Cited by 11Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactDietary Effects on Health

Plant-Based Diets and Their Role in Preventive Medicine: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Insights for Reducing Disease Risk

Open access
Almuntashiri, Sultan A, Alsubaie, Faris F, Alotaybi, Moteab·2025·Cureus

Abstract

Plant-based diets have gained increasing attention for their potential role in preventive medicine, particularly in reducing the risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 32 longitudinal studies to evaluate the impact of plant-based diets on disease prevention and health outcomes. The review identifies consistent patterns, including improved metabolic health, weight management, cardiovascular risk reduction, and positive effects on gut microbiome composition and inflammation. However, inconsistencies arise due to variability in diet definitions, mixed findings on specific outcomes, and heterogeneity in study populations. Critical gaps in the literature include the lack of long-term studies, limited mechanistic insights, underrepresentation of diverse populations, and a need for more rigorous intervention studies and personalized nutrition approaches. Identified research gaps highlight the need for long-term studies, deeper exploration of mechanistic pathways, and greater inclusivity of diverse populations. These insights underscore the significance of plant-based diets as a cornerstone of preventive medicine while emphasizing the necessity for targeted interventions and personalized approaches to maximize their benefits. The findings contribute to a growing body of evidence supporting the integration of plant-based dietary strategies into public health policies and clinical practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.78629

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almuntashiri, S. A., Alsubaie, F. F., & Alotaybi, M.
Affiliations
  • King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA)
  • Ministry of Health (SA)
Corresponding author
Almuntashiri, Sultan A
Venue
Cureus
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
e78629-e78629
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407220421
Cited by
10
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
plant-based diet, preventive medicine, chronic disease prevention, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, metabolic syndrome, gut microbiota, inflammation, weight management, metabolic health, personalized nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review