Cited by 202Mental Health Treatment and AccessGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Assortative mating for major psychiatric diagnoses in two population-based samples

MAES, H. H. M., NEALE, M. C., KENDLER, K. S., HEWITT, J. K., SILBERG, J. L., FOLEY, D. L., MEYER, J. M., RUTTER, M. +3 more·1998·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on assortment for psychiatric disorders have reported discrepant findings. We aimed to test whether there is a significant association for psychiatric diagnoses, including alcoholism, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, panic disorder and phobias between husbands and wives in two population-based samples. We further evaluated whether marital resemblance occurs primarily within or across psychiatric disorders and if assortment for psychopathology is primary or secondary to assortment for correlated variables. METHODS: A model for mate selection addressed whether the correlation between mates for psychiatric disorders arises from direct assortment (primary homogamy) or through correlation with other variables for which assortment occurs (secondary homogamy) or through cross-variable assortment. The model accounted for within-person co-morbidity as well as across-spouse data. RESULTS: Findings suggested that a moderate degree of assortment exists both within and across psychiatric diagnoses. Only a small amount of the observed marital resemblance for mental illness could be explained by assortment for correlated variables such as age, religious attendance and education. Similar results were obtained for the two samples separately and confirmed in their joint analysis, revealing that the co-morbidity and assortment findings, except for the marital correlation for age, religious attendance and education, replicate across samples. CONCLUSIONS: Significant but moderate primary assortment exists for psychiatric disorders. The bias in twin studies that have ignored the small amount of assortment is negligible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291798007326

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MAES, H. H. M., NEALE, M. C., KENDLER, K. S., HEWITT, J. K., SILBERG, J. L., FOLEY, D. L., MEYER, J. M., RUTTER, M., SIMONOFF, E., PICKLES, A., & EAVES, L. J.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1998-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1389-1401
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2128837088
Cited by
202
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01hl048148-01a1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-48148)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH45268, R01MH040828, MH 40828, R01MH045268)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
assortative mating, mental illness, alcoholism, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, phobia, comorbidities, mate choice
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Models, Genetic, Social Environment, Comorbidity, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review