Cited by 614Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

Rothstein, Hannah R., Sutton, Alexander J., Borenstein, Michael·2005·Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Publication Bias As a Threat to Validity Organization of the Book Our Modest Proposal References

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0470870168.ch1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M.
Affiliations
  • Baruch College (US)
  • Long Island Jewish Medical Center (US)
Venue
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-07
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W2146302105
Cited by
603
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
publication bias, meta-analysis validity, research bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review