consolidation of massed items, as there was a trend for decreased recall performance on the day after encoding relative to students given 9 h of TIB (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were not informed of their sleep-group assignment until the first day of the study.

    “however, they were not informed of their assignment until the first day of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Sleep loss on subsequent nights might have resulted in weaker encoding of short-term memory, even if participants were able to perform well on the immediate recall test, thus increasing the likelihood of forgetting of these items.

    “By comparison, sleep loss on subsequent nights might have resulted in weaker encoding of short-term memory, 44 even if participants were able to perform well on the immediate recall test, thus increasing the likelihood of forgetting of these items.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Yoo, 2007, A deficit in the ability to form new human memories without sleep, Nat Neurosci source
40 of 40
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many students cram for exams and trade sleep for other activities.

    “However, many students cram for exams and trade sleep for other activities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It has yet to be examined whether repeated exposure to sleep restriction modulates the effects of study spacing on memory.

    “However, it has yet to be examined whether repeated exposure to sleep restriction, which often occurs during the school week in adolescents, modulates the effects of study spacing on memory.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most research on the role of sleep in declarative memory has focused on recall performance after a single study opportunity, while in real life students usually learn across days.

    “Most research on the role of sleep in declarative memory has focused on recall performance after a single study opportunity, while in real life students usually learn across days.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A more effective strategy for long-term learning would be to space studying over multiple days with intervening episodes of sufficient sleep.

    “Presumably, a more effective strategy for long-term learning would be to space studying over multiple days with intervening episodes of sufficient sleep.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study design simulates what often occurs in adolescents during a typical school week, in which sleep deprivation accumulates over multiple days.

    “Although this study design simulates what often occurs in adolescents during a typical school week, in which sleep deprivation accumulates over multiple days, we cannot determine with certainty which specific memory processes were affected by exposure to sleep restriction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The spacing effect in this flashcard task is representative of learning and retention in educational settings.

    “The spacing effect has obvious implications for students and instructors alike, as learning and retention can potentially be optimized by appropriately spacing study sessions and course material over time.15,48”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Flashcard learning is a common approach used by students to prepare for standardized tests including the GRE.

    “We examined flashcard learning because this is a common approach used by students to prepare for standardized tests including the GRE, and yet there is little guidance for students on how to use flashcards for learning.49”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Large stacks of cards increase spacing between repeated items, whereas smaller decks reduce spacing.

    “Large stacks of cards increase spacing between repeated items, whereas smaller decks reduce spacing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social jet lag and sleep debt can result in fatigue and suboptimal performance.

    “Similar to the effects of rapid travel across time zones, social jet jag and sleep debt can result in fatigue and suboptimal performance.”
9 of 9

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2014, Sleep in America Poll
  2. Heine, 1914, Uber Wiedererkennen und ruckwirdende Hemmung, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 68, 161
  3. Bjork, 2016, A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. From learning processes to cognitive processes. Essays in honor of William K, Estes, 2, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, S., Deshpande, A., Yeo, S.-C., Lo, J. C., Chee, M. W. L., & Gooley, J. J.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Gooley, Joshua J.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1681-1690
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2414004056
Cited by
28
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep restriction, vocabulary acquisition, spaced learning, massed learning, adolescents, memory retention, cued recall, study habits, insufficient sleep
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mental Recall, Sleep Deprivation, Vocabulary, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review