Cited by 475Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia

Emmelkamp, P.M.G, Krijn, M, Hulsbosch, A.M, de Vries, S, Schuemie, M.J, van der Mast, C.A.P.G·2002·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-budget virtual reality (VR) exposure versus exposure in vivo in a between-group design in 33 patients suffering from acrophobia. The virtual environments used in treatment were exactly copied from the real environments used in the exposure in vivo program. VR exposure was found to be as effective as exposure in vivo on anxiety and avoidance as measured with the Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ), the Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire (ATHQ) and the Behavioral Avoidance Test (BAT). Results were maintained up to six months follow-up. The present study shows that VR exposure can be effective with relatively cheap hardware and software on stand-alone computers currently on the market. Further studies into the effectiveness of VR exposure are recommended in other clinical groups as agoraphobics and social phobics and studies in which VR exposure is compared with more emerging virtual worlds as presented in CAVE-type systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00023-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Krijn, M., Hulsbosch, A. M., de Vries, S., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Emmelkamp, P.M.G
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
509-516
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021999691
Cited by
475
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
23.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, acrophobia, fear of heights, exposure therapy, low-cost virtual reality, anxiety, avoidance behavior, treatment effectiveness, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Random Allocation, User-Computer Interface, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review