CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 326Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Lifetime History of Major Depression in Women: Reliability of Diagnosis and Heritability

Kendler, Kenneth S.·1993·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230054003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In epidemiologic samples, the assessment of lifetime history (LTH) of major depression (MD) is not highly reliable. In female twins, we previously found that LTH of MD, as assessed at a single personal interview, was moderately heritable (approximately 40%). In that analysis, errors of measurement could not be discriminated from true environmental effects. METHODS: In 1721 female twins from a population-based register, including both members of 742 pairs, LTH of MD, covering approximately the same time period, was obtained twice, once by self-administered questionnaire and once at personal interview. RESULTS: Reliability of LTH of MD was modest (kappa = +.34, tetrachoric r = +.56) and was predicted by the number of depressive symptoms, treatment seeking, number of episodes, and degree of impairment. Deriving an "index of caseness" from these predictors, the estimated heritability of LTH of MD was greater for more restrictive definitions. Incorporating error of measurement into a structural equation model including both occasions of measurement, the estimated heritability of the liability to LTH of MD increased substantially (approximately 70%). More than half of what was considered environmental effects when LTH of MD was analyzed on the basis of one assessment appeared, when two assessments were used, to reflect measurement error. CONCLUSIONS: Major depression, as assessed over the lifetime, may be a rather highly heritable disorder of moderate reliability rather than a moderately heritable disorder of high reliability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230054003

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kendler, K. S.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendler, Kenneth S.
ORCID
Kendler, Kenneth S.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1993-11-01
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
863
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230054003
OpenAlex
W2049890864
Cited by
326
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, women, twin studies, heritability, measurement error, reliability statistics, depressive symptoms, treatment seeking, depressive episodes, environmental effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Models, Genetic, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personality Inventory, Probability, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Episode of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review