Cited by 201Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Anhedonia predicts poor psychosocial functioning: results from a large cohort of patients treated for major depressive disorder by general practitioners

Vinckier, F., Gourion, D., Mouchabac, S.·2017·European Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anhedonia is a core symptom of major depression and a key prognostic factor that is often poorly explored in clinical trials of major depressive disorder (MDD). Beyond symptomatic remission, psychosocial functioning also reveals difficulty in achieving remission in patients with MDD. The main objective of this study was to explore the interrelationships between social functioning and anhedonia on a longitudinal basis. METHODS: In total, 1570 outpatients treated for MDD with agomelatine were included. Severity of depression and levels of anhedonia and of psychosocial functioning were assessed at inclusion and at 10-14 weeks, with specific standardized scales (MADRS, QFS, SHAPS, CGI). Multivariate regression and mediation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Using multivariate regression, we showed that improvement of anhedonia was the strongest predictor of improvement in psychosocial functioning (odds ratio=7.3 [4.3-12.1] P<0.0001). In addition, mediation tests confirmed that the association between improvement of depressive symptoms and improvement of social functioning was significantly underpinned by the improvement of anhedonia over time. Finally, we explored the determinants of the dissociation of the response, i.e., the persistence of psychosocial dysfunctioning despite a symptomatic response to antidepressant treatment, which remains a widespread situation in clinical practice. We showed that this dissociation was strongly predicted by persistence of anhedonia. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that anhedonia is one of the strongest predictors of psychosocial functioning, along with symptomatic remission, and should be carefully assessed by health professionals, in order to optimize pharmacological as well as non-pharmacological management of depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.02.485

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvement of anhedonia is a strong predictor for improvement in psychosocial functioning.

    “and improvement of anhedonia is a strong predictor for improvement in psychosocial functioning (Vinckier et al., 2017).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Vinckier et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinckier, F., Gourion, D., & Mouchabac, S.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Vinckier, F.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2017-07
Volume
44
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2592834759
Cited by
201
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anhedonia, major depressive disorder, psychosocial functioning, social functioning, agomelatine, antidepressant response, prognostic factors, general practitioners, mediation analysis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Severity of Illness Index, Social Adjustment, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, General Practitioners, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review