Cited by 1,593Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement

Ioannidis, John P.A., Evans, Stephen J.W., Gøtzsche, Peter C., O'Neill, Robert T., Altman, Douglas G., Schulz, Kenneth, Moher, David, for the CONSORT Group*·2004·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

In response to overwhelming evidence and the consequences of poor-quality reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), many medical journals and editorial groups have now endorsed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement, a 22-item checklist and flow diagram. Because CONSORT primarily aimed at improving the quality of reporting of efficacy, only 1 checklist item specifically addressed the reporting of safety. Considerable evidence suggests that reporting of harms-related data from RCTs also needs improvement. Members of the CONSORT Group, including journal editors and scientists, met in Montebello, Quebec, Canada, in May 2003 to address this problem. The result is the following document: the standard CONSORT checklist with 10 new recommendations about reporting harms-related issues, accompanying explanation, and examples to highlight specific aspects of proper reporting. We hope that this document, in conjunction with other CONSORT-related materials (http://www.consort-statement.org), will help authors improve their reporting of harms-related data from RCTs. Better reporting will help readers critically appraise and interpret trial results. Journals can support this goal by revising Instructions to Authors so that they refer authors to this document.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Peloso PM, 1995, J Rheumatol, 22, 989
  2. Woodworth TG, 2001, J Rheumatol, 28, 1163
  3. Wallin J, 1981, Clin Ther, 3, 450
  4. 10.1001/jama.289.6.712 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–139 of 139

Metadata

Authors
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Evans, S. J. W., Gøtzsche, P. C., O'Neill, R. T., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group*
Affiliations
National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Ioannidis, John P.A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2004-11-16
Volume
141
Issue
10
Pages
781-788
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1986360186
Cited by
1,593
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 50
FWCI
62.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
CONSORT statement, harms reporting, safety reporting, randomized controlled trials, reporting quality, trial reporting checklist, adverse events, author guidelines, critical appraisal
MeSH terms
Publishing, Quality Control, Safety, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review