Check decision sciences papers: citations, claims and retractions

Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI

Acar, F., Seurinck, R., Eickhoff, S. B., & Moerkerke, B. (2018) · PLOS ONE

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Cited by 154

Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol

Pollock, D., Tricco, A. C., Peters, M. D. J., Mclnerney, P. A., Khalil, H., Godfrey, C. M., Alexander, L. A., & Munn, Z. (2022) · JBI Evidence Synthesis

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

Cited by 154

Reducing debt improves psychological functioning and changes decision-making in the poor

Ong, Q., Theseira, W., & Ng, I. Y. H. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Cited by 154

Reproducible Computational Workflows with Continuous Analysis

Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., & Greene, C. S. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology

Scientific Computing and Data ManagementResearch Data Management Practices

Cited by 154

The adoption and diffusion of human resources information systems in Singapore

Teo, T. S. H., Lim, G. S., & Fedric, S. A. (2007) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

Technology Adoption and User BehaviourEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Cited by 153

Multivariate meta‐analysis

Nam, I., Mengersen, K., & Garthwaite, P. (2003) · Statistics in Medicine

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Cited by 153

AZ ÉSZLELT STRESSZ KÉRDŐÍV (PSS) MAGYAR VERZIÓJÁNAK JELLEMZŐI

STAUDER, A., & KONKOLY THEGE, B. (2006) · Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika

Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth and Well-being Studies

Cited by 153

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research.

Moher, D., Simera, I., Schulz, K. F., Hoey, J., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · BMC Medicine

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Cited by 153

Relational Systems of Preference with One or More Pseudo-Criteria: Some New Concepts and Results

Roy, B., & Vincke, P. (1984) · Management Science

Multi-Criteria Decision MakingGame Theory and Voting Systems

Cited by 153

Why do shoppers abandon shopping cart? Perceived waiting time, risk, and transaction inconvenience.

Rajamma, R. K., Paswan, A. K., & Hossain, M. M. (2009) · Journal of Product & Brand Management

Technology Adoption and User BehaviourConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Cited by 153

Performance‐Based Assessment: Implications of Task Specificity

Linn, R. L., & Burton, E. (1994) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Psychometric Methodologies and TestingTeacher Education and Assessments

Cited by 152

The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking

Stanovich, K. E. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks

Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Cited by 152

Warning: You are about to be Nudged

Loewenstein, G., Bryce, C., Hagmann, D., & Rajpal, S. (2015) · Behavioral Science & Policy

Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychology of Social Influence

Cited by 152

Failed Appointments

BARRON, W. M. (1980) · Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice

Healthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Cited by 152

Registration of observational studies: Is it time?

Williams, R. J., Tse, T., Harlan, W. R., & Zarin, D. A. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Cited by 152

The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials

Michelson, M., & Reuter, K. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Cited by 152

A comprehensive guideline for Bland–Altman and intra class correlation calculations to properly compare two methods of measurement and interpret findings

Haghayegh, S., Kang, H.-A., Khoshnevis, S., Smolensky, M. H., & Diller, K. R. (2020) · Physiological Measurement

Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Cited by 152

Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to appraise, conduct and publish reviews

Khan, K. S., & Zamora, J. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Cited by 151

Considering the methodological limitations in the evidence base of antidepressants for depression: a reanalysis of a network meta-analysis

Munkholm, K., Paludan-Müller, A. S., & Boesen, K. (2019) · BMJ Open

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsTreatment of Major Depression

Cited by 151

National Culture and Information Technology Product Adoption

Bagchi, K., Hart, P., & Peterson, M. F. (2004) · Journal of Global Information Technology Management

Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCultural Differences and Values

Cited by 151

Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance

Büchter, R. B., Weise, A., & Pieper, D. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

Cited by 151

Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review

Moher, D., Weeks, L., Ocampo, M., Seely, D., Sampson, M., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Miller, D., Simera, I., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementation

Cited by 151

Evaluating the perceived stress scale among UK university students: implications for stress measurement and management

Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., Dhingra, K., & Grogan, S. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education

Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStudent Stress and Coping

Cited by 151

A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain

Yates, S. L., Morley, S., Eccleston, C., & de C. Williams, A. C. (2005) · Pain

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

Cited by 150