Cited by 91Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivational Enhancement Therapy with and without Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Treat Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although psychological issues can interfere with diabetes care, the effectiveness of psychological treatments in improving diabetes outcomes is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether motivational enhancement therapy with or without cognitive behavior therapy improves glycemic control in type 1 diabetes compared with usual care. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: 8 diabetes centers in London and Manchester, United Kingdom. PATIENTS: 344 adults with type 1 diabetes for longer than 2 years, with hemoglobin A(1c) levels of 8.2% to 15%, and without complications or severe comorbid disease. INTERVENTION: Nurse-delivered motivational enhancement therapy (4 sessions over 2 months), motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy (12 sessions over 6 months), or usual care. MEASUREMENTS: 12-month change in hemoglobin A(1c) levels (primary outcome), hypoglycemic events, depression, quality of life, fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes self-care activities, and body mass index (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: In an analysis including all randomly assigned patients, the 12-month change in hemoglobin A(1c) levels compared with usual care was -0.46% (95% CI, -0.81% to -0.11%) in the motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy group and -0.19% (CI, -0.53% to 0.16%) in the motivational enhancement therapy group alone. There was no evidence of treatment effects on secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Of 1659 screened patients, only 507 were eligible and 344 participated. Data on the primary outcome were unavailable for 11.3% of the participants. Study design did not permit distinction of the additive effect of cognitive behavior therapy plus motivational enhancement therapy from the effect of greater intensity and duration of the combined intervention compared with the motivational enhancement therapy alone. CONCLUSION: Nurse-delivered motivational enhancement therapy and cognitive behavior therapy is feasible for adults with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Combined therapy results in modest 12-month improvement in hemoglobin A(1c) levels compared with usual care, but motivational enhancement therapy alone does not.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00005

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rubak S, 2005, Br J Gen Pract, 55, 305
  2. Welch G, 2001, Diabetes, 50, 1663

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 91

Metadata

Authors
Ismail, K., Thomas, S. M., Maissi, E., Chalder, T., Schmidt, U., Bartlett, J., Patel, A., Dickens, C. M., Creed, F., & Treasure, J.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • From King's College London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, and the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2008-11-18
Volume
149
Issue
10
Pages
708-719
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2004352160
Cited by
91
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (01/17/05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, motivational enhancement therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, glycemic control, HbA1c, psychological intervention, hypoglycemia, diabetes self-care, depression, quality of life, fear of hypoglycemia
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nursing Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review