Cited by 172Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Food Price and Diet and Health Outcomes: 20 Years of the CARDIA Study

Open access
Duffey, Kiyah J.·2010·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite surging interest in taxation as a policy to address poor food choice, US research directly examining the association of food prices with individual intake is scarce. METHODS: This 20-year longitudinal study included 12 123 respondent days from 5115 participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Associations between food price, dietary intake, overall energy intake, weight, and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were assessed using conditional log-log and linear regression models. RESULTS: The real price (inflated to 2006 US dollars) of soda and pizza decreased over time; the price of whole milk increased. A 10% increase in the price of soda or pizza was associated with a -7.12% (95% confidence interval [CI], -63.50 to -10.71) or -11.5% (95% CI, -17.50 to -5.50) change in energy from these foods, respectively. A $1.00 increase in soda price was also associated with lower daily energy intake (-124 [95% CI, -198 to -50] kcal), lower weight (-1.05 [95% CI, -1.80 to -0.31] kg), and lower HOMA-IR score (0.42 [95% CI, -0.60 to -0.23]); similar trends were observed for pizza. A $1.00 increase in the price of both soda and pizza was associated with greater changes in total energy intake (-181.49 [95% CI, -247.79 to -115.18] kcal), body weight (-1.65 [95% CI, -2.34 to 0.96] kg), and HOMA-IR (-0.45 [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.31]). CONCLUSION: Policies aimed at altering the price of soda or away-from-home pizza may be effective mechanisms to steer US adults toward a more healthful diet and help reduce long-term weight gain or insulin levels over time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.545

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]Mincer J Market prices, oppurtunity costs, and income effects Christ CF Friedman M Goodman LA Measurement in economics: studies in mathematical economics and econometrics in memory of Yehuda Grunfeld Stanford, CA Stanford University Press 1963
  2. [44]Warner K Tobacco policy in the United States: lessons for the obesity epidemic Mechanic D Rogut L Colby D Knickman J Policy Challenges in Modern Health Care New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers University Press 2005 99 114

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duffey, K. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Duffey, Kiyah J.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2010-03-08
Volume
170
Issue
5
Pages
420
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028755683
Cited by
172
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
54.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95095-66-0-1, 2r24hd050924-06, n01hc48050-59-0-1, n01hc48048-58-0-1, n01hc48047-55-0-1, n01hc48049-61-0-1)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R136EH000308-01, R36EH000308)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA12162, R01AA012162)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01HC48050, N01 HC 95095, N01 HC048048, N01-HC-048049, N01 HC095095, N01 HC048050, N01-HC48048, N01-HC-48-049, N01 HC048047, N01-HC-480-47)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA121152, R01CA109831)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK56350, DK-056350, P30DK056350)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES10126), P30ES010126)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD044263, R24 HD-050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food prices, food taxation, soft drinks, pizza, energy intake, body weight, insulin resistance, dietary intake, food choice, CARDIA study, weight gain
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Carbonated Beverages, Coronary Disease, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Health Policy, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Resource Allocation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review