Most cited decision sciences papers
- Verified
Bikinis Instigate Generalized Impatience in Intertemporal Choice
Van den Bergh, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Cited by 269
- Verified
When should we use one-tailed hypothesis testing?
Ruxton, G. D., & Neuhäuser, M. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Cited by 269
- Verified
Creating value in online communities : the sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., & Orlikowski, W. (2016) · Information Systems Research
Knowledge Management and SharingDigital Platforms and Economics
Cited by 269
- Verified
Knowledge management: problems, promises, realities, and challenges
Fischer, G., & Otswald, J. (2001) · IEEE Intelligent Systems
Knowledge Management and TechnologyKnowledge Management and Sharing
Cited by 269
- Verified
Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items
Kreitchmann, R. S., Abad, F. J., Ponsoda, V., Nieto, M. D., & Morillo, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and Psychology
Cited by 269
- Verified · note
The Importance of Ease of Use, Usefulness, and Trust to Online Consumers: An Examination of the Technology Acceptance Model with Older Customers
McCloskey, D. W. (2006) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
Technology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology Use by Older Adults
Cited by 268
- Verified
Perceived fairness of yield management
Kimes, S. (2002) · The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly
Supply Chain and Inventory ManagementCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Cited by 268
- Verified
Beyond Trust: Web Site Design Preferences Across Cultures
Cyr, D., Bonanni, C., Bowes, J., & Ilsever, J. (2005) · Journal of Global Information Management
Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Cited by 268
- Verified
Can large language models replace humans in the systematic review process? Evaluating GPT-4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages
Khraisha, Q., Put, S., Kappenberg, J., Warraitch, A., & Hadfield, K. (2023) · arXiv
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Cited by 268
- Verified
Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsRisk Perception and Management
Cited by 268
- Verified
Deep learning and time series-to-image encoding for financial forecasting
Barra, S., Carta, S. M., Corriga, A., Podda, A. S., & Recupero, D. R. (2020) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Stock Market Forecasting MethodsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Cited by 267
- Verified
Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions—Results of Two Empirical Studies
Reinhardt, W., Schmidt, B., Sloep, P., & Drachsler, H. (2011) · Knowledge and Process Management
Personal Information Management and User BehaviorKnowledge Management and Sharing
Cited by 267
- Verified
Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings
Payzan-LeNestour, E., & Bossaerts, P. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Cited by 267
- Verified
When Do Losses Loom Larger than Gains?
Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research
Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Cited by 267
- Verified
Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review
Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024) · Administrative Sciences
Knowledge Management and SharingInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Cited by 267
- Verified
A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Cited by 266
- Verified
Sailing From the Seas of Chaos Into the Corridor of Stability: Practical Recommendations to Increase the Informational Value of Studies
Lakens, D., & Evers, E. R. K. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Cited by 266
- Verified
Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
van Assen, M. A. L. M., van Aert, R. C. M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015) · Psychological Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Cited by 265
- Verified
Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis
Maheswaran, H., Weich, S., Powell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2012) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Cited by 265
- Verified
Two-item PROMIS® global physical and mental health scales
Hays, R. D., Schalet, B. D., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2017) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Cited by 265
- Verified
Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: A systematic review
Dobrescu, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Klerings, I., Wagner, G., Persad, E., Sommer, I., Herkner, H., & Gartlehner, G. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Cited by 265
- Verified
CONCEPTS OF CULTURE‐FAIRNESS
THORNDIKE, R. L. (1971) · Journal of Educational Measurement
Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEducational Assessment and Pedagogy
Cited by 265
- Verified
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically
Sena, E. S., Currie, G. L., McCann, S. K., Macleod, M. R., & Howells, D. W. (2014) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice
Cited by 264
- Verified
Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane
Flemyng, E., Moore, T. H., Boutron, I., Higgins, J. P., Hróbjartsson, A., Nejstgaard, C. H., & Dwan, K. (2023) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research
Cited by 264
Go further with a free account
Verify every reference, keep papers in a library, and ask questions across them.
Sign up - it is free