Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,951

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series

Schwabl, Philipp, Köppel, Sebastian, Königshofer, Philipp, Bucsics, Theresa, Trauner, Michael, Reiberger, Thomas, Liebmann, Bettina·2019·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Microplastics are ubiquitous in natural environments. Ingestion of microplastics has been described in marine organisms, whereby particles may enter the food chain. Objective: To examine human feces for the presence of microplastics to determine whether humans involuntarily ingest them. Design: Prospective case series in which participants completed a food diary and sampled stool according to step-by-step instructions. Setting: Europe and Asia. Participants: Eight healthy volunteers aged 33 to 65 years. Measurements: After chemical digestion, Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy was used to analyze the presence and shape of 10 common types of microplastic in stool samples. Results: All 8 stool samples tested positive for microplastics. A median of 20 microplastics (50 to 500 µm in size) per 10 g of human stool were identified. Overall, 9 plastic types were detected, with polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate being the most abundant. Limitations: There were few participants, and each provided only 1 sample. The origin and fate of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract were not investigated. Conclusion: Various microplastics were detected in human stool, suggesting inadvertent ingestion from different sources. Further research on the extent of microplastic intake and the potential effect on human health is needed. Primary Funding Source: None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m19-0618

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1038/s41561-018-0080-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/gcb.14020 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.047 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.091 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/srep46173 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03163 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0194970 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.3389/fchem.2018.00407 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1305882110 · DOI
  13. 10.1006/taap.2001.9240 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/srep03263 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4501 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Pauly JL, 1998, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 7, 419
  17. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.069 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.043 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.213 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.10.019 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1079/PNS2001134 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,951

Metadata

Authors
Schwabl, P., Köppel, S., Königshofer, P., Bucsics, T., Trauner, M., Reiberger, T., & Liebmann, B.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2019-10-01
Volume
171
Issue
7
Pages
453-457
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2972186294
Cited by
1,951
References
8
FWCI
38.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m19-0618
The paper
Schwabl, P., Köppel, S., Königshofer, P., Bucsics, T., Trauner, M., Reiberger, T., & Liebmann, B. (2019). Detection of Various Microplastics in Human Stool: A Prospective Case Series. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.