Cited by 113Gastrointestinal motility and disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Long-term follow-up of internet-delivered exposure and mindfulness based treatment for irritable bowel syndrome

Ljótsson, Brjánn, Hedman, Erik, Lindfors, Perjohan, Hursti, Timo, Lindefors, Nils, Andersson, Gerhard, Rück, Christian·2011·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

We conducted a follow-up of a previously reported study of internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for IBS, based on exposure and mindfulness exercises (Ljótsson et al. (2010). Internet-delivered exposure and mindfulness based therapy for irritable bowel syndrome - a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 531-539). Seventy-five participants from the original sample of 85 (88%) reported follow-up data at 15-18 months (mean 16.4 months) after completing treatment. The follow-up sample included participants from both the original study's treatment group and waiting list after it had been crossed over to treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that treatment gains were maintained on all outcome measures, including IBS symptoms, quality of life, and anxiety related to gastrointestinal symptoms, with mainly large effect sizes (within-group Cohen's d=0.78-1.11). A total of fifty participants (59% of the total original sample; 52% of the original treatment group participants and 65% of the original waiting list participants) reported adequate relief of symptoms. Improvements at follow-up were more pronounced for the participants that had completed the full treatment and maintenance of improvement did not seem to be dependent on further treatment seeking. This study suggests that internet-delivered CBT based on exposure and mindfulness has long-term beneficial effects for IBS-patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ljótsson, B., Hedman, E., Lindfors, P., Hursti, T., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G., & Rück, C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Sabbatsberg Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ljótsson, Brjánn
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
58-61
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982189650
Cited by
113
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, quality of life, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Quality of Life, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Meditation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review