The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendation for pair-wise key-establishment schemes using discrete logarithm cryptography
Open accessAbstract
This publication has been developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014, 44 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq., Public Law (P.L.) 113-283.NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal information systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems.This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130.Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority.Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“NIST changed this recommendation in the 3rd revision of SP800-56A [4], and are now advocating using a fixed set of safe-prime groups with moduli of length up to 8192 bits, with short or full length exponents.”
From How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Note that an n bit prime order elliptic curve group provides approximately n/ 2 bits of classical security (see Appendix D to [4]), since the best classical attacks are cycle-finding attacks, whilst RSA-1024, RSA-2048 and RSA-3072 provide approximately 80 , 112 and 128 bits of classical security, respectively, according to the model used by NIST (see Appendix D to [5]).”
From How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SHA-3 standard: permutation-based hash and extendable-output functions
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US) (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.202 · Cited by 783
(2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.180-4 · Cited by 542
Transitions: Recommendation for Transitioning the Use of Cryptographic Algorithms and Key Lengths
Barker, E. B., & Roginsky, A. L. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-131ar1 · Cited by 198
Self-citationElliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Blake-Wilson⋆⋆, S., Bolyard, N., Gupta, V., Hawk, C., & Moeller, B. (2006) · doi:10.17487/rfc4492 · Cited by 169
Security requirements for cryptographic modules
Security, C. C., Evans, D. L., Brown, K. H., Director, A., & Director, W. M. (2001) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.140-2 · Cited by 160
SHA-3 derived functions: cSHAKE, KMAC, TupleHash and ParallelHash
Kelsey, J. M., Change, S.-J., & Perlner, R. A. (2016) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-185 · Cited by 154
Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation :
Dworkin, M. J. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-38b · Cited by 114
Recommendation for key derivation using pseudorandom functions (revised)
Chen, L. (2009) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-108 · Cited by 76
Self-citationMcKay, K. A., & Cooper, D. A. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-52r2 · Cited by 66
Recommendation for Cryptographic Key Generation
Barker, E. B., & Roginsky, A. L. (2012) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-133 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- S. Blake-Wilson, A. Menezes, Unknown Key-Share Attacks on the Station- to-Station (STS) Protocol, Technical Report CORR 98-42, University of Waterloo, 1998. Available at: http://cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca.
- A. Menezes, Another look at HMQV. Journal of Mathematical Cryptology, Vol.1(1), pp. 47-64, 2007
- Section 5.7.2.3: Clarified error handling in step 3. This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-56Ar3 47. Section 6.2.1.1-6.2.1.4: Clarified error handling. 48. Section 6.2.2: Modified the first assumption to refer to Section 5.5.1 for the domain parameter information. Now refer to Section 5.9.3 for the minimum MacKey and Mac tag lengths. 49. Section 6.2.2.1-6.2.2.2: Clarified error handling. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits
Gidney, C., & Ekerå, M. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433 · Cited by 830
Status report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D. A., Dang, Q. H., Dang, T., Kelsey, J. M., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C. A., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413 · Cited by 492
Status report on the first round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Alagic, G., Alperin-Sheriff, J., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., Peralta, R., Perlner, R., et al. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8240 · Cited by 364
Status report on the third round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization process
Alagic, G., Apon, D., Cooper, D., Dang, Q., Dang, T., Kelsey, J., Lichtinger, J., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C., Moody, D., et al. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8413-upd1 · Cited by 301
Status report on the second round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process
Moody, D., Alagic, G., Apon, D. C., Cooper, D. A., Dang, Q. H., Kelsey, J. M., Liu, Y.-K., Miller, C. A., Peralta, R. C., Perlner, R. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8309 · Cited by 296
Recommendation for key management: part 1 - general
Barker, E. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-57pt1r5 · Cited by 271
Self-citationModule-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US) (2024) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.203 · Cited by 268
Transitioning the use of cryptographic algorithms and key lengths
Barker, E. B., & Roginsky, A. L. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-131ar2 · Cited by 194
Self-citationRecommendations for Discrete Logarithm-based Cryptography:
Chen, L., Moody, D., Regenscheid, A., Robinson, A., & Randall, K. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-186 · Cited by 104
Self-citationDigital Signature Standard (DSS)Preprint
Regenscheid, A. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.fips.186-5-draft · Cited by 111
IoT device cybersecurity capability core baseline
Fagan, M. E., Megas, K. N., Scarfone, K. A., & Smith, M. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259a · Cited by 92
Recommendation for key management:
Barker, E. B., & Barker, W. C. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-57pt2r1 · Cited by 92
Self-citationCompact Dilithium Implementations on Cortex-M3 and Cortex-M4
Greconici, D. O. C., Kannwischer, M. J., & Sprenkels, D. (2020) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2021.i1.1-24 · Cited by 91
Recommendation for key derivation using pseudorandom functions
Chen, L. (2022) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-108r1 · Cited by 82
Self-citationRecommendation for pair-wise key establishment using integer factorization cryptography
Barker, E., Chen, L., Roginsky, A., Vassilev, A., Davis, R., & Simon, S. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56br2 · Cited by 81
Self-citationDuch, M. L., Grossmann, M. R. P., & Lauer, T. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100400 · Cited by 70
Protecting controlled unclassified information in nonfederal systems and organizations
Ross, R., Pillitteri, V. Y., Dempsey, K. L., Riddle, M., & Guissanie, G. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-171r2 · Cited by 73
Popoola, O. J., Rodrigues, M., Marchang, J., Shenfield, A., Ikpehai, A., & Popoola, J. (2024) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2024.101314 · Cited by 86
Recommendation for Key Derivation Using Pseudorandom Functions, Revision 1 (Draft)Preprint
Chen, L. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-108r1-draft · Cited by 60
Self-citationMcKay, K. A., & Cooper, D. A. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-52r2 · Cited by 66
NIST First Call for Multi-Party Threshold Schemes
Peralta, R., & Brandão, L. T. A. N. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8214c.ipd · Cited by 46
RetractedRecommendations for Discrete-Logarithm Based Cryptography:Preprint
Regenscheid, A. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-186-draft · Cited by 37
Halak, B., Gibson, T., Henley, M., Botea, C.-B., Heath, B., & Khan, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3350775 · Cited by 41
Recommendation for key-derivation methods in key-establishment schemes
Barker, E. B., Chen, L., & Davis, R. (2018) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56cr1 · Cited by 37
Self-citationRecommendation for cryptographic key generation
Barker, E. B., & Roginsky, A. L. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-133r1 · Cited by 36
Self-citationBaseri, Y., Chouhan, V., Ghorbani, A. A., & Chow, A. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104272 · Cited by 48
Mobile Energy Requirements of the Upcoming NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
Saarinen, M.-J. O. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering (MobileCloud) · doi:10.1109/mobilecloud48802.2020.00012 · Cited by 34
SEDAN: Security-Aware Design of Time-Critical Automotive Networks
Kukkala, V. K., Pasricha, S., & Bradley, T. H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.2999533 · Cited by 31
Scalable Ciphertext Compression Techniques for Post-quantum KEMs and Their Applications
Katsumata, S., Kwiatkowski, K., Pintore, F., & Prest, T. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64837-4_10 · Cited by 27
Recommendation for Key-Derivation Methods in Key-Establishment Schemes
Barker, E. B., Chen, L., & Davis, R. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56cr2 · Cited by 54
Self-citationNIST roadmap toward criteria for threshold schemes for cryptographic primitives
Brandão, L. T. A. N., Davidson, M. S., & Vassilev, A. T. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8214a · Cited by 24
Self-citationOn post-processing in the quantum algorithm for computing short discrete logarithms
Ekerå, M. (2020) · Designs, Codes and Cryptography · doi:10.1007/s10623-020-00783-2 · Cited by 23
Quantum algorithms for attacking hardness assumptions in classical and post‐quantum cryptography
Biasse, J., Bonnetain, X., Kirshanova, E., Schrottenloher, A., & Song, F. (2022) · IET Information Security · doi:10.1049/ise2.12081 · Cited by 23
Nearby Threats: Reversing, Analyzing, and Attacking Google's 'Nearby Connections' on Android
Antonioli, D., Tippenhauer, N. O., & Rasmussen, K. (2019) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2019.23367 · Cited by 21
IoT device cybersecurity guidance for the federal government :
Fagan, M. E., Marron, J. A., Brady, K., Cuthill, B., Megas, K. N., & Herold, R. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-213 · Cited by 21
Recommendation for cryptographic key generation
Barker, E. B., Roginsky, A. L., & Davis, R. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-133r2 · Cited by 38
Self-citationActivation of LoRaWAN End Devices by Using Public Key Cryptography
Marlind, F., & Bütün, İ. (2020) · Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet) · doi:10.1109/csnet50428.2020.9265530 · Cited by 20
Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and OrganizationsPreprint
Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r5-draft · Cited by 22
Barker, E. B., Dang, Q. H., Frankel, S. E., Scarfone, K. A., & Wouters, P. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-77r1 · Cited by 33
Self-citationIoT Non-technical supporting capability core baseline
Fagan, M. E., Marron, J. A., Brady, K. G., Jr., Cuthill, B., Megas, K. N., & Herold, R. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259b · Cited by 18
Truong, Q. D., Nguyen, H., Nguyen, T. T., & Lee, H. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3654142 · Cited by 23
Hybrid Scalar/Vector Implementations of Keccak and SPHINCS$$^+$$ on AArch64
Becker, H., & Kannwischer, M. J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_12 · Cited by 17
Lahraoui, Y., Lazaar, S., Amal, Y., & Nitaj, A. (2024) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography8020023 · Cited by 18
Post-Quantum Cryptography in Networking Protocols: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions
Chang, S., & Khan, Q. M. (2026) · Cryptography · doi:10.3390/cryptography10010012 · Cited by 20
Sylla, T., Chalouf, M. A., Krief, F., & Samaké, K. (2021) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2021/6632747 · Cited by 16
Smart Metering Cybersecurity—Requirements, Methodology, and Testing
Kohout, D., Lieskovan, T., & Mlýnek, P. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23084043 · Cited by 16
Attack Analysis and Enhanced Authentication Protocol Design for Vehicle Networks
Wang, W., Xie, Q., Huang, Y., Ding, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, D., Su, C., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3593599 · Cited by 15
Ren, Q., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, Y., Lei, H., Wang, L., & Chen, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3318935 · Cited by 15
Fagan, M. E., Megas, K. N., Scarfone, K. A., & Smith, M. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259-draft · Cited by 15
de la Torre, M. Á. G., Sandoval, I. A. M., de Abreu, G. T. F., & Encinas, L. H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3560023 · Cited by 16
Enabling Quantum-Resistant EDHOC: Design and Performance Evaluation
Fraile, L. P., Τασόπουλος, Γ., Koulamas, C., Zhao, R. K., Sultan, N. H., Regazzoni, F., & Fournaris, A. P. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3554010 · Cited by 12
MITM Attack on Modification of Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Algorithm
Yadav, V. K., Yadav, R. K., Chaurasia, B. K., Verma, S., & Venkatesan, S. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-8896-6_12 · Cited by 11
Bio-inspired cryptography based on proteinoid assemblies
Mougkogiannis, P., Ghadafi, E., & Adamatzky, A. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324761 · Cited by 11
IoT Device Cybersecurity Guidance for the Federal Government:Preprint
Fagan, M. E. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-213-draft · Cited by 10
Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
Ross, R., & Pillitteri, V. Y. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-171r3.ipd · Cited by 13
RetractedSecurity of Neural Network-Based Key Agreement Protocol for Smart Grids
Stypiński, M., & Niemiec, M. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16103997 · Cited by 9
Design and Performance Evaluation of an Embedded EDHOC Module
Fraile, L. P., Fournaris, A. P., & Koulamas, C. (2021) · Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO) · doi:10.1109/meco52532.2021.9459724 · Cited by 9
Foundational Cybersecurity Activities for IoT Device Manufacturers CPreprint
(2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259c-draft · Cited by 9
Recommendation for Cryptographic Key GenerationPreprint
Barker, E. B., Roginsky, A. L., & Davis, R. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-133r2-draft · Cited by 9
Self-citationIn-line rate encrypted links using pre-shared post-quantum keys and DPUs
Aguilera, A. C., García, C. R., Lawo, D. C., Imaña, J. L., Monroy, I. T., & Olmos, J. J. V. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71861-x · Cited by 13
Wu, L., Miao, F., Meng, K., & Wang, X. (2021) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-021-0483-9 · Cited by 8
Analysis of Network-level Key Exchange Protocols in the Post-Quantum Era
Pazienza, A., Lella, E., Noviello, P., & Vitulano, F. (2022) · IEEE Workshop on Low Temperature Electronics (WOLTE) · doi:10.1109/wolte55422.2022.9882818 · Cited by 8
Recommendation for Key ManagementPreprint
Barker, E. B. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-57pt1r5-draft · Cited by 8
Self-citationCryptographic Algorithms and Key Sizes for Personal Identity Verification
Ferraiolo, H., & Regenscheid, A. (2023) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-78-5.ipd · Cited by 8
RetractedEfficient Reconfigurable Integrated Cryptosystems for Cybersecurity Protection
Abebe, A. T., Negash, Y., & Kumar, P. (2020) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19353-9_4 · Cited by 7
Efficient Implementation of a Crypto Library Using Web Assembly
Park, B., Song, J., & Seo, S. C. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9111839 · Cited by 7
ETPAC: ECC based trauma plight access control for healthcare Internet of Things
Padmashree, M. G., Khanum, S., Arunalatha, J. S., & Venugopal, K. R. (2021) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-021-00691-1 · Cited by 7
Recommendation for Key-Derivation Methods in Key-Establishment SchemesPreprint
Barker, E. B., Chen, L., & Davis, R. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-56cr2-draft · Cited by 7
Self-citationInput-Latency Free Versatile Bit-Serial GF(2 m ) Polynomial Basis Multiplication
El-Razouk, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3155611 · Cited by 6
Toward Next Generation Quantum-Safe eIDs and eMRTDs: A Survey
Alnahawi, N., Schmitt, N., Wiesmaier, A., & Zok, C.-M. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3585517 · Cited by 8
Testing Smart Meters with Custom Application
Kohout, D., & Mlýnek, P. (2022) · IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST) · doi:10.1109/iccst52959.2022.9896543 · Cited by 6
Robust security framework with bit‐flipping attack and timing attack for key derivation functions
Koh, W. W., & Chuah, C. W. (2020) · IET Information Security · doi:10.1049/iet-ifs.2019.0163 · Cited by 6
KEF: A Key Exchange Framework for Operational Technology Security Standards and Guidelines
Sani, A. S., Yuan, D., Meng, K., & Dong, Z. Y. (2022) · IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) · doi:10.1109/isgt50606.2022.9817550 · Cited by 5
Semi-automatic ladderisation: improving code security through rewriting and dependent types
Brown, C., Barwell, A. D., Marquer, Y., Zendra, O., Richmond, T., & Gu, C. (2022) · ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation (PEPM) · doi:10.1145/3498886.3502202 · Cited by 5
Assessing Insider Attacks and Privacy Leakage in Managed IoT Systems for Residential Prosumers
Marco, G. D., Loia, V., Karimipour, H., & Siano, P. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14092385 · Cited by 5
Some remarks on how to hash faster onto elliptic curves
Koshelev, D. (2024) · Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques · doi:10.1007/s11416-024-00514-4 · Cited by 5
SRX–Secure Data Backup and Recovery for SGX Applications
Andrade, D., Silva, J. N., & Correia, M. P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3162489 · Cited by 5
Access Structure Hiding Secret Sharing from Novel Set Systems and Vector Families
Sehrawat, V. S., & Desmedt, Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58150-3_20 · Cited by 5
Towards NIST Standards for Threshold Schemes for Cryptographic PrimitivesPreprint
Brandão, L. T. A. N., Davidson, M. S., & Vassilev, A. T. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8214a-draft · Cited by 5
Self-citationWeight equalization algorithm for tree parity machines
Stypiński, M., & Niemiec, M. (2024) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110988 · Cited by 5
Cano, A., García, C. R., Frantz, R., Monroy, I. T., Imaña, J. L., & Olmos, J. J. V. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) · doi:10.1109/icnp61940.2024.10858568 · Cited by 4
A high-level comparison of state-of-the-art quantum algorithms for breaking asymmetric cryptography
Ekerå, M., & Gärtner, J. (2025) · IACR Communications in Cryptology · doi:10.62056/ayzojb0kr · Cited by 4
Short Paper: The Proof is in the Pudding
Hastings, M., Heninger, N., & Wustrow, E. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32101-7_24 · Cited by 4
Integrate Dragonfly Key Exchange (IETF - RFC 7664) into Arithmetic Circuit Homomorphic Encryption
Tan, L., Wee, J. W. S., Chan, J. R., Soh, W. J., & Yap, C. N. (2019) · IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC) · doi:10.1109/prdc47002.2019.00030 · Cited by 4
Recommendations for IoT Device 2 Manufacturers:Preprint
Fagan, M. E., Megas, K. N., Scarfone, K. A., & Smith, M. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259-draft2 · Cited by 4
Foundational Cybersecurity Activities for IoT Device Manufacturers DPreprint
(2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259d-draft · Cited by 4
Profile of the IoT Core Baseline for the Federal GovernmentPreprint
Fagan, M. E. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8259b-draft · Cited by 4
Baseri, Y., Chouhan, V., Ghorbani, A. A., & Chow, A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4750609 · Cited by 4
Quantum algorithms for computing general discrete logarithms and orders with tradeoffs
Ekerå, M. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Cryptology · doi:10.1515/jmc-2020-0006 · Cited by 3
On the Security of SSH Client Signatures
Bäumer, F., Brinkmann, M., Radoy, M., Schwenk, J., & Somorovsky, J. (2025) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3719027.3765079 · Cited by 3
Security and Effectiveness Analysis of the Gateway Integrity Checking Protocol
Lucena, M., & Fröhlich, A. A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2021.3058057 · Cited by 3
Pre-computation Scheme of Window $$\tau $$NAF for Koblitz Curves Revisited
Yu, W., & Xu, G. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77886-6_7 · Cited by 3
Abebe, A. T., Negash, Y., Abera, W. G., & Kumar, P. (2019) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15357-1_36 · Cited by 3
Encouraging the Adoption of Post-Quantum Hybrid Key Exchange in Network Security
Giron, A. A. (2021) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90022-9_18 · Cited by 3
Recommendation for Cryptographic Key GenerationPreprint
Barker, E. B. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-133r1-draft · Cited by 3
Self-citationEvaluating Thread, Zigbee and Z-Wave Against Common Criteria Cryptographic Requirements
Nannos, E., Katsoulis, S., Zantalis, F., Panagou, I. C., Boukouras, K., & Koulouras, G. (2026) · International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences (ASEC) · doi:10.3390/engproc2026124115 · Cited by 2
Security-Aware Design of Time-Critical Automotive Cyber-Physical Systems
Kukkala, V. K., Bradley, T. H., & Pasricha, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28016-0_4 · Cited by 2
Development and Evaluation of Bluetooth Low-Energy Device for Electronic Encounter Metrics
Keenan, K. E., Aumentado, J., Booth, H., Briggman, K. A., Kraft, M., Martin, M. N., Peralta, R., Robinson, A., Shalm, K., Stephens, M. S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.126.043 · Cited by 2
Lofù, D., Gennaro, P. D., Sorino, P., Noia, T. D., & Sciascio, E. D. (2022) · International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) · doi:10.1109/dessert58054.2022.10018797 · Cited by 2
Blockchain Cryptography: Part 2
Hellwig, D., Karlic, G., & Huchzermeier, A. (2020) · Management for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40142-9_7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, E., Chen, L., Roginsky, A., Vassilev, A., & Davis, R.
- Affiliations
- Information Technology Laboratory (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Published
- 2018-04
- OpenAlex
- W4298016935
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Funders
- Information Technology Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
- Keywords
- pairwise key establishment, key exchange, public-key cryptography, cryptographic standards, digital signatures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
