Cited by 563Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Long-term Outcomes Following Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Open access
Nygaard, Ingrid, Brubaker, Linda, Zyczynski, Halina M., Cundiff, Geoffrey, Richter, Holly, Gantz, Marie, Fine, Paul, Menefee, Shawn +5 more·2013·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: More than 225 000 surgeries are performed annually in the United States for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is considered the most durable POP surgery, but little is known about safety and long-term effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To describe anatomic and symptomatic outcomes up to 7 years after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and to determine whether these are affected by concomitant anti-incontinence surgery (Burch urethropexy). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Long-term follow-up of the randomized, masked 2-year Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial of women with stress continence who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy between 2002 and 2005 for symptomatic POP and also received either concomitant Burch urethropexy or no urethropexy. Ninety-two percent (215/233) of eligible 2-year CARE trial completers were enrolled in the extended CARE study; and 181 (84%) and 126 (59%) completed 5 and 7 years of follow-up, respectively. The median follow-up was 7 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Symptomatic POP failure requiring retreatment or self-reported bulge; or anatomic POP failure requiring retreatment or Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification evaluation demonstrating descent of the vaginal apex below the upper third of the vagina, or anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse beyond the hymen. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with more than 1 symptom or interval treatment; or overall UI score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index. RESULTS: By year 7, the estimated probabilities of treatment failure (POP, SUI, UI) from parametric survival modeling for the urethropexy group and the no urethropexy group, respectively, were 0.27 and 0.22 for anatomic POP (treatment difference of 0.050; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.271), 0.29 and 0.24 for symptomatic POP (treatment difference of 0.049; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.162), 0.48 and 0.34 for composite POP (treatment difference of 0.134; 95% CI, -0.096 to 0.322), 0.62 and 0.77 for SUI (treatment difference of -0.153; 95% CI, -0.268 to 0.030), and 0.75 and 0.81 for overall UI (treatment difference of -0.064; 95% CI, -0.161 to 0.032). Mesh erosion probability at 7 years (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.8% to 16.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: During 7 years of follow-up, abdominal sacrocolpopexy failure rates increased in both groups. Urethropexy prevented SUI longer than no urethropexy. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy effectiveness should be balanced with long-term risks of mesh or suture erosion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00099372.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2013.4919

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nygaard, I., Brubaker, L., Zyczynski, H. M., Cundiff, G., Richter, H., Gantz, M., Fine, P., Menefee, S., Ridgeway, B., Visco, A., Warren, L. K., Zhang, M., & Meikle, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
309
Issue
19
Pages
2016
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2092649725
Cited by
563
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 17
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD041261, U10HD054136, U10HD054214, U01HD041249, U10HD054215, U10HD069006, U10HD041263, U01HD069031, U10HD041267, U10HD054241, U10HD041250, UG1HD041267)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
abdominal sacrocolpopexy, pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, long-term surgical outcomes, prolapse recurrence, anti-incontinence surgery, CARE trial, pelvic floor dysfunction, women's health surgery, treatment failure, survival analysis, Incontinence Severity Index, POP-Q
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Risk, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Urethra, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Longitudinal Ligaments, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Floor Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review