CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesFreedom of Expression and DefamationPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace

Open access
Ronald J. Deibert, Palfrey, John, Rohozinski, Rafal, Zittrain, Jonathan L.·2010·The MIT Press eBooks
DOI 10.7551/mitpress/8551.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Reports on a new generation of Internet controls that establish a new normative terrain in which surveillance and censorship are routine. Internet filtering, censorship of Web content, and online surveillance are increasing in scale, scope, and sophistication around the world, in democratic countries as well as in authoritarian states. The first generation of Internet controls consisted largely of building firewalls at key Internet gateways; China's famous “Great Firewall of China” is one of the first national Internet filtering systems. Today the new tools for Internet controls that are emerging go beyond mere denial of information. These new techniques, which aim to normalize (or even legalize) Internet control, include targeted viruses and the strategically timed deployment of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, surveillance at key points of the Internet's infrastructure, take-down notices, stringent terms of usage policies, and national information shaping strategies. Access Controlled reports on this new normative terrain. The book, a project from the OpenNet Initiative (ONI), a collaboration of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies, Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, and the SecDev Group, offers six substantial chapters that analyze Internet control in both Western and Eastern Europe and a section of shorter regional reports and country profiles drawn from material gathered by the ONI around the world through a combination of technical interrogation and field research methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/8551.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Reporters Without Borders, ''A Textbook Case in Press Censorship for the Past 20 Years,''

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Deibert, R. J., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. L.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2010-04-02
DOI
10.7551/mitpress/8551.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4254715066
Cited by
298
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.28
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
internet control, internet censorship, online surveillance, internet filtering, Great Firewall of China, DDoS attacks, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, democratic state, authoritarian state

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review