The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism
Abstract
In From Counterculture to Cyberculture Fred Turner details the previously untold story of a highly influential group of San Francisco Bay Area entrepreneurs: Stewart Brand and the Whole Earth network. Between 1968 and 1998, via such familiar venues as the National Book Awardwinning Whole Earth Catalog, the computer-conferencing system known as WELL, and, ultimately, the launch of the wildly successful Wired magazine, Brand and his colleagues brokered a long-running collaboration between San Francisco flower power and the emerging technological hub of Silicon Valley. Thanks to their vision, counterculturalists and technologists alike joined together to reimagine computers as tools for personal liberation, the building of virtual and decidedly alternative communities, and the exploration of bold new social frontiers. While tracing the extraordinary transformation of how our networked culture came to be, Turners fascinating book reminds us that the distance between the Grateful Dead and Google, between Ken Kesey and the computer itself, is not as great as we might think. [Turner] postulates that Brand was an idealistic (albeit Barnum-esque) leader of a merry band of cybernetic pranksters who framed the concept of computers and the Internet with a seemingly nonintuitive twist: These one-time engines of government and big business had transmogrified into a social force associated with egalitarianism, personal empowerment, and the nurturing cocoon of community.Steven Levy, Bookforum Turner convincingly portrays a cadre of journalists who strove to transform the idea of the computer from a threat during the Cold War into a means of achieving personal freedom in an emerging digital uptopia.Paul Duguid, Times Literary Supplement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’
Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540509354673 · Cited by 2,075
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816676645 · Cited by 1,836
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
The cultural work of microwork
Irani, L. (2015) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813511926 · Cited by 568
Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design
Dantec, C. A. L., & DiSalvo, C. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312712471581 · Cited by 564
Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy
West, S. M. (2019) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317718185 · Cited by 488
Performing the sharing economy
Richardson, L. (2015) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.004 · Cited by 465
Sharon, T. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 · Cited by 428
The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms
Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W. (2017) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12493 · Cited by 379
Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy
Cockayne, D. G. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.005 · Cited by 277
Zuboff, S. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877221129290 · Cited by 209
Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-Right” Gaze
Massanari, A. L. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768302 · Cited by 156
Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity and the Corporate Life Hack
Slaby, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00266 · Cited by 157
Geiger, R. S. (2016) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1153700 · Cited by 125
Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation
Mcpherson, T. (2012) · Debates in the Digital Humanities · doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0017 · Cited by 108
The Case for Alternative Social Media
Gehl, R. W. (2015) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305115604338 · Cited by 96
The right to a human in the loop: Political constructions of computer automation and personhood
Jones, M. L. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717699716 · Cited by 75
Berg, S., & Hofmann, J. (2021) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2021.4.1612 · Cited by 64
Teh Internet Is Serious Business
de Zeeuw, D., & Tuters, M. (2020) · Cultural Politics · doi:10.1215/17432197-8233406 · Cited by 55
Ten Theses on Technology and Organization: Introduction to the Special Issue
Beyes, T., Chun, W. H. K., Clarke, J., Flyverbom, M., & Holt, R. (2022) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406221100028 · Cited by 44
Discourses of technology, ageing and participation
Fleming, A., Mason, C., & Paxton, G. (2018) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0107-7 · Cited by 42
Uri Geller and the reception of parapsychology in the 1970s
Green, J. O. (2018) · University of British Columbia · doi:10.14288/1.0368989
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, F.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W1505221106
- Cited by
- 1,818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 92.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.