Cited by 230Subtitles and Audiovisual MediaSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vocabulary learning through viewing video: the effect of two enhancement techniques

Montero Perez, Maribel, Peters, Elke, Desmet, Piet·2018·Computer Assisted Language Learning

Abstract

While most studies on L2 vocabulary learning through input have addressed learners’ vocabulary uptake from written text, this study focuses on audio-visual input. In particular, we investigate the effects of enhancing video by (1) adding different types of L2 subtitling (i.e. no captioning, full captioning, keyword captioning, and glossed keyword captioning which provides access to meaning) and (2) informing vs. not informing students that viewing would be followed immediately by a test of vocabulary from the video (Test Announcement). The study adopted a 2 (+/- Test Announcement) x 4 (Type of Captioning) between-subject design, resulting in 8 experimental groups. 227 Dutch-speaking university students watched three French (= L2) videos in one of eight conditions. Results revealed that students in the glossed keyword captions group (with access to meaning) scored best on the form recognition and meaning recall tests. Analyses of the look-up behaviour of students in the glossed keyword captioning group revealed that looking up a given word was positively related to the learning of that word. Test Announcement did not affect word learning or look-up behaviour. Participants’ vocabulary size was directly related to their learning gains as well as to their look-up behaviour in the glossed keyword condition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09588221.2017.1375960

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1080/09588220802090246 · DOI
  2. Anderson R.C., 1981, Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews, 77
  3. 10.3138/cmlr.56.1.31 · DOI
  4. Chai J., 2008, New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14, 25
  5. 10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · DOI · Paper page
  7. De Ridder I., 2002, Language Learning & Technology, 6, 123
  8. Ellis N.C., 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 211
  9. Field A., 2009, Discovering statistics using SPSS
  10. 10.1017/S0272263113000119 · DOI
  11. 10.1558/cj.v15i1-3.89-108 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Horst M., 1998, Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207
  13. 10.2190/RG06-LYWB-216Y-R27G · DOI
  14. 10.2307/328937 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau · DOI
  19. Laufer B., 2010, Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning, 15, 10.21832/9781847692900-003 · DOI
  20. Laufer B., 2000, Language Learning & Technology, 3, 58
  21. Laufer B., 2001, Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 549
  22. Lonsdale D., 2009, A frequency dictionary of French core vocabulary for learners, 10.4324/9780203883044 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb01344.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Montero Perez M., 2014, Language Learning & Technology, 18, 118
  25. 10.1111/modl.12215 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nation I. S. P., 2011, Researching and analyzing vocabulary
  27. 10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6_11 · DOI
  28. Peters E., 2007, Language Learning & Technology, 11, 36
  29. Peters E., 2007, Language Forum, 33, 45
  30. 10.1016/j.system.2016.10.002 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00502.x · DOI
  32. Peters E., 2015, Vocabulary acquisition through audio(-visual) input: how to measure learning gains
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00415.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1017/CBO9780511732942 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x · DOI
  36. 10.1177/1362168808089921 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Selva T., 2002, Proceedings of the Tenth EURALEX International Congress, 199
  38. Sharwood Smith M., 1991, Second Language Research, 7, 118
  39. 10.1017/S0272263109990039 · DOI
  40. Sydorenko T., 2010, Language Learning & Technology, 14, 50
  41. Tacq J., 1997, Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research: From problem to analysis
  42. 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1017/S027226319700301X · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1177/1362168810375371 · DOI
  45. Webb S., 2010, Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 201
  46. Webb S., 2015, Language learning beyond the classroom, 159
  47. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wesche M., 1996, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13, 10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Winke P., 2010, Language Learning & Technology, 14, 65
  50. Yoshii M., 2006, Language Learning & Technology, 10, 85
  51. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch12 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lin P. M. S., 2015, Language learning beyond the classroom, 149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Linguistics, KU Leuven, Belgium
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • IMEC (BE)
Venue
Computer Assisted Language Learning
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
31
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-3210
OpenAlex
W2753974104
Cited by
230
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
60.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Assisted Language Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
vocabulary acquisition, subtitling, audiovisual input, second language acquisition, French as a second language, vocabulary size, shape recognition, meaning recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review