Cited by 269Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Bikinis Instigate Generalized Impatience in Intertemporal Choice

Open access
Van den Bergh, Bram, Dewitte, Siegfried, Warlop, Luk·2008·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Neuroscientific studies demonstrate that erotic stimuli activate the reward circuitry processing monetary and drug rewards. Theoretically, a general reward system may give rise to nonspecific effects: exposure to “hot stimuli” from one domain may thus affect decisions in a different domain. We show that exposure to sexy cues leads to more impatience in intertemporal choice between monetary rewards. Highlighting the role of a general reward circuitry, we demonstrate that individuals with a sensitive reward system are more susceptible to the effect of sex cues, that the effect generalizes to nonmonetary rewards, and that satiation attenuates the effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/525505

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental manipulations can reduce delay discounting and impulsive choice, and some manipulations can increase them.

    “Ample evidence reveals that experimental manipulations can reduce delay discounting and impulsive choice (for reviews see Koffarnus, Jarmolowicz, Mueller, & Bickel, 2013; Rung & Madden, 2018a) or increase it (e.g., Van den Bergh, Dewitte, & Warlop, 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blanton, Hart and Meg Gerrard (1997), "Effect of Sexual Moti- vation on the Perceived Riskiness of a Sexual Encounter: There Must Be Fifty Ways to Justify a Lover," Health Psy- chology, 16 (4), 374-79.
  2. Giordano, Louis A., Warren K. Bickel, George Loewenstein, Eric A. Jacobs, Lisa Marsch, and Gary J. Badger. (2002), "Opioid Deprivation Affects How Opioid-Dependent Outpatients Dis- count the Value of Delayed Heroin and Money," Psycho- pharmacology, 163 (2), 174-82.
  3. Madden, Gregory J., Andrea M. Begotka, Bethany R. Raiff, and Lana L. Kastern (2003), "Delay Discounting of Real and Hy- pothetical Rewards," Experimental and Clinical Psychophar- macology, 11 (2), 139-45.
  4. Rook, Dennis W. and Meryl P. Gardner (1993), "In The Mood: Impulse Buying's Affective Antecedents," in Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 6, ed. Janeen Arnold-Costa and Russell Belk, Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van den Bergh, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2008-06
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
85-97
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2138201461
Cited by
269
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
intertemporal choice, impatience, erotic stimuli, reward systems, monetary rewards, satiation, impulsivity, domain generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review