The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
L1 and L2 Glosses: Their Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the effectiveness of L1 and L2 glosses on incidental vocabulary learning in a multimedia environment.The investigation included the effects of additional pictorial cues in L1 and L2 glosses, and how these additions affect vocabulary learning.The analyses of a mixed design repeated measures 2 (L1, L2) X 2 (picture, no picture) X 2 (immediate test, delayed test) analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated no significant differences between L1 and L2 glosses for definition-supply and recognition tasks and showed significant differences between picture (text-plus-picture) and no-picture (textonly) glosses for definition-supply test only.The results also revealed significant interaction effects between languages and tests indicating that L1 and L2 groups showed different patterns of vocabulary retention over time.Findings suggest that both L1 and L2 glosses are effective for incidental vocabulary learning, but long-term retention may differ between the two types; and that the effect of additional visual cues on vocabulary learning may rely on the nature of the tasks given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · cited 5×
“With these results, Kroll & Stewart (1994) revised their model to include both the lexical links of the word association model and the conceptual links of the concept mediation model, and delineated the developmental shift through differentiation of the strength of the conceptual links.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition
CHUN, D. M., & PLASS, J. L. (1996) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x · Cited by 759
Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics
(1992) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4 · Cited by 375
Watanabe, Y. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226319700301x · Cited by 281
Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, F. C. (1994) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.1994.tb00049.x · Cited by 247
Cited by
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
Abraham, L. B. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802090246 · Cited by 294
Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor
Stockwell, G. (2007) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220701745817 · Cited by 288
Vocabulary learning through viewing video: the effect of two enhancement techniques
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1375960 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshii, M.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 85-101
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161583059
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: L1 and L2 Glosses: Their Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.64152/10125/44076
- The paper
- Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 Glosses: Their Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning & Technology. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
