Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 563

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatments of Depression and the Functional Capacity to Work

Mintz, Jim·1992·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100005001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of antidepressants and psychotherapy on work impairment in depressed patients. Original databases from 10 published treatment studies were compiled and analyzed (N = 827). Functional work impairment was common at baseline, manifested by unemployment (11%) or on-the-job performance problems (absenteeism, decreased productivity, interpersonal problems, 44%). Generally, work outcomes were good when treatment was symptomatically effective, but the trajectories of work restoration and symptom remission were different, with work recovery appearing to take considerably longer. Relapse was an important determinant of long-term occupational outcome, particularly for seriously ill patients for whom relapse meant rehospitalization or other profound social disruption. Affective impairment was distinguished from functional impairment, with the former characterizing milder depression and the latter characterizing moderate to severe depression. Some methodological recommendations are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100005001

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mintz, J.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
761
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100005001
OpenAlex
W2162966898
Cited by
563
References
6
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.