Cited by 201Child Nutrition and Water AccessInfant Nutrition and HealthPublic Health and Nutrition

Environmental enteric dysfunction and child stunting

Open access
Budge, Sophie, Parker, Alison H, Hutchings, Paul T, Garbutt, Camila·2019·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

In 2017, an estimated 1 in every 4 (23%) children aged < 5 years were stunted worldwide. With slow progress in stunting reduction in many regions and the realization that a large proportion of stunting is not due to insufficient diet or diarrhea alone, it remains that other factors must explain continued growth faltering. Environmental enteric dysfunction (EED), a subclinical state of intestinal inflammation, can occur in infants across the developing world and is proposed as an immediate causal factor connecting poor sanitation and stunting. A result of chronic pathogen exposure, EED presents multiple causal pathways, and as such the scope and sensitivity of traditional water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions have possibly been unsubstantial. Although the definite pathogenesis of EED and the mechanism by which stunting occurs are yet to be defined, this paper reviews the existing literature surrounding the proposed pathology and transmission of EED in infants and considerations for nutrition and WASH interventions to improve linear growth worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nutrit/nuy068

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EED and repeated diarrhoea cause nutrient malabsorption and, together with the intake of poor-quality food, result in growth retardation in the form of wasting and stunting.

    “EED and repeated diarrhoea cause nutrient malabsorption and, together with the intake of poor-quality food, result in growth retardation in the form of wasting and stunting [76].”

    From Intestinal Parasitic Infection and Nutritional Status in Children under Five Years Old: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [76]

    In “The missing piece of the stunting puzzle” (page unavailable), the paper describes malabsorption in EED and identifies food quality and quantity as relevant to preventing stunting. “Enteric infection and nutritional status” suggests that EED-related gut disturbances combined with limited diet contribute to stunting. The claim goes further than the paper by presenting repeated diarrhoea as a definite cause and adding wasting: the paper says diarrhoea’s causal role in stunting is uncertain, and the retrieved passages do not support a wasting outcome. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Linear growth occurs from the ages of 6 to 24 months; in this phase, demand for nutrients is high and if faced with a poor nutrient environment, children will be stunted.

    “Linear growth occurs from the ages of 6 to 24 months. In this phase, demand for nutrients is high and if faced with a poor nutrient environment, children will be stunted [76].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [52]USAID. Toward a Hygienic Environment for Infants and Young Children: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: USAID Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Partnerships and Sustainability (WASHPaLS) Project, 2018.
  2. [122]Ashraf S, Hussain F, Leontsini E, et al Continued environmental fecal contamination following implementation of sanitation hardware. Health Sci Bull. 2013; 11: 9– 14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budge, S., Parker, A. H., Hutchings, P. T., & Garbutt, C.
Affiliations
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • People in Need (CZ)
Corresponding author
Parker, Alison H
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2019-02-07
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
240-253
ISSN
  • 0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-4887
OpenAlex
W2912378060
Cited by
201
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Cranfield University and People in Need
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
environmental enteric dysfunction, child stunting, intestinal inflammation, poor sanitation, water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, pathogen exposure, linear growth, infant nutrition, failure to thrive
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Diarrhea, Environment, Feeding Behavior, Growth Disorders, Humans, Hygiene, Infant, Nutritional Status, Sanitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review