The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Self-guided App-Based Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Acrophobia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Globally, access to evidence-based psychological treatment is limited. Innovative self-help methods using smartphone applications and low-cost virtual reality have the potential to significantly improve the accessibility and scalability of psychological treatments. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of ZeroPhobia, a fully self-guided app-based virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy (VR CBT) using low-cost (cardboard) virtual reality goggles compared with a wait-list control group and to determine its user friendliness. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a single-blind randomized clinical trial, participants were enrolled between March 24 and September 28, 2017, and randomly assigned (1:1) by an independent researcher to either VR CBT app or a wait-list control group. A total of 193 individuals aged 18 to 65 years from the Dutch general population with acrophobia symptoms and access to an Android smartphone participated. The 6 animated modules of the VR-CBT app and gamified virtual reality environments were delivered over a 3-week period in participants' natural environment. Assessments were completed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. Analysis began April 6, 2018, and was intention to treat. Intervention: Self-guided app-based VR CBT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the Acrophobia Questionnaire. The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection. Results: In total, 193 participants (129 women [66.84%]; mean [SD] age, 41.33 [13.64] years) were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 96) or a wait-list control group (n = 97). An intent-to-treat analysis showed a significant reduction of acrophobia symptoms at posttest at 3 months for the VR-CBT app compared with the controls (b = -26.73 [95% CI, -32.12 to -21.34]; P < .001; d = 1.14 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.44]). The number needed to treat was 1.7. Sensitivity and robustness analysis confirmed these findings. Pretreatment attrition was 22 of 96 (23%) because of smartphone incompatibility. Of the 74 participants who started using the VR-CBT app, 57 (77%) completed the intervention fully. Conclusions and Relevance: A low-cost fully self-guided app-based virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy with rudimentary virtual reality goggles can produce large acrophobia symptom reductions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to show that virtual reality acrophobia treatment can be done at home without the intervention of a therapist. Trial Registration: Trialregister.nl identifier: NTR6442.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The use of consumer VRET to treat these phobias has been shown to be effective for acrophobia and claustrophobia, as well as demonstrating efficacy with the general treatment of specific and complex phobias [38].”
From SAFEvR MentalVeRse.app: Development of a Free Immersive Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Acrophobia and Claustrophobia (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the possibility to use VR technologies has been explored in order to give traditional CBT a more ecological and patient-friendly approach, while keeping the whole benefits and effectiveness of the therapy (Donker et al., 2019).”
From Virtual reality and psychedelics for the treatment of psychiatric disease: A systematic literature review (2020) · cites this paper as Donker et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Interestingly enough, all three automated VR exposure applications mentioned above opted to include a virtual therapist of some sort (Donker et al. 2019;Freeman et al. 2018;Miloff et al. 2019), either voiceover or as an embodied agent.”
From Better, Virtually: the Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavior Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as Donker et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“All three trials report impressive symptom reductions”
From Better, Virtually: the Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavior Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as Donker et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“Three high-quality randomized trials have been published recently, featuring three different applications: two on acrophobia with comparison against waiting-list (Donker et al. 2019;Freeman et al. 2018) and one on spider phobia examining non-inferiority against gold-standard in vivo exposure (Miloff et al. 2019).”
From Better, Virtually: the Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavior Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as Donker et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“The advent of modern consumer VR has resolved most of the logistic barriers to running larger clinical trials (but see below), as reflected in the larger sample sizes found in recent studies (Donker et al. 2019;Freeman et al. 2018;Miloff et al. 2019).”
From Better, Virtually: the Past, Present, and Future of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavior Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as Donker et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“To date, three automated VRET treatments have been tested in clinical trials: two for use with acrophobia [26,27] and one for use with spider phobia [28].”
In the citing paper
“none reported on any user experiences beyond providing quotes from four participants on treatment effects [17], system usability ratings and cybersickness scores [18], and common negative effects [19]”
From Experiences of gamified and automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia: qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Although all three studies reported large effect sizes in terms of symptom reduction”
From Experiences of gamified and automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia: qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“To our knowledge, only three randomized clinical trials of automated VRET interventions have been published to date: two for fear of heights [17,18] and one for spider phobia [19]”
From Experiences of gamified and automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia: qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, all three studies on automated VRET [17-19] have included a virtual therapist in some format.”
From Experiences of gamified and automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia: qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“These qualitative findings thus complement previous quantitative research revealing the high efficacy of automated VRET [17-19] in showing that these interventions are also perceived as appealing.”
From Experiences of gamified and automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia: qualitative study (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136319 · Cited by 7,791
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 6,764
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 · Cited by 5,457
An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310802205776 · Cited by 5,181
Kessler, R. C., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Wittchen, H. (2012) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.1359 · Cited by 2,947
The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343603 · Cited by 2,303
Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality
Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00074 · Cited by 1,993
A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments
LaViola, J. J. (2000) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/333329.333344 · Cited by 1,426
Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects
Lee, D. S. (2009) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00536.x · Cited by 1,416
Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders
Andersson, G., & Titov, N. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20083 · Cited by 1,160
Parsons, T. D., & Rizzo, A. A. (2008) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.07.007 · Cited by 994
Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research
Pedersen, A. B., Mikkelsen, E. M., Cronin-Fenton, D. P., Kristensen, N. R., Pham, T. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Petersen, I. (2017) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s129785 · Cited by 982
Carl, E., Stein, A. T., Levihn-Coon, A., Pogue, J. R., Rothbaum, B., Emmelkamp, P., Asmundson, G. J. G., Carlbring, P., & Powers, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003 · Cited by 889
Self-citationRandom allocation software for parallel group randomized trials
Saghaei, M. (2004) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-26 · Cited by 793
The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
(2001) · PubMed Central · Cited by 780
Karyotaki, E., Riper, H., Twisk, J., Hoogendoorn, A., Kleiboer, A., Mira, A., Mackinnon, A., Meyer, B., Botella, C., Littlewood, E., et al. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044 · Cited by 691
Self-citationVirtual reality exposure therapy in anxiety disorders: a quantitative meta-analysis
Opriş, D., Pintea, S., García-Palacios, A., Botella, C., Szamosközi, Ş., & David, D. (2012) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20910 · Cited by 636
A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index
Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(86)80060-0 · Cited by 536
Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: A meta-analysis
Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Horowitz, J. D., Powers, M. B., & Telch, M. J. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007 · Cited by 530
Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Krijn, M., Hulsbosch, A. M., de Vries, S., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. P. G. (2002) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00023-7 · Cited by 475
(2020) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep · Cited by 468
The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination
Fairburn, C. G., & Patel, V. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012 · Cited by 448
Morina, N., Ijntema, H., Meyerbröker, K., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2015) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.010 · Cited by 439
de Graaf, R., ten Have, M., van Gool, C., & van Dorsselaer, S. (2012) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0334-8 · Cited by 390
Freeman, D., Haselton, P., Freeman, J., Spanlang, B., Kishore, S., Albery, E., Denne, M., Brown, P., Slater, M., & Nickless, A. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30226-8 · Cited by 377
STINSON, F. S., DAWSON, D. A., PATRICIA CHOU, S., SMITH, S., GOLDSTEIN, R. B., JUNE RUAN, W., & GRANT, B. F. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707000086 · Cited by 320
Treatment of acrophobia in virtual reality: The role of immersion and presence
Krijn, M., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Biemond, R., de Wilde de Ligny, C., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. P. G. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00139-6 · Cited by 320
Fodor, L. A., Coteț, C. D., Cuijpers, P., Szamoskozi, Ș., David, D., & Cristea, I. A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28113-6 · Cited by 284
Self-citationHow much psychotherapy is needed to treat depression? A metaregression analysis
Cuijpers, P., Huibers, M., Daniel Ebert, D., Koole, S. L., & Andersson, G. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.030 · Cited by 258
Self-citationBuntrock, C., Ebert, D. D., Lehr, D., Smit, F., Riper, H., Berking, M., & Cuijpers, P. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.4326 · Cited by 232
Self-citationThe Practice of Exposure Therapy: Relevance of Cognitive-Behavioral Theory and Extinction Theory
Abramowitz, J. S. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.03.003 · Cited by 218
Comparison of self-report and overt-behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia
Cohen, D. C. (1977) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(77)80116-0 · Cited by 216
Lindner, P., Miloff, A., Hamilton, W., Reuterskiöld, L., Andersson, G., Powers, M. B., & Carlbring, P. (2017) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2017.1280843 · Cited by 187
Self-citationHow to obtain nnt from cohen’s D: comparison of two methods
Furukawa, T. A., & Leucht, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019070 · Cited by 179
A Brief Web-Based Screening Questionnaire for Common Mental Disorders: Development and Validation
Donker, T., Straten, A. V., Marks, I., & Cuijpers, P. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1134 · Cited by 166
Self-citationDonker, T., Bennett, K., Bennett, A., Mackinnon, A., van Straten, A., Cuijpers, P., Christensen, H., & Griffiths, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2307 · Cited by 154
Self-citationPretreatment attrition and dropout in an outpatient clinic for anxiety disorders
Issakidis, C., & Andrews, G. (2004) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00264.x · Cited by 149
Depla, M. F. I. A., ten Have, M. L., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & de Graaf, R. (2007) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-007-0291-z · Cited by 139
A meta-analytic examination of attrition in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders
Benbow, A. A., & Anderson, P. L. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.006 · Cited by 136
Rozental, A., Castonguay, L., Dimidjian, S., Lambert, M., Shafran, R., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2018) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2018.42 · Cited by 124
Self-citationAbelson, J. L., & Curtis, G. C. (1989) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(89)90091-0 · Cited by 97
Deterioration rates in Virtual Reality Therapy: An individual patient data level meta-analysis
Fernández-Álvarez, J., Rozental, A., Carlbring, P., Colombo, D., Riva, G., Anderson, P. L., Baños, R. M., Benbow, A. A., Bouchard, S., Bretón-López, J. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.005 · Cited by 79
Self-citationCognitive processing and acrophobia: validating the Heights Interpretation Questionnaire
Steinman, S. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.05.001 · Cited by 69
Specific phobia predicts psychopathology in young women
Trumpf, J., Margraf, J., Vriends, N., Meyer, A. H., & Becker, E. S. (2009) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0159-5 · Cited by 50
Specific phobia and comorbid depression: a closer look at the National Comorbidity Survey data
Choy, Y., Fyer, A. J., & Goodwin, R. D. (2007) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.10.010 · Cited by 48
0Phobia – towards a virtual cure for acrophobia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Donker, T., van Esveld, S., Fischer, N., & van Straten, A. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2704-6 · Cited by 36
Self-citationA systematic review and meta‐analysis of treatments for acrophobia
Arroll, B., Wallace, H. B., Mount, V., Humm, S. P., & Kingsford, D. W. (2017) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja16.00540 · Cited by 35
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- CohenDC. Personality predictors and the outcome of varieties of desensitization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; 1972.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?
Rowland, S. P., Fitzgerald, J. E., Holme, T., Powell, J., & McGregor, A. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x · Cited by 454
Virtual reality therapy in mental health
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Meyerbröker, K. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115923 · Cited by 363
Virtual reality in the diagnostic and therapy for mental disorders: A systematic review
Wiebe, A., Kannen, K., Selaskowski, B., Mehren, A., Thöne, A.-K., Pramme, L., Blumenthal, N., Li, M., Asché, L., Jonas, S., et al. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102213 · Cited by 223
He, Y., Yang, L., Qian, C., Li, T., Su, Z., Zhang, Q., & Hou, X. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/43862 · Cited by 213
Advances in immersive virtual reality interventions for mental disorders: A new reality?
Geraets, C. N. W., van der Stouwe, E. C. D., Pot-Kolder, R., & Veling, W. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.02.004 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Donker, T., Cornelisz, I., van Klaveren, C., van Straten, A., Carlbring, P., Cuijpers, P., & van Gelder, J.-L.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Department of Education Sciences, Section Methods and Statistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Department of Psychology of Conflict, Risk and Safety, University of Twente, Enschede, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Donker, Tara
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 682
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6583672
- OpenAlex
- W2923961203
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- acrophobia, self-guided treatment, mobile application, low-cost virtual reality, gamification, anxiety disorders, treatment accessibility, attrition, ease of use, waitlist control, treatment effect size, number needed to treat, sensitivity analysis, robustness analysis
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Virtual Reality, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review