The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Ultraprocessed foods (UPF) are widespread in Western diets. Their consumption has been associated in recent prospective studies with increased risks of all-cause mortality and chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; however, data regarding diabetes are lacking. Objective: To assess the associations between consumption of UPF and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based prospective cohort study, 104 707 participants aged 18 years or older from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort (2009-2019) were included. Dietary intake data were collected using repeated 24-hour dietary records (5.7 per participant on average), designed to register participants' usual consumption for more than 3500 different food items. These were categorized according to their degree of processing by the NOVA classification system. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations between UPF consumption and risk of T2D were assessed using cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for known risk factors (sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, medical history, and nutritional factors). Results: A total of 104 707 participants (21 800 [20.8%] men and 82 907 [79.2%] women) were included. Mean (SD) baseline age of participants was 42.7 (14.5) years. Absolute T2D rates in the lowest and highest UPF consumers were 113 and 166 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. Consumption of UPF was associated with a higher risk of T2D (multi-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for an absolute increment of 10 in the percentage of UPF in the diet, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25; median follow-up, 6.0 years; 582 252 person-years; 821 incident cases). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for several markers of the nutritional quality of the diet, for other metabolic comorbidities (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23), and for weight change (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27). The absolute amount of UPF consumption (grams per day) was consistently associated with T2D risk, even when adjusting for unprocessed or minimally processed food intake (HR for a 100 g/d increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large observational prospective study, a higher proportion of UPF in the diet was associated with a higher risk of T2D. Even though these results need to be confirmed in other populations and settings, they provide evidence to support efforts by public health authorities to recommend limiting UPF consumption. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03335644.
Checked 2026-10-10 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In the French NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort, higher ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption was associated with increased type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. The association persisted after adjustment for diet quality, metabolic comorbidities, and weight change.
Key findings
- Among 104,707 participants, 821 incident T2D cases occurred over 582,252 person-years (median follow-up 6.0 years).
- Each 10-point increment in the percentage of UPF in the diet was associated with T2D risk: Model 1 HR, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.25); after further adjustment for metabolic comorbidities, HR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.03-1.23); after adjustment for weight change, HR, 1.13 (95% CI, 1.01-1.27).
- Absolute UPF consumption was also associated with T2D risk: HR for a 100 g/d increase, 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02-1.08), even when adjusting for unprocessed/minimally processed food intake.
- The proportion of unprocessed/minimally processed foods was inversely associated with T2D risk: HR for a 10-point increment, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.98). Absolute T2D rates were 113 and 166 per 100,000 person-years in the lowest and highest UPF consumers, respectively.
Methods
- Population-based prospective cohort study using the French NutriNet-Santé cohort (2009-2019); 104,707 adults aged 18 years or older were included (21,800 men [20.8%] and 82,907 women [79.2%]; mean [SD] baseline age, 42.7 [14.5] years).
- Dietary intake was collected with repeated validated web-based 24-hour dietary records (5.7 per participant on average) covering more than 3500 food items; foods were categorized by degree of processing using the NOVA classification.
- Cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with age as timescale and left truncation assessed UPF proportion and T2D incidence, treating T2D and death as competing events; models adjusted for sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, medical history, and nutritional factors, with multiple imputation for missing data.
Limitations
- The paper states that T2D case ascertainment exhaustiveness could not be guaranteed, with about 20% of T2D cases estimated to be underdiagnosed in France, likely reducing statistical power and potentially underestimating associations.
- The paper states that causation cannot be established from this single observational study and residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out; NOVA misclassification and the broad, heterogeneous UPF category are also noted as limitations.
- The paper states that participants were younger, more often women, more educated, and had healthier dietary habits than the general French population, with lower T2D incidence, which may have limited statistical power, especially for stratified analyses such as in men.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consumption of UPF was associated with a higher risk of T2D (multi-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for an absolute increment of 10 in the percentage of UPF in the diet, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25;median follow-up, 6.0 years; 582 252 person-years; 821 incident cases).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Ultraprocessed food intake was associated with an increased T2D risk (Model 1: HR for a 10-point increment in the percentage of UPF in the diet, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25;P = .001).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In this large cohort, UPF consumption was associated with increased T2D risk.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During follow-up (582 252 person-years; median follow-up time, 6.0 years; interquartile range [IQR], 2.8-8.4 years), 821 incident T2D cases were detected.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 821Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for several markers of the nutritional quality of the diet, for other metabolic comorbidities (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23),and for weight change (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The associations remained significant after further adjust- ments for Model 2, 3, 4, and 5 covariates (Table 3).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportion of unprocessed/minimally processed foods in the diet was inversely associated with T2D risk (HR for a 10-point increment, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98;P = .01;[Model 1 covariates]).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The absolute amount of UPF consumption (grams per day) was consistently associated with T2D risk, even when adjusting for unprocessed or minimally processed food intake (HR for a 100 g/d increase, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08).”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“The absolute amount of UPF consumption in grams per day was consistently associated with T2D risk, even when ad- justing for the absolute amount (in g/d) of unprocessed/ minimally processed food intake (HR for a 100 g/d increase in UPF consumption, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P = .003).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest an association between UPF consumption and T2D risk.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Sodium intake, mg/1000 kcal/d | 1479.10 (369.21) | 6.97 (1.20) | <.001 |”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Alcohol intake, g/1000 kcal/d | 3.91 (5.53) | -0.50 (0.02) | <.001 |”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Whole grains, g/1000 kcal/d | 18.96 (24.36) | -3.14 (0.08) | <.001 |”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Fiber, g/1000 kcal/d | 10.72 (3.57) | -0.78 (0.01) | <.001 |”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 21
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportions of UPF in beverages, sugary products, fats/ sauces, and dairy products were more specifically associated with increased T2D risk (eTable 2 in the Supplement).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Absolute incidence rates for T2D in the whole population were 132 per 100 000 personyears; age and sex corrected absolute rates were 113, 125, 143 and 166 per 100 000 person-years in the first quarter (lowest con-sumers), second, third, and fourth quarter (highest consumers) of the proportion of UPF intake in the diet, respectively.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although HRs were in the same direction, this association was significant in women only, but statistical power was reduced for men (eTable 1 in the Supple- ment).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Higher consumption of UPF was associated with higher FSAm-NPS DI scores (reflecting a poorer nutritional quality of the diet), higher intakes of energy, SFA, sodium and sugar, lower intakes of fiber and alcohol, higher consumptions of sugary drinks and red and processed meats, and lower consumptions of whole grains, yogurt, nuts, and fruits and vegetables (Table 2).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean weight contribution of UPF to the diet was 17.3%.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 707Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 104 707 participants (21 800 [20.8%] men and 82 907 [79.2%] women) were included.Mean (SD) baseline age of participants was 42.7 (14.5) years.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“A total of 104 707 participants (21 800 [20.8%] men and 82 907 [79.2%] women) were included.Mean (SD) baseline age of participants was 42.7 (14.5) years.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 707Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, UPF proportions were higher in younger participants, obese individuals, those with lower physical activity levels, and current smokers (Table 1).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Furthermore, T2D incidence was lower (186 cases per 100 000 personyears in our sample after standardization vs 289 per 100 000 in the French population 78 ), thereby limiting statistical power, especially for some stratified analyses (eg, in men).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 186Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Only 1304 participants had a null follow-up and were excluded.Some of them may have had T2D that was not detected thereafter.However, this should represent a small number of missed cases (<20 cases considering T2D incidence in France 78 ) and, owing to the prospective design, the resulting potential misclassification bias was most likely nondifferential and rather resulted in an underestima-tion”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedn = 20Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The NutriNet-Santé web-based selfadministered 24-hour dietary records have been tested and validated against an interview by a trained dietitian, 47 and against blood and urinary biomarkers.48,49”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Dietary Data and Food Processing Categorization
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even if a causal link between UPF and chronic diseases cannot be established so far, the accumulation of consistent data leads public health authorities in several countries such as France 82 or Brazil 83 to recommend privileging the consumption of unprocessed/minimally processed foods, and limiting the consumption of UPF in the name of the precautionary principle.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82]
- Not checked yetcites [83]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants were asked to declare major health events though the yearly health questionnaire, through a specific health check-up questionnaire every 3 months, or at any time through a specific interface on the study website.They were also asked to declare all currently taken medications and treatments via the check-up and yearly questionnaires.In addition, data are linked to medico-administrative”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Case Ascertainment
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though we used a multisource case ascertainment approach, exhaustiveness could not be guaranteed.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, misclassification bias in the NOVA cannot be ruled out; however, this would have led to a nondifferential measurement error (in cases and noncases), and potentially biasing toward the null hypothesis.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Of note, energy balance and overweight are both associated with T2D risk.3”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Many food groups, mostly ultraprocessed (eg, processed meat, and sugary sweetened beverages) are recognized T2D risk factors.3”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Associations between UPF consumption and risk of T2Dwere assessed using cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for known risk factors (sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, medical history, and nutritional factors).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Multiple imputation for missing data was performed using the multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) method.53”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Statistical Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“About 20% of T2D cases are estimated to be underdiagnosed in France.78 This probably resulted in a loss of statistical power.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, the exposure to bisphenol-A (BPA), a hydrophobic substance of very high concern, 66 having endocrine disrupting properties, as well as high BPA serum concentrations, have been associated with increased T2D risk in recent meta-analyses.29,67”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overall, UPF usually have a lower nutritional quality 35 because they are on average richer in sodium, energy, fat, sugar, and poorer in fiber [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]25 and often exhibit a higher glycemic index.61”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35]
- Not checked yetcites [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]25
- Not checked yetcites [61] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth, the ultraprocessed category covers diverse products; this exploratory approach was not designed to focus on a specific food category or to isolate a particular process/additive.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was approved by the relevant institutional review boards (Inserm and Cnil).Participants provided electronic informed consent.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Study Population and Data Collection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To our knowledge, although UPF consumption was previously found to be associated with increased risks of cancer, 31 cardiovascular diseases, 35 mortality, 32,36 depressive symptoms, 33,37 and metabolic disorders (obesity, 40 hypertension, 41 and dyslipidemia 39 ), no prior prospective epidemiological study had evaluated their association with T2D risk.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Cox model assumptions were verified (eFigures 2 and 3 in the Supplement).”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Statistical Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, causation could not be established from this single observational study and residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Consistently, in a 1-month randomized clinical trial, 63 an ultraprocessed diet vs an unprocessed one led to an increased energy intake, which was highly correlated with weight gain.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, compared with the general French population, participants to this study were younger, more often women, with higher educational levels 80 and healthier dietary habits.81 This might have underestimated the associations owing to a narrower range of UPF intake.”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Limitations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80]
- Not checked yetcites [81]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, 2 meta-analyses observed associations between T2D risk and the intakes of nonnutritive sweeteners and artificially sweetened beverages.28,66”
§ Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Participants of the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28]
- Not checked yetcites [66] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
No prior large-scale prospective study had evaluated the association between UPF consumption and T2D risk before this study.
“However, no such large-scale prospective study has been conducted regarding T2D.”
“no prior prospective epidemiological study had evaluated their association with T2D risk.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The level of processing per se as an independent risk factor, comes from a randomised controlled trial finding that an ultra-processed diet relative to an unprocessed one causes excessive calorie intake and weight gain 57 , and three cohort studies showing an association between UPF consumption and weight gain, obesity, type-2 diabetes or hypertension risk, which remains significant after”
From Ultra‐processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity
CRAIG, C. L., MARSHALL, A. L., SJ??STR??M, M., BAUMAN, A. E., BOOTH, M. L., AINSWORTH, B. E., PRATT, M., EKELUND, U., YNGVE, A., SALLIS, J. F., et al. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb · Cited by 21,619
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,379
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Ultra-processed foods: What they are and how to identify them
Monteiro, C. A., Cannon, G., Levy, R. B., Moubarac, J.-C., Louzada, M. L., Rauber, F., Khandpur, N., Cediel, G., Neri, D., Martinez-Steele, E., et al. (2019) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980018003762 · Cited by 2,964
Self-citationMultiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification
van Buuren, S. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206074463 · Cited by 2,827
The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing
Monteiro, C. A., Cannon, G., Moubarac, J.-C., Levy, R. B., Louzada, M. L. C., & Jaime, P. C. (2018) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980017000234 · Cited by 2,333
Self-citationHall, K. D., Ayuketah, A., Brychta, R., Cai, H., Cassimatis, T., Chen, K. Y., Chung, S. T., Costa, E., Courville, A., Darcey, V., et al. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008 · Cited by 1,971
Ultra‐processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system
Monteiro, C. A., Moubarac, J. ‐., Cannon, G., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. (2013) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12107 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–458 of 458
The Association between HIV and Obesity: Causes, Comorbidities and Future Directions
Caster, M., Fletcher, A. A., & Habr, M. J. (2025) · Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports · doi:10.1007/s12170-025-00772-x
“In the general population, high consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [18, 19].”
Rodrigues, L. C., Caldeira, T. C. M., Miranda, C., Veiga, I. P. A., de Sousa, T. M., & Claro, R. M. (2025) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171251374739
Foodomics in Diabetes Management: A New Approach
Maqsood, S., Arshad, M. T., Ikram, A., Al-Aoh, H. A. N., & Gnedeka, K. T. (2025) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.71021
Hemade, A., & Salameh, P. (2025) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000045027
“[8,9] Such findings under-score the multifaceted biological and behavioral pathways – hyperpalatability, disruption of satiety signaling, and fructose-driven de novo lipogenesis – through which UPFs heighten disease risk.”
Malone, A., Tibbe, T. D., Turk, N., Duru, O. K., Wisk, L. E., Mangione, C. M., Page, J., Thomas, S., VU, A. V., Madievsky, R., et al. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17213360 · Cited by 1
“Consumption of ultra-processed foods, for example, has been recently linked to increased T2D risk [3,5,7,26].”
The battle over “food addiction”. Translation into Russian
Lustig, R. H. (2025) · Психофармакология и биологическая наркология · doi:10.17816/phbn691855
Handgrip strength cut-off points for identifying French adults at risk of type 2 diabetes
Nguyen, T. C. P., Oppert, J., Bourhis, L., Bellicha, A., Srour, B., Kesse‐Guyot, E., Herçberg, S., Galan, P., Touvier, M., Fezeu, L., et al. (2025) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2025.101713
Self-citationRíos, O. G. V., Muchotrigo, M. Y., Aguirre-Lucich, J., Salazar, A. O. R., Lozano, A. L. M., Contreras, R. M., Ponte-Valverde, S. I., & Rojas, J. S. (2025) · Nutrición clínica y dietética hospitalaria/Nutrición clínica, dietética hospitalaria · doi:10.12873/454valderrama
“…una relación positiva y significativa entre el consumo de AUP y el riesgo de DM en familiares de pacientes diabéticos, coincidiendo con Chen et al 16 , y Srour et al 21 , quienes reportaron que un aumento del 10% en la in-gesta de AUP eleva el riesgo de DM2 en 12% y 15%, respec-tivamente.”
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582533
Duan, M.-J., Vinke, P. C., Navis, G. J., Corpeleijn, E., & Dekker, L. H. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.18318233
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582515
Egnell, M., Galan, P., Fialon, M., Touvier, M., Péneau, S., Kesse‐Guyot, E., Herçberg, S., & Julia, C. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14234598
Self-citationRicket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582527
Egnell, M., Galan, P., Fialon, M., Touvier, M., Péneau, S., Kesse‐Guyot, E., Herçberg, S., & Julia, C. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14234601
Self-citationRicket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582542
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582518
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582539
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582521
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582536
Zhong, G.-C., Gu, H.-T., Peng, Y., Wang, K., Wu, Y., Hu, T.-Y., Jing, F.-C., & Hao, F.-B. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13710376
Canhada, S., Vigo, Á., Levy, R., Luft, V. C., da Fonseca, M. D. J. M., Giatti, L., Molina, M. D. C. B., Duncan, B. B., & Schmidt, M. I. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26640292
Obesity and its association with ultra-processed food consumption in older adults in Roraima, Brazil
dos Santos, G. R., Ribeiro, G. J. S., Bim, M. A., Miranda, C. C., Pelegrini, A., & Pinto, A. D. A. (2025) · Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública · doi:10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e358188
Ricket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582524
Deschasaux, M., Srour, B., Bourhis, L., Arnault, N., Druesne‐Pecollo, N., Esseddik, Y., de Edelenyi, F. S., Allègre, J., Allès, B., Andreeva, V. A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17097985
Self-citationRicket, I. M., Brown, J. R., MacKenzie, T. A., Ma, Y., Grewal, D., Ailawadi, K. L., & Emond, J. A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21582530
Peut-on repérer les aliments ultratransformés ?
DELCOURT, A., & Crea, F. (2025) · Pratiques en nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.pranut.2025.09.007
Manufactured Satiety-Disrupting Foods: A Framework for Classification and Policy Intervention
Mayers, C. (2025) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17859488
Madueño, A. S. P., Capistrano, S. N. T., Rutti, Y. Y. G., et al. (2025) · Nutrición clínica y dietética hospitalaria/Nutrición clínica, dietética hospitalaria · doi:10.12873/454pajuelo
Ultra-processed foods consumption associated with food addiction in Chilean young adults
Díaz, X., Valenzuela, C. A., Valenzuela, M., & Gearhardt, A. N. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1722589
“Evidence from longitudinal studies has established associations between UPF consumption and obesity, as well as related health issues, such as cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome (5–8).”
Thoughts on dietary interventions for metabolic syndrome (MetS) in an era of metabolic heterogeneity
Tang, W. (2026) · BioScience Trends · doi:10.5582/bst.2026.01055
Lifestyle interventions: Exercise, nutrition and diabetes prevention in aging
Mehjabin, S., Akanda, M. K. M., Hasan, A. H. M. N., & Mosaddik, A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44665-8.00025-0
Food processing and risk of non-communicable diseases : findings from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
Srour, B. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a836731az0f9cz4c79zb114z5fe899d59164
Self-citationAliments ultra-transformés – définition et risque de maladies non transmissibles
Delarue, J., & Gall, M. L. (2026) · Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine · doi:10.1016/j.banm.2025.10.015
Les troubles de la santé mentale en tant que facteurs de risque d'obésité et de diabète de type 2
Duquenne, P. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/89ee3955z2f31z4eb4zbc97zbd12086e7a55
Ye, M., Wu, H., Shan, F., et al. (2026) · The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.1080/13625187.2026.2653971
“Dietary data were categorised using the NOVa system, which classifies foods based on processing level and intent [12].”
Bonnet, C., & Goulão, C. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119425
Ultra-processed food and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review
Rahman, M. A., Hussain, T., Afroz, M., Rahman, S., Mridha, M. K., Shamim, A. A., & Akter, F. (2026) · BMJ Public Health · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2025-003197 · Cited by 1
Correia, P. E., Teixeira, P. P., Martins, B. A. E. T., Porepp, O. D. S. C., Kunzler, L. B., da Natividade, G. R., Ferrari, G. T., Spiazzi, B. F., Colpani, V., & Gerchman, F. (2026) · Clinical Nutrition ESPEN · doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2026.103411
Mendoza, K., Marrero, A., Taméz, M., Espinosa, A., Sotres‐Alvarez, D., McClain, A. C., Cordero, C., Elfassy, T., Perreira, K. M., Mossavar‐Rahmani, Y., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwag139 · Cited by 1
Miller, A., Kotowska, A., & Lachowicz, S. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18122025
“The convenience/ultra-processed pattern reflected higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, fast food, highly processed products, and lard, corresponding broadly to ultra-processed food consumption, which has been linked to higher cardiometabolic and chronic disease risk [41–43].”
Yaghi, J., Al-Awwad, N. J., & Tayyem, R. (2026) · Obesities · doi:10.3390/obesities6040045
Rao, R. V., Subramaniam, K. G., Gregory, J., Bredesen, A. L., Coward, C., Okada, S., Kelly, L., & Bredesen, D. E. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18132206
Louie, J. C. Y. (2026) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.70061 · Cited by 1
Kulkarni, H. R., Arya, R., Mummidi, S., Fowler, S. P., Resendez, R. G., López-Alvarenga, J. C., Díaz-Badillo, Á., Schneider, J., Puppala, S., Farook, V. S., et al. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18142361
Generational Influence on Diet Quality: An Analysis Based on Vigitel 2023
de Oliveira, J. P. L., Fróis, L. F., de Sousa, B. A., et al. (2026) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.70320
Davarpanah, M., Bahadoran, Z., Javadi, M., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2026) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2026.07.010
Machado, P. P., Tolstova, N. Y., Lane, M. M., Costa, C. D. S., Steele, E. M., Rauber, F., Levy, R. B., McNaughton, S. A., Lawrence, M. A., Monteiro, C. A., et al. (2026) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2026.156434
Self-citationBergmann, C., Kallah-Dagadu, G., van der Linden, E. L., Meeks, K. A. C., Klipstein‐Grobusch, K., Nicolaou, M., Henneman, P., Bahendeka, S., Beune, E., Agyemang, C. O., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2026.101471
“This might explain the lack of observed associations with cardiometabolic conditions [70, 71], and analyzing food groups instead of individual foods can further obscure nutritional differences.”
Ultra-processed food intake and male reproductive function: a mini-review
Huang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2026.1852283
The association between ultra-processed foods consumption and cardiometabolic health: a review study
Tahergorabi, R., Sherafatinia, A. M., Nikshoar, I., Tahergorabi, Z., & Farhadi, A. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medical Research · doi:10.66224/jbums.33.5
Schneider, V. M., Silva, L. D. L., Carvalho, G., Lemes, G., Pereira, D. M., & Ferrari, R. (2026) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/s41371-026-01217-7
Nanoparticules dans l’alimentation et désordres métaboliques : quoi de neuf ?
Lamas, B., Evariste, L., & Houdeau, É. (2026) · Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques · doi:10.1016/j.mmm.2026.09.003
Louie, J. C. Y. (2026) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-026-00765-w
“Prospective cohorts on several continents report dose–response relationships with weight gain and adiposity [3, 33, 34], and with incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [35, 36].”
Modern diyetin sessiz salgını: Ultra işlenmiş gıdalar
Kahveci, P. B., & Şahin, B. B. (2026) · Sağlık akademisyenleri dergisi/Sağlık akademisyenler dergisi · doi:10.52880/sagakaderg.1966765
Chen, T., Ni, P., Li, M., Ma, H., Jin, D., Yu, Y., & Yu, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2026.1916253
Metadata
- Authors
- Srour, B., Fezeu, L. K., Kesse-Guyot, E., Allès, B., Debras, C., Druesne-Pecollo, N., Chazelas, E., Deschasaux, M., Hercberg, S., Galan, P., Monteiro, C. A., Julia, C., & Touvier, M.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Paris 13 University, Inserm, Inra, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center–University of Paris (CRESS), 93017 Bobigny, France
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Srour, Bernard
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-02-01
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283
- ISSN
- 2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6990737
- OpenAlex
- W2995681102
- Semantic Scholar
- c2346ec140c10417145d08b337da652a351745b0
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 34
- FWCI
- 49.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- ultra-processed foods, type 2 diabetes, NOVA classification, diabetes risk, NutriNet-Santé cohort, diet quality, weight change, metabolic comorbidities, cancer
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Food Handling, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review