Cited by 6Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFamily and Disability Support ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Adaptation of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form to Spanish Family Caregivers of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Open access
Oñate, Lucía, Calvete, Esther·2018·Anales de Psicología

Abstract

In recent years, mindfulness-focused interventions have garnered attention in the area of family members of people with an intellectual and developmental disability (IDD). The mindfulness trait has been related to a greater well-being, lower levels of anxiety and depression and a better quality of life in this group. Therefore, developing tools that assess mindfulness is relevant. The aim of this study was to adapt the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form (FFMQ-SF; Bohlmeijer, ten Klooster, Fledderus, Veehof, & Baer, 2011) to Spanish caregivers of people with IDD. Two hundred sixty-five relatives of people with IDD (84.5% women and 15.5 % men) aged between 18 and 80 years participated in the research, completing this questionnaire along with measures of psychological distress and quality of life. The results confirmed the factor structure of the FFMQ-SF, consisting of five correlated factors (Observe, Describe, Act with awareness, Nonreact to inner experience, and Nonjudge inner experience). The factors showed adequate internal consistency. In addition, significant relationships were observed between the most of the mindfulness facets and less psychological distress as well as with better quality of life. The results suggest that the FFMQ-SF can be used adequately with relatives of people with IDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6018/analesps.34.2.294551

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the FFMQ and FFMQ-SF have been validated primarily in samples of healthy adults, meditators, and depressive patients.

    “Both the FFMQ and FFMQ-SF have been validated primarily in samples of healthy adults, meditators, and depressive patients [20–26].”

    From Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire—short form in cancer patients: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (page not available in our copy) reports FFMQ work in meditating and non-meditating groups and FFMQ-SF validation in patients with depressive symptoms. It also describes use in general-population and other clinical groups, but does not establish that healthy adults, meditators, and depressive patients were the primary validation samples for both questionnaires. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. anales de psicología, 2018, vol. 34, nº 2 (may)
  2. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4 th . Edition). London, England: SAGE.
  3. Quezada-Berumen, L.; González-Ramírez, M.T.; Cebolla, A.; Soler, J., & Garcia-Campayo, J. (2014). Conciencia corporal y mindfulness: Valida- ción de la versión española de la escala de conexión corporal (SBC). Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 42(2), 57-67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oñate, L., & Calvete, E.
Affiliations
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Venue
Anales de Psicología
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
305
ISSN
  • 0212-9728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1695-2294
OpenAlex
W2796914209
Cited by
6
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anales de Psicología (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DeustoTeka (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Riberdis (Spanish Centre for Disability Documentation (CEDD)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mindfulness, family caregivers, intellectual and developmental disabilities, Spanish adaptation, psychometric validation, factor structure, psychological distress, quality of life, mindfulness facets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review