The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 66 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Child sexual abuse is a significant global problem in both magnitude and sequelae. The most widely used primary prevention strategy has been the provision of school-based education programmes. Although programmes have been taught in schools since the 1980s, their effectiveness requires ongoing scrutiny. OBJECTIVES: To systematically assess evidence of the effectiveness of school-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Specifically, to assess whether: programmes are effective in improving students' protective behaviours and knowledge about sexual abuse prevention; behaviours and skills are retained over time; and participation results in disclosures of sexual abuse, produces harms, or both. SEARCH METHODS: In September 2014, we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and 11 other databases. We also searched two trials registers and screened the reference lists of previous reviews for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs, and quasi-RCTs of school-based education interventions for the prevention of child sexual abuse compared with another intervention or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We summarised data for six outcomes: protective behaviours; knowledge of sexual abuse or sexual abuse prevention concepts; retention of protective behaviours over time; retention of knowledge over time; harm; and disclosures of sexual abuse. MAIN RESULTS: This is an update of a Cochrane Review that included 15 trials (up to August 2006). We identified 10 additional trials for the period to September 2014. We excluded one trial from the original review. Therefore, this update includes a total of 24 trials (5802 participants). We conducted several meta-analyses. More than half of the trials in each meta-analysis contained unit of analysis errors.1. Meta-analysis of two trials (n = 102) evaluating protective behaviours favoured intervention (odds ratio (OR) 5.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98 to 16.51), with borderline low to moderate heterogeneity (Chi² = 1.37, df = 1, P value = 0.24, I² = 27%, Tau² = 0.16). The results did not change when we made adjustments using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to correct errors made in studies where data were analysed without accounting for the clustering of students in classes or schools.2. Meta-analysis of 18 trials (n = 4657) evaluating questionnaire-based knowledge favoured intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.78), but there was substantial heterogeneity (Chi² = 104.76, df = 17, P value < 0.00001, I² = 84%, Tau² = 0.10). The results did not change when adjusted for clustering (ICC: 0.1 SMD 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.81; ICC: 0.2 SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77).3. Meta-analysis of 11 trials (n =1688) evaluating vignette-based knowledge favoured intervention (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.65), but there was substantial heterogeneity (Chi² = 34.25, df = 10, P value < 0.0002, I² = 71%, Tau² = 0.08). The results did not change when adjusted for clustering (ICC: 0.1 SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.74; ICC: 0.2 SMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89).4. We included four trials in the meta-analysis for retention of knowledge over time. The effect of intervention seemed to persist beyond the immediate assessment (SMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.17; I² = 84%, Tau² = 0.13, P value = 0.0003; n = 956) to six months (SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87; I² = 25%; Tau² = 0.01, P value = 0.26; n = 929). The results did not change when adjustments were made using ICCs.5. We included three studies in the meta-analysis for adverse effects (harm) manifesting as child anxiety or fear. The results showed no increase or decrease in anxiety or fear in intervention participants (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.07; n = 795) and there was no heterogeneity (I² = 0%, P value = 0.79; n=795). The results did not change when adjustments were made using ICCs.6. We included three studies (n = 1788) in the meta-analysis for disclosure of previous or current sexual abuse. The results favoured intervention (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.13 to 11.24), with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%, P value = 0.84). However, adjusting for the effect of clustering had the effect of widening the confidence intervals around the OR (ICC: 0.1 OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 12.33; ICC: 0.2 OR 2.95, 95% CI 0.69 to 12.61).Insufficient information was provided in the included studies to conduct planned subgroup analyses and there were insufficient studies to conduct meaningful analyses.The quality of evidence for all outcomes included in the meta-analyses was moderate owing to unclear risk of selection bias across most studies, high or unclear risk of detection bias across over half of included studies, and high or unclear risk of attrition bias across most studies. The results should be interpreted cautiously. AUTHOR
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
4 of 66 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“These effect sizes ranged from 0.57 (Heidotting 1994, 18 studies), through 0.71 (Rispens 1997, 16 studies) and 0.90 (Berrick 1992, 13 studies) to 1.07 (Davis 2000, 27 studies).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Agreements and disagreements with other studies or reviews
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Heidotting 1994
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rispens 1997 source
- Supportedcites Berrick 1992 source
In “Overview of Effect Sizes and Knowledge,” the paper reports a mean knowledge effect size of d = 0.90 across 13 studies. That matches the 0.90 attributed to Berrick (1992); the other values in the citing sentence are attributed to other reviews. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No studies measured parental anxiety or fear.”
- Also stated in: § Data synthesis · plain
“No studies measured parental anxiety or fear.”
- Also stated in: § Harm -parental or child anxiety or fear · plain
“No studies measured parental anxiety or fear.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Data synthesis · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“OR 5.71 (1.98 to 16.51) 102 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕ moderate 1”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Quality of the evidence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Knowledge gains (measured via questionnaires) were not significantly eroded one to six months after the intervention for either intervention or control groups.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Key results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean knowledge score in the intervention groups was 0.61 standard deviations higher (0.45 higher to 0. 78 higher)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results favoured intervention
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vignette-based knowledge (applied knowledge measured by assessing responses to hypothetical scenarios, immediately post intervention) (higher score = higher knowledge)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results favoured intervention
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Questionnairebased knowledge (factual knowledge measured by assessing responses to items on a questionnaire or multi-choice test, immediately post intervention) (higher score = higher knowledge)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results favoured intervention
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of harm, there was no evidence that programmes increased or decreased children's anxiety or fear.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Key results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean knowledge score in the intervention groups was 0.45 standard deviations higher (0.24 higher to 0. 65 higher)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results favoured intervention
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“behaviours (self protective events measured using a stranger simulation test immediately post in- tervention) 390 per 1000 795 per 1000 (559 to 914) OR 5.71 (1.98 to 16.51) 102 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕ moderate 1”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Quality of the evidence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 255
- It may state two separate claims as one. 140
- The quote only partly states this claim. 22
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“These consequences are far-reaching into families and communities, with significant costs for institutions in terms of primary and rehabilitative health care, education and welfare assistance, child protection, and justice system costs (Fang 2012).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Fang 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods sections estimate health care, special education, child welfare, and criminal justice costs associated with child maltreatment. But the Discussion says the paper did not estimate costs by type of maltreatment, so those costs cannot all be attributed specifically to child sexual abuse. The copy addresses child welfare services, not welfare assistance as a separate cost category; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A recent meta-analysis found child sexual abuse was also associated with higher rates of physical health conditions, including gastrointestinal, gynaecological, and cardiovascular problems, and obesity (Irish 2010).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Irish 2010 source
The Discussion states that the meta-analysis found higher rates of gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and cardiopulmonary symptoms and obesity among people with a history of childhood sexual abuse. It notes that gastrointestinal symptoms and obesity were exceptions when assessed using continuous measures; the corresponding dichotomous outcomes showed significant differences. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We excluded one of the previously included studies from this update (Pacifici 2001), because we reassessed it as not meeting the eligibility criterion for type of intervention, being focused on sexual violence prevention in the context of dating relationships for adolescents (see Fellmeth 2013), rather than explicitly on knowledge of child sexual abuse and its prevention.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Fellmeth 2013 source
The review’s study description (Acknowledgements; page not specified) describes an intervention for 10th-grade students using a video of a virtual date and measuring knowledge and attitudes toward dating violence. Its References identify Pacifici 2001 as a prevention program for teenagers on sexual coercion. Fellmeth 2013 supports the characterization of the study; the decision to exclude it from the citing review is the citing authors’ own reassessment. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In some cases, authors did not respond.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Dealing with missing data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ICCs were not reported in the studies, nor were they available from study authors.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Unit of analysis issues
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching methods used in delivery included rehearsal, practice, role-play, discussion, and feedback.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Study characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The duration of interventions ranged from a single 45-minute session to eight 20-minute sessions on consecutive days.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Study characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there were many common elements, including the teaching of safety rules, body ownership, private parts of the body, distinguishing types of touches and types of secrets, and who to tell.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Study characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Programme delivery formats included film, video or DVD, theatrical plays, and multimedia presentations.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Study characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified several types of missing data in this review update: missing outcomes, missing summary data, and missing participants.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Dealing with missing data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some authors responded helpfully to these requests, but data could only be provided for the most recent studies; in other cases, data had been collected over two decades ago and were no longer available.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Dealing with missing data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean knowledge score measured using a variety of instruments across control groups ranged from 1 to 42”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results favoured intervention
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded 55 studies because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Excluded studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Six studies measured child anxiety or fear via child report (Blumberg 1991;Daigneault 2012;Dawson 1987;Hazzard 1991;Kraizer 1991;Lee 1998), and four studies via parent report (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Hazzard 1991;Hébert 2001;Tutty 1997).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm -parental or child anxiety or fear
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The previous review was based on 15 included studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vignette-based knowledge measures were used in 11 studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge -vignette-based measures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded 14 studies because the intervention was not primarily about child sexual abuse prevention, but was about dating and relationship violence, gendered violence, or sexual harassment in the context of partner relationships”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Excluded studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the studies enrolled participants on the basis of previously reported abuse.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Retention of self protective skills was measured in three studies at one month (Poche 1988), and six months (Fryer 1987a;Kraizer 1991).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of protective behaviours over time
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genderspecific proportions were not reported in five studies”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All programmes were delivered on school premises and during school hours, apart from one study in which the programme was delivered in the morning, before school classes began (Chen 2012).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Interventions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded four studies because they were not school-based and one study because participants were outside the age criteria.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Excluded studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Questionnaire-based knowledge measures were used in 21 studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge -questionnaire-based measures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All studies were conducted in school settings: 23 in primary (elementary) schools and one in a special school for adolescents with intellectual disabilities.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Settings
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of the quasi-RCTs, all but Del Campo Sanchez 2006 used a Solomon four-group design (Campbell 1963;Solomon 1949).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Campbell 1963
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Solomon 1949 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For this update, we searched the period from August 2006 to September 2014”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ten studies used both vignette-and questionnaire-based measures”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only one study did not measure knowledge (Poche 1988), and one study used a vignette-based measure only (Krahé 2009).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Study participants' mean ages at baseline in the included studies ranged from 5.8 years (Harvey 1988) to 13.44 years (Lee 1998).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Three studies allocated participants to one of four groups, three of which were intervention groups comprising programme variations (Hazzard 1991;Poche 1988;Wurtele 1986).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 3Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After duplicates were removed, we screened 10,218 records and excluded 10,161 records.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proportion of females in the included studies ranged from 45% (Poche 1988; e en-Ero ul 2013) to 55% (Crowley 1989).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded 36 studies on the basis of study type (13 pretest and post-test studies without control groups; 11 controlled before-and-after studies without random assignment; five posttest only studies; five quasi-experimental studies without random assignment; one cross-sectional comparative study; and one comparative group design).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Excluded studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We retrieved and evaluated the full-text reports of the remaining 57 records for eligibility.Of these, we excluded 43 reports”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The total number of participants randomised in cluster-RCTs ranged from 74 (Poche 1988) to 1269 (Oldfield 1996).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Sample sizes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified a total of 12,969 records through database searching and a further 58 records from other sources.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 24 included studies, seven were randomised controlled trials (RCTs)”
- Also stated in: § Design · plain
“11 were cluster-RCTs”
- Also stated in: § Design · plain
“and six were quasi-RCTs”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Design · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified: 10 new included studies, one of which was translated from Spanish into English (Del Campo Sanchez 2006); three additional reports of two included studies from the previous review (Blumberg 1991;Fryer 1987b); and one ongoing study (NCT02181647).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Results of the search
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The use of more than one measure by studies to assess knowledge gain was not anticipated at the outset of this systematic review.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 10 trials the unit of randomisation was individual school students.Of these, seven were RCTs (as above) and three were quasi-RCTs (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Saslawsky 1986;Snyder 1986).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 10Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One study reported knowledge outcomes at five months (Blumberg 1991), three studies at six months (Fryer 1987a;Kolko 1989;Kraizer 1991), and two studies at eight months (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Krahé 2009).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of knowledge over time
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four studies allocated participants to one of three groups, two of which were intervention groups comprising slight variations of the same programme (Krahé 2009;Kraizer 1991), or different programmes (Blumberg 1991;Del Campo Sanchez 2006).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 4Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Authors of eight studies did not report the mean age of participants at baseline”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Questionnaire-based measures were administered as self completed measures via individual or group administration.Vignette measures were administered by interview.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The duration of the intervention programmes in the included trials ranged from a single 45-minute session (Oldfield 1996) to eight 20-minute sessions on consecutive days (Fryer 1987a).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Interventions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourteen interventions were brief (i.e. less than 90 minutes total duration)”
- Also stated in: § Interventions · plain
“and the remainder were longer, lasting from 90 to 180 minutes in total duration.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Interventions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Interventions · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three studies used a second questionnairebased measure to establish construct validity (Chen 2012;Crowley 1989;Del Campo Sanchez 2006).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The unit of randomisation in 14 studies was clusters (classrooms, schools, or districts).Of these, 11 were cluster-RCTs (as above) and three were quasi-RCTs (Crowley 1989;Daigneault 2012;Hébert 2001).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eleven studies (including nine cluster-RCTs and two studies in which participants were randomised as individuals) each included more than 200 participants.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Sample sizes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 2Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One trial enrolled female participants only (Lee 1998).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, our subjective impression of the fixed-effect funnel plots suggested the presence of slight asymmetry on the lower right (here we found smaller studies with greater effect sizes) indicating the possibility that some studies are missing from the lower left (here we should have found smaller studies with smaller effect sizes)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Other potential sources of bias
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When adjusted, an ICC of 0.1 produced a SMD of 0.66 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.81; Analysis 2.2) and an ICC of 0.2 produced a SMD of 0.63 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.77; Analysis 2.3).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When we excluded studies at high risk of bias (Blumberg 1991;Daigneault 2012;Grendel 1991;Kolko 1989), the SMD increased to 0.57 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.89), indicating that children from studies with better follow-up tended to score somewhat higher in this domain.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In one study (Kraizer 1991), children in the intervention group participated in an exit interview (n = 332): 14.8% of the children experienced some anxiety or fear initially but none on programme completion, and 4.5% experienced some anxiety or fear initially and remained a little worried on programme completion.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 332Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Follow-up assessment of factual knowledge was limited to four studies with our meta-analyses showing that factual knowledge scores did not deteriorate for either intervention or control groups one to six months after interventions.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The knowledge scales used in the included studies validly measure children's knowledge relevant to child sexual abuse prevention.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SMD was 0.42 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.77) for the younger group and 0.89 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.19) for the older group.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When studies at high risk of bias were excluded (Blumberg 1991;Crowley 1989;Daigneault 2012;Dake 2003;Grendel 1991;Kolko 1989), the SMD was 0.69 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.88), indicating that children from studies with better follow-up tended to score somewhat higher in this domain.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, in intervention group children, Tutty 1997 (n = 231) found worry about scary things happening (1.7%), but no bedwetting, nightmares, crying, rejection of normal affection, or attention seeking behaviour.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Complete data were not available for any of these studies and a meta-analysis could not be conducted.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of protective behaviours over time
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the test for subgroup differences was not significant (Chi² = 0.14, df = 1; P value = 0.71), suggesting knowledge scores did not deteriorate significantly for intervention or control groups within the one-to six-month follow-up period.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of knowledge over time
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This updated review reported on 24 trials (29 reports) examining the effectiveness of school-based programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse.The studies report on data for 5802 child participants of whom 5730 (almost 98.8%) were from primary (elementary) schools.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > D I S C U S S I O N Summary of main results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 5,802Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For an ICC of 0.1, the SMD was 0.53, (95% CI 0.32 to 0.74; Analysis 2.5) and for an ICC of 0.2, the SMD was 0.60 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.89; Analysis 2.6).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across all of the included studies, less than half of the studies (10 of 24) reported on short-term knowledge outcomes (within three months of the intervention), three studies reported medium-term outcomes (up to 12 months post-intervention), and only one study measured retention of knowledge beyond 12 months.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the analysis, heterogeneity approached the moderate range (I² = 27%; Tau² = 0.16) and was non-significant (P value = 0.24).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Protective behaviours
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 24 included studies, 21 reported questionnaire-based knowledge using a range of different measures detailed above.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three of the 21 studies did not provide data in a way that could be included in meta-analysis (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Harvey 1988;Kraizer 1991).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1688 participants.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three studies were conducted with children in lower primary school (kindergarten to grade three).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Protective behaviours
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SMD was 0.39 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.69) for the younger group and 0.56 (95% CI 0.03 to 1.08) for the older group.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Del Campo Sanchez 2006 (n = 193) reported the following in children exposed to the intervention: fear of adults (1%) and increased fighting with peers (1%), but no sleep problems, or rejection of normal affection.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 193Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SMD was 0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.78), reflecting an average 0.61 standard deviation (SD) increase in factual knowledge, across various measures, for the intervention group.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Both ratios”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Disclosure
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chadwick 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When we excluded three studies (Chen 2012;Hazzard 1991;Hébert 2001), the SMD was reduced to 0.36 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.56), indicating a slight testing effect.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Hébert 2001 (n = 133) reported intervention group children having increased dependency behaviours (13%), more aggressiveness towards peers (15%) and siblings (29%), and more fearfulness of strangers (25%).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight of 526 participants (1.5%) reported ongoing sexual abuse and 20 (3.8%) reported past sexual abuse.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Disclosure
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 526Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SMD was 0.45 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.65) (see Analysis 2.4), indicating that those receiving treatment had an average 0.45 SD increase in applied knowledge as reflected in their responses to vignettes administered post-intervention, a gain of moderate effect size.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Questionnaire-based measures were used in 21 of the 24 included studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of knowledge over time
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising a total of 4657 participants.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ten of these studies reported on retention of knowledge over time.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of knowledge over time
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Twelve studies used vignette-based measures in various formats, including verbal, picture, and video vignettes.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Vignette-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Narrative synthesis of included studies revealed that a small proportion of programme participants experienced anxiety or fear but these (anxieties or fears) were mild rather than severe, and shortrather than long-term.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The anxiety or fear scales used in the included studies validly measure harm from programme participation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we noted that approximately half of the programmes in included studies used content, such as the teaching of safety rules (e.g.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of effective programmes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the 24 studies included in this review, 15 discrete questionnaire-based measures and six discrete vignettebased measures were used to measure children's factual and applied knowledge respectively.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“mean age was not reported in eight of 24 included studies and in others was conflated with grade level.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Subgroup effects
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No study in this area has yet published a study protocol, and we found no clinical trials register records pertaining to studies of this type.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Overall completeness and applicability of evidence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most (16 of 24) were conducted in North America, the remainder in Europe, East Asia, and Central Asia.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Overall completeness and applicability of evidence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meta-analysis of three studies found no evidence of increased or decreased anxiety or fear in those exposed to programmes and this did not change when adjusted for clustering.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Harm
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The anxiety or fear scales used in the included studies validly measure harm from programme participation.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It appears that older children make greater knowledge gains than younger children when tested using questionnaire-based measures, but not when using vignette-based measures, indicating the need for caution when interpreting study findings.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > A U T H O R S ' C O N C L U S I O N S Implications for practice
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Std.Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.50, 0.77]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“3.2 Questionnaire-based knowledge (follow-up) 4 Std.Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.32, 1.11]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“3.1 Questionnaire-based knowledge (post-test) 4 Std.Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.53, 1.20]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 1042 746 100.0 % 2.95 [ 0.69, 12.61 ] Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.0; Chi 2 = 0.05, df = 2 (P = 0.98); I 2 =0.0%Test for overall effect: Z = 1.46 (P = 0.14)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kolko 1989 191 30 1.9865 (4.6663) 2.5 % 7.29 [ 0.00, 68342.01]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kolko 1989 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 1042 746 100.0 % 3.04 [ 0.75, 12.33 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Del Campo Sanchez 2006 193 105 1.0347 (0.7843) 89.4 % 2.81 [ 0.61, 13.09 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.63 [ 0.50, 0.77 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.86 [ 0.53, 1.20 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 1095 593 100.0 % 0.45 [ 0.24, 0.65 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Oldfield 1996 658 611 1.3166 (2.6049) 8.1 % 3.73 [ 0.02, 615.30]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Oldfield 1996 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 611 318 100.0 % 0.69 [ 0.51, 0.87 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 1042 746 100.0 % 3.56 [ 1.13, 11.24 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % -0.03 [ -0.46, 0.40 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.73 [ 0.41, 1.06 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.60 [ 0.31, 0.89 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.53 [ 0.32, 0.74 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 456 339 100.0 % -0.08 [ -0.22, 0.07 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % -0.04 [ -0.42, 0.33 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 2594 2063 100.0 % 0.61 [ 0.45, 0.78 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Disclosures: spontaneous child disclosures reported (8/277 or 2.9% in experimental groups; 2/105 or 1.9% in control group)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 277Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.86 [ 0.53, 1.20 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 633 323 100.0 % 0.78 [ 0.38, 1.17 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.66 [ 0.51, 0.81 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subtotal (95% CI) 100.0 % 0.72 [ 0.32, 1.11 ]”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“The time of greatest vulnerability for child sexual abuse is between 7 and 12 years of age (Finkelhor 1986).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Finkelhor 1986 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Child sexual abuse is associated with adverse psychosocial outcomes such as depression (Roosa 1999), post-traumatic stress disorder (Widom 1999), antisocial and suicidal behaviours (Bensley 1999), eating disorders (Perkins 1999), alcohol and substance abuse (Spak 1998), post-partum depression and parenting difficulties (Buist 1998), sexual re-victimisation, and sexual dysfunction (Fleming 1999).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent meta-analyses of data collected from retrospective studies of adults in countries and cultures worldwide estimate that 10% to 20% of female children, and 5% to 10% of male children, have experienced child sexual abuse on a spectrum from exposure through unwanted touching to penetrative assault before the age of 18 years (Barth 2013;Ji 2013;Pereda 2009;Stoltenborgh 2011).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In cases where agreement could not be reached during screening, we asked a third and fourth review author to independently assess the study against the inclusion criteria, and we resolved these cases via discussion and consensus.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Selection of studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“KW repeated assessment of risk of bias after a six-month interval.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data were entered into RevMan by KZ (Review Manager 4.2 in 2007) and KW (Review Manager 5.2 in 2013), and independently checked for accuracy by a research assistant who was not involved in the review.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data extraction and management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For continuous outcomes this was to be reported as the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Measures of treatment effect
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We drew fixed-effect forest plots with studies plotted according to weight (i.e. from most to least precise).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of reporting biases
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two review authors (KZ and SW in 2007) independently performed data extraction.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data extraction and management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the review update, the procedure was repeated by one review author (KW) who independently assessed risk of bias for all included studies and compared these results to those obtained in the original review”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data collection and analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We assessed heterogeneity (study diversity) visually and by examining the I² statistic (Higgins 2002), a quantity which describes the proportion of variation in point estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of heterogeneity
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Higgins 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If data remained unavailable after these processes, we excluded these studies from the analyses.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Dealing with missing data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These data are likely to underestimate its true prevalence because two-thirds of individuals never disclose their victimisation (London 2005) and most cases go unreported to authorities (Wyatt 1999).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“School-based programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse were rapidly and widely adopted across the USA, assisted in some states by policy mandates, and by the mid 1990s it was estimated that two-thirds of 10-to 16-year olds in the USA had participated in such programmes (Finkelhor 1995c).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Description of the intervention
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Finkelhor 1995c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We weighted these using the generic inverse variance function and used random-effect models.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Unit of analysis issues
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Risk factors for child sexual abuse, mainly identified in Western countries, include being female (Fergusson 1996), having a physical or mental disability (Westcott 1999), living without a natural parent (Finkelhor 1986;Finkelhor 1990), parental mental illness, parental alcohol or drug dependency, and young maternal age (Fergusson 1996;Holmes 1998;MacMillan 2013).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used verbatim text from study reports as support for each judgement of risk wherever possible.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two review authors (KZ and SW in 2007;KZ and KW in 2013;KW and AS in 2014) independently screened the titles, abstracts, and methodology sections of papers appearing to meet inclusion criteria.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Selection of studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, some children report increased worry following programme participation (Finkelhor 1995c) and older children have been found to experience more negative feelings about non-sexual physical touch (Taal 1997).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Why it is important to do this review
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Finkelhor 1995c
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Taal 1997 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the original review, two review authors (KZ, SW) independently assessed each included study.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Review authors assessing risk of bias were not blinded to the names of the authors, institutions, journals, or results of studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“To assess reporting biases, we used two approaches to investigate the relationship between effect size and sample size (Borenstein 2009).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of reporting biases
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Borenstein 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these cases, we combined all relevant intervention groups into a single group, and all relevant control groups into a single group.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Unit of analysis issues
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However these studies harbour the limitations of retrospective recall and have not been replicated with larger and more diverse samples.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > How the intervention might work
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We made judgements by answering 'yes' (assessed as low risk of bias), 'no' (assessed as high risk of bias) or 'uncertain' (assessed as unclear risk of bias) to pre-specified questions for each domain.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with KZ assessing risk of bias independently for new studies in 2013”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is not possible to know for sure that all authors received our correspondence.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data extraction and management
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We assessed risk of bias using the seven domains on the Cochrane revised 'Risk of bias' assessment tool (Higgins 2011, Table 8.5a)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Higgins 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no discrepancies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of risk of bias in included studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence on programmes' effectiveness with regard to the fifth and arguably the most important measure, the degree to which programmes actually reduce the incidence of child sexual abuse, remains a pressing and unanswered empirical question that requires ongoing review.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Why it is important to do this review
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Child sexual abuse is a problem of considerable magnitude with short-and long-term repercussions for those victimised.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > B A C K G R O U N D Description of the condition
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“KW repeated data extraction for all 24 studies in 2013, with KZ extracting data independently for new studies in 2013.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data extraction and management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study of 2000 10-to 16-year olds found that those exposed to more comprehensive prevention education were more knowledgeable about sexual abuse, more likely to report using self protection strategies, more likely to report protective efficacy, more likely to have disclosed their victimisation, and less likely to engage in self blame (Finkelhor 1995a).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > How the intervention might work
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Finkelhor 1995a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We supplemented this with a statistical test of homogeneity to determine the strength of evidence for genuine heterogeneity using a significance level of P value > 0.05.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of heterogeneity
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Schools are a logical choice for teaching children about sexual abuse and its prevention, given their primary function is to educate (Wurtele 2009), and the content of prevention programmes aligns with proscribed school health curricula (Walsh 2013).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Description of the intervention
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the original review, and in this review update, we reported the summary of effect for dichotomous outcomes as an OR with 95% CI.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Measures of treatment effect
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We synthesised the data using tools provided in Review Manger (RevMan) 5.2 (RevMan 2012).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data synthesis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites RevMan 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We classified two studies as high risk of bias: one study reported important differences between groups at baseline and concluded failure of randomisation (Crowley 1989, pp 60-1) and another study revealed school officials were involved in the process (Kraizer 1991, p 27).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Allocation concealment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conducted a series of sensitivity analyses removing from the analyses studies with high risk of bias for: (i) allocation concealment (selection bias); (ii) blinding of outcome assessors (detection bias); (iii) incomplete outcome data (attrition of over 20%), and (iv) selective reporting (reporting bias).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Sensitivity analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In all cases, we corrected for small sample size bias by using Hedges' g, which is the default in Review Manager (RevMan) 5.2 (RevMan 2012).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data synthesis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites RevMan 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Poche 1988, there was substantial loss to follow-up.”
- Also stated in: § Retention of protective behaviours over time · plain
“Poche 1988 reported significant loss to follow-up with only nine of 23 children available for measurement.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Retention of protective behaviours over time
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Retention of protective behaviours over time · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven further studies provided no information on blinding procedures and we classified them as unclear risk of bias”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of participants and personnel
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each outcome of interest the evidence started at high quality and could be downgraded to moderate, low or very low quality after consideration of the possible impact of risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness and publication bias on our confidence in the effects of intervention.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Rating the quality of the evidence
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We rated the quality of the evidence for our main outcomes according to methods for rating evidence from randomised controlled trial developed by the GRADE working group”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Rating the quality of the evidence
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites GRADE working group
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One study reported a random component in the sequence generation, coin tossing (Snyder 1986), and we classified it as low risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Risk of bias in included studies Allocation Random sequence generation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in three studies outcome assessors were reported to be different to the personnel delivering the interventions”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In two studies, video monitoring was used to collect observational data on the protective behaviours outcome, and coders' inter-rater reliability was reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also drew fixed-effect funnel plots and checked them for asymmetry indicating the presence of publication bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of reporting biases
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In both approaches, trends or asymmetry could be due to publication or related biases (e.g.language bias, availability bias, citation bias) or due to genuine differences between small and large trials (Borenstein 2009;Egger 1997).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Assessment of reporting biases
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The different methods of administration and the type of response required from the child means that these two outcomes may measure different aspects of children's knowledge; therefore, we considered them as separate knowledge outcomes.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these studies outcome assessment was administered in group format (in class or with a number of children) and there were no strategies in place to blind outcome assessors to group membership or to ensure children completed the assessment independently”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding was not reported in seven studies (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Harvey 1988;Kolko 1989;Lee 1998;Tutty 1997;Wolfe 1986; e en-Ero ul 2013), which we classified as unclear risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In one study, evidence of computerised randomisation was provided after author contact (Dake 2003).We re-classified this study as low risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Risk of bias in included studies Allocation Random sequence generation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ten studies provided no baseline comparisons and we also classified them as unclear risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Allocation concealment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also conducted sensitivity analyses to determine the impact of unit of analysis errors, arising from inadequate adjustment for cluster-randomisation in published results.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Sensitivity analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Twelve studies did not report attrition rates (Daigneault 2012;Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Hazzard 1991;Hébert 2001;Krahé 2009;Oldfield 1996;Poche 1988;Saslawsky 1986;Tutty 1997;Wolfe 1986;Wurtele 1986;e en-Ero ul 2013).We classified these studies as unclear risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Incomplete outcome data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One study reported that participants were assessed only once (either pre-test or post-test) by the same outcome assessor to control for potential effects of rapport building (Blumberg 1991).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these 10 studies, Fryer 1987a implemented more strategies than any other study and we considered it to be at lowest risk of bias in this domain.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On further consideration of the differences between the included studies in terms of their setting and intervention, we decided instead to adopt a random effects model to combine data.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data synthesis
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conducted sensitivity analysis to explore the extent to which results were influenced by risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Sensitivity analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We assessed the appropriateness of combining studies based on sufficient comparability with respect to: the type of intervention, the type of outcome measures, and the nominated data collection points pre-and post-intervention.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data synthesis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We calculated summary statistics (OR for dichotomous data and SMD for continuous data) with 95% CIs for each study.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Data synthesis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the subsequent meta-analysis, studies with unadjusted unit of analysis errors would be incorrectly and more highly weighted than is, in reality, appropriate.This risks biasing results in favour of the intervention.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Other potential sources of bias
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven studies reported attrition rates of more than 10%, ranging from 12% to 24%, all of which we classified as high risk of bias”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Incomplete outcome data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 18 studies included in this meta-analysis, 12 were clusterrandomised studies and all were analysed with unit of analysis errors.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, we assumed unit of analysis errors in all cases, meaning the original P values would be artificially small.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Other potential sources of bias
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary we considered five studies as high risk of bias on this domain (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Fryer 1987a;Harvey 1988;Kraizer 1991;Wolfe 1986), and we considered the remaining 19 studies low risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Selective reporting
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results indicate that knowledge scores in these studies may be influenced by assessor bias or contamination from group assessment, or both, such that better controlled studies may generate lower effect sizes in this domain.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the generalisation of responses from simulated to actual settings cannot be assumed.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Protective behaviours
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results suggest that children exposed to the interventions tend to display increased factual knowledge about sexual abuse and its prevention, when measured immediately after completion of the programme, and the effect is of a moderate size”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Questionnaire-based knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies reported complete outcome data that matched the stated aims or hypothesis of the study, and reported on pre-specified outcomes of interest.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Selective reporting
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A methodological problem in these studies was data completeness because, at the time of follow-up, control groups had already been exposed to the programmes and it is unethical to withhold programme delivery.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One study reported no attrition or loss to follow-up (Chen 2012) and we classified it as low risk of bias.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Incomplete outcome data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children's responses were recorded by independent assessors using contemporaneous video monitoring (Fryer 1987a;Kraizer 1991), or by the research assistant (Poche 1988).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Protective behaviours
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: 24%”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the thesis were also reported in the results.Significant and insignificant results were reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, such disclosures cannot really be considered an adverse event since: (i) the onset of the alleged abuse would have occurred prior to the intervention; (ii) disclosing abuse, while potentially traumatic, can also prompt the provision of treatment; and (iii) the identification and reporting of perpetrators may prevent harm to other children.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Disclosures
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The onset of the alleged abuse reported in disclosure studies occurred before the intervention.
- Rests on an assumption: Disclosing abuse can prompt the provision of treatment.
- Rests on an assumption: Identifying and reporting perpetrators may prevent harm to other children.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results.The results reported in the papers refer only to the simulation”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data on 74 participants (20%) were excluded due to missing or incomplete data, or absence during a portion of the study”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 74Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Classroom teachers, a guidance counsellor, and the researcher served as outcome assessors.Outcome assessors remained in the classroom during the child sexual abuse prevention presentation, therefore, it was not possible for them be blinded to the groups they were assessing.It is not clear if outcome assessment was administered individually to children, or in group format with whole classes”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children were blinded to the simulation test.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article are reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding procedures were not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition is noted as 7.3% intervention, 2. 6% control 1, 3.1% control 2 Incomplete data were noted as due to student absence or withdrawal from school.It is possible that there were differences between students with complete and incomplete data”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results.Additional interaction effects were presented”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Missing data were reported for 1/24 in experimental group (4%) and 3/24 for the control group (12.5%).Data were gathered only from children present on both testing days”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 24Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further research is also required to address uncertainties about the magnitude of skill or knowledge improvement (or both) that can (if at all) translate to clinically important protective effects.Such ev-idence is a necessary precursor to assessing programmes' cost-effectiveness.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Implications for research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding procedures were not reported.It did not seem that the intervention groups were blinded to their own condition.Homeroom teachers were present during programme delivery, so it was not possible for them to be blinded to the students' conditions”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Group administration of the outcome assessment meant that outcome assessors would need to be blinded to the condition of whole schools.This may not have been possible under the circumstances.The identities of the outcome assessors were not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: intervention group, 7/96 (7.3%); control group 1, 2/76 (2.6%); control group 2, 2/65 (3.1%)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“successful randomisation of Groups 1 & 2 did not occur”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“There were differences in pre-test mean scores for groups 1 and 2. Group 1 had higher scores on the pre-test SAKI than group 2. Group 3 had higher scores on the SAKI and PSQ than group 4”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schools were randomly assigned to conditions across two years of the study”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Twenty-four each were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups tested”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment of clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interviewers (n = 7) and ESPACE instructors (n = 4) were blind to school status at T1 and T2.Only interviewers were blind to school status at T4 and T5”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Classes in the selected schools were randomly assigned to the different treatment groups”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In using SMDs, we treated the different assessment measures as though they were one standardised measure with comparable standard deviations (SDs).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Knowledge
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding procedures were not reported.Students within one school were receiving both treatment and control conditions.Authors indicate that children may have been exposed to”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.Tests for baseline imbalances were conducted.No statistical differences were evident between intervention and control groups on outcome measures for knowledge or efficacy expectations”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results.However, data were incomplete (i.e. missing means and standard deviations on total knowledge scores for each of the 3 conditions)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Where data were reported, participants were from a diverse range of ethnicities, increasing the generalisability of the evidence, and also suggesting that concern about child sexual abuse prevention and the delivery of programmes in schools is a wide-spread phenomenon.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Overall completeness and applicability of evidence
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the appropriate analysis for cluster-randomisation was not used in any of the studies resulting in potential for overestimation of the effects of interventions.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Quality of the evidence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Method of randomisation was not reported.Evidence of computer randomisation provided after author contact (Zwi 2007)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zwi 2007 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.Tests of baseline imbalances revealed”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: < 10%”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interviewers (n = 7) and ESPACE instructors (n = 4) were blind to school status at T1 and T2.Only interviewers were blind to school status at T4 and T5”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ICCs used in the meta-analysis are imputed and may not be appropriate for all of the studies included.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Quality of the evidence
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no, although in some analyses ANCOVA was used to enable adjustment for confounding because of the influence of intact groups”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, there was detection bias due to inadequate or unclear assessor, participant and personnel blinding, and inadequate or unclear reporting of attrition for assessments at post-test and follow-up.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Quality of the evidence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reliable evidence of this type will advance assessment of programmes' cultural sensitivity, and the appropriateness of programmes for groups of children considered at greater risk.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Implications for research
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Missing data were not reported.Attrition was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Research to date suggests several categories of factors that may influence programme effectiveness, such as child factors, including family microsystem factors; programme factors, including school contextual factors; and evaluation design factors (Heidotting 1994;Rispens 1997).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Implications for research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Heidotting 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rispens 1997 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.Tests of baseline imbalances were conducted.Age, race, and gender ratios were not significantly different among groups.However, results showed that the mean pre-test knowledge test score for group B (control 1) was significantly higher than A (intervention) or C (control 2) on the pre-test (p 82)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Research assistants conducted the outcome assessments.They were blind to each child's group assignment (p 240).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“No differences between the conditions were found in relation to different interviewers”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: intervention group, 12/62 (19%); control group, 14/63 (22%)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All teachers were aware that different schools were receiving different services and were told that we were evaluating the effectiveness of different models of sexual abuse prevention training”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measures discussed in the methods section of the article are reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In each school one intact class was randomly assigned to the treatment group, a second intact class was randomly assigned Grendel 1991 (Continued) to the control group, and the students in the third class were randomly assigned to ether the treatment or control group”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the paper were also discussed in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk PSQ was administered in group format to children in classes.WIST was individually administered to children in an interview format.Interviewers”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding procedures were not reported.It is not known whether whole schools were allocated to conditions or whether schools comprised classes allocated to both treatment and control conditions.The latter presents a higher risk of treatment-control contamination”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Methods of blinding were not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children in each of the four schools were randomly assigned (with the restriction that at the pre intervention assessment Harvey 1988 (Continued) there was approximately an equal number of black and white boys and girls per group) to one of two groups: an experimental group and a placebo control group”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“All data were collected in a blind assessment format”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“To control for intergroup contamination, we assigned participants from the same school to the same program”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not reported.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outcome assessment was conducted”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Missing data were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding procedures were not reported.2”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the paper were also discussed in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Missing data were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“Scoring was completed by an observer via contemporaneous video monitoring”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk The method of assessment (group or individual administration) was not reported.The measures used to blind outcome assessors from knowledge of which intervention participants received was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“Measures used to blind outcome assessors were not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section were reported in the results section”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adjustment for clustering: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding procedures were not reported.Students within 1 school were receiving treatment and control conditions therefore there was a possibility of treatmentcontrol contamination.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measures discussed in the methods section were also reported in the results section”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data, mainly in the form of”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“Attrition was reported as 2/38 (5.3%) for the intervention group and 3/34 (8.8%) for the control group”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.In terms of baseline imbalances, results indicated no significant differences in the age of children, family socioeconomic status, gender, or race between experimental and control groups”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Blinding procedures were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition not was reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Missing data were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Blinding procedures were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Blinding procedures were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Missing data were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Blinding procedures were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.Tests of baseline imbalances were conducted:”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“Not all measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Blinding procedures were not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One school from each set was randomly assigned to one of four conditions”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of randomisation was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intervention groups were not blinded to their own condition and school personnel were not blinded to group or class conditions since teachers attended training and completed measures.Since both intervention and control groups were from the same school, there is a possibility of treatmentcontrol contamination effects”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition was reported only for the study overall, and not specified for intervention and control groups.Attrition and missing data were attributed to student absence during the programme or testing, and moving from the school.Attrition was calculated overall as 19/90 (21%)”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results.Means and SDs for knowledge outcomes were measured but not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Blinding procedures were not reported.Children may not have been blinded to their condition.Blinding of key personnel (e.g.teachers) may not have been possible in the school delivery context.The programme and testing were conducted on the same day in an attempt to control for contamination effects”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Method of assessment (group or individual administration) was not specified.The measures used to blind outcome assessors from knowledge of group membership was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section were reported in the results section”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outcome assessment was conducted individually with each participant.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: 21%”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding procedures were not reported.Students within 1 school were receiving treatment and control conditions therefore there was a possibility of treatmentcontrol contamination.It was not possible for school personnel (e.g.teachers) to be blinded to the study condition of their classes”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · hedged
“Teachers, as key personnel, could not have been blinded to group allocation”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · hedged
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the paper were also discussed in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Missing data were noted for 8/177 participants (4.5%) owing to parental omissions on the child data sheet.Attrition from the study is not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 177Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measures discussed in the methods section were also reported in the results section”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attrition: not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Attrition between pre-and post-test was not reported.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Attrition was high”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Blinding procedures were not reported.Students within the same school were receiving the intervention or participating in the wait-listed control group.There is risk of treatment-control contamination effects.It is likely that children were not blinded to their condition.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“The questionnaire was administered collectively in class”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intention-to-treat analysis: no”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
“Attrition for the study overall was reported as 3.8%”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“Method of concealment was not described.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
“All measures discussed in the methods section of the article were also reported in the results section”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID] · plain
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outcome assessments were conducted via group administration by a research assistant who read the scripts to participating children in each class.However, the video measure was administered at post-test and follow-up to a random sample of 4 to 6 children from each group.The video measure was”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 6Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk The method of assessment (group or individual administration) was not reported.The measures used to blind outcome assessors from knowledge of which intervention participants received was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We decided to use a random effects model throughout the review in the expectation that variation between the results of the studies represented a distribution of related intervention effects.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > D I F F E R E N C E S B E T W E E N P R O T O C O L A N D R E V I E W
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding procedures were not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Method of assessment (group or individual administration) was not specified.The measures used to blind outcome assessors from knowledge of group membership was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“There were no baseline imbalances regarding pre-treatment knowledge and skills in groups”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Del Campo Sanchez 2006
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of concealment was not described.Potentially unconcealed procedure”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measures discussed in the methods section of the article are reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Missing data were not reported.Attrition was not reported”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All measures discussed in the methods section of the article are reported in the results”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, ICCs were not reported in the studies or available from study authors.Instead, we used estimates of 0.1 and 0.2 that had been previously used in a review of school-based violence prevention programmes (Mytton 2006).”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > D I F F E R E N C E S B E T W E E N P R O T O C O L A N D R E V I E W
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mytton 2006 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subgroup analyses were only conducted for age, but not for other variables, as there was insufficient information provided in the included studies.”
§ School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse > D I F F E R E N C E S B E T W E E N P R O T O C O L A N D R E V I E W
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
School-based education programmes are the most widely used primary prevention strategy for child sexual abuse.
“The most widely used primary prevention strategy has been the provision of school-based education programmes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcome measures used in included studies (simulation tests, questionnaires, and vignettes) validly measure protective behaviours and knowledge.
“protective behaviours (as measured by an independently scored simulation test); 2. knowledge of sexual abuse or knowledge of sexual abuse prevention concepts, or both (as measured by questionnaires or vignettes)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The results of the included studies can be pooled in meta-analyses despite heterogeneity.
“The quality of the evidence for all outcomes included in the meta-analyses (combining of data) was moderate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The search strategy identified all relevant studies.
“In September 2014, we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and 11 other databases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The onset of the alleged abuse reported in disclosure studies occurred before the intervention.
“the onset of the alleged abuse would have occurred prior to the intervention”
The paper relies on this without support.
Disclosing abuse can prompt the provision of treatment.
“disclosing abuse, while potentially traumatic, can also prompt the provision of treatment”
The paper relies on this without support.
Identifying and reporting perpetrators may prevent harm to other children.
“the identification and reporting of perpetrators may prevent harm to other children”
The paper relies on this without support.
The knowledge scales used in the included studies validly measure children's knowledge relevant to child sexual abuse prevention.
“All studies used unique knowledge scales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The anxiety or fear scales used in the included studies validly measure harm from programme participation.
“In these studies, harm was measured via child self report anxiety or fear scales, with all studies using unique measures”
The paper relies on this without support.
Schools currently use a range of interventions to prevent child sexual abuse.
“Currently, schools implement a variety of interventions aimed at preventing child sexual abuse.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Child sexual abuse is under-identified and hard to prove.
“However, even large cohort studies may not provide definitive evidence for changes in child sexual abuse incidence, as it is under-identified and difficult to prove.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most programmes offer multiple participatory opportunities, often in combination.
“Given that most programmes include multiple participatory opportunities, often in combination, it may be more informative to develop and explore the effects of multidimensional programme typologies as noted above.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“some children may experience fear, anxiety and confusion about touches after a prevention program”
From Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Opportunities: Parenting, Programs, and the Reduction of Risk (2018) · cites this paper as Walsh et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, evidence that this education reduces CSA risk is limited and mixed.”
From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Walsh et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A trial without vignette data appears in the vignette analysis
MajorThe vignette-based knowledge meta-analysis includes Kolko 1989, although its included-study entry explicitly says it had no vignette-based knowledge outcome.
“Kolko 1989 213 1.7 (0.9) 35 1.4 (0.9)”
“Knowledge (vignette-based knowledge): no Disclosure: data collected from school guidance counsellor incident reports”
A fourth-grade trial is assigned to the younger-only subgroup
MajorThe questionnaire-based age analysis places Daigneault 2012 among studies with only kindergarten-to-third-grade participants. Its study entry includes fourth-grade students, so it does not meet that subgroup definition.
“six studies with only younger participants from kindergarten to grade three (Blumberg 1991;Daigneault 2012;Dake 2003;Grendel 1991;Hébert 2001;Kolko 1989)”
“Participants Participants: 160 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th grade students”
The protocol-differences count disagrees with its numbered list
MinorThe section announces five main differences, but its list continues through a sixth, labelled subgroup analyses.
“There are five main differences between the protocol, Zwi 2003, and the review update.”
“6. Subgroup analyses.On p 4 of the review protocol, we specified the conduct of”
Grendel's randomised total is smaller than its group denominators
MinorThe Grendel entry states that 100 students were randomised, but its attrition figures use initial intervention and control denominators of 62 and 63. Those denominators total 125.
Reported 100 · recomputed 125
“Participants Total number randomised: 100 1st grade students”
The abstract places participants in secondary schools despite the results
MinorThe abstract describes participants as attending primary and secondary schools, while the settings section says no included study took place in a secondary school.
“5802 participants in primary (elementary) and secondary (high) schools”
“None of the included studies were conducted in secondary (high) school settings.”
Allocation-group categories total 25 rather than 24 studies
MinorThe design section assigns 18 studies to two groups, four to three groups, and three to four groups. These mutually exclusive counts total 25, exceeding the review's 24 included studies.
Reported 24 · recomputed 25
“Four studies allocated participants to one of three groups, two of which were intervention groups comprising slight variations of the same programme (Krahé 2009;Kraizer 1991), or different programmes (Blumberg 1991;Del Campo Sanchez 2006).Three studies allocated participants to one of four groups”
A registered ongoing trial contradicts the claim of no trial-register records
MinorThe discussion says no clinical-trials-register records were found for this type of study. Elsewhere the review identifies an ongoing registered trial of a school-based sexual-abuse prevention programme.
“we found no clinical trials register records pertaining to studies of this type.”
“Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID] NCT02181647 Trial name or title Safe touches: a rigorous evaluation of a sexual abuse prevention program for children Methods Randomised controlled trial”
Oldfield is omitted from the count of child-anxiety studies
MinorThe outcomes section says six studies measured child anxiety or fear by child report, but Oldfield 1996 also used child self-report anxiety measures and is not among the six named studies.
“Six studies measured child anxiety or fear via child report (Blumberg 1991;Daigneault 2012;Dawson 1987;Hazzard 1991;Kraizer 1991;Lee 1998)”
“Other: Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) (Reynolds 1985), a 37item self report anxiety measure for children in grades 1 to 3; The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC) (Spielberger 1973) a 20-item self report measure for children in grades 4 to 6”
Snyder's allocation unit is both individuals and classes
MinorThe design summary counts Snyder 1986 among individually randomised trials, but its study entry identifies classes as the unit of allocation. The distinction matters to the review's clustering adjustments.
“In 10 trials the unit of randomisation was individual school students.Of these, seven were RCTs (as above) and three were quasi-RCTs (Del Campo Sanchez 2006;Saslawsky 1986;Snyder 1986).”
“Snyder 1986 Methods Design: quasi-experimental Solomon 4-group design Unit of allocation: classes”
Cluster-RCT count changes within the study description
MinorThe design section classifies 11 of the 24 studies as cluster-RCTs, whereas the sample-size section refers to 13 cluster-RCTs.
“11 were cluster-RCTs (Blumberg 1991;Dake 2003;Dawson 1987;Grendel 1991;Hazzard 1991;Kolko 1989;Krahé 2009;Kraizer 1991;Oldfield 1996;Poche 1988;Wolfe 1986)”
“The number of participants in the 13 cluster-RCTs ranged from 74 (Poche 1988) to 1269 (Oldfield 1996)”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c332 · Cited by 9,329
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Flagged first, then by citations
12 of the 210 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Blumberg, 1987, The Effects of Two Sexual Abuse Prevention Training Programs on the Evaluation of Touches [MA Psych thesis]
- Chadwick, 1989, A Comparative Evaluation of Two Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs for Children [PhD thesis]
- Dawson, 1987, An Evaluation of Cognitive and Affective Outcomes of a Prevention Program for Childhood Sexual Abuse [EdD thesis]
- Grendel, 1991, Cognitive and Emotional Effects of a Brief Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for First Graders [EdD thesis]
- Kraizer, 1991, The Safe Child Program for the Prevention of Child Abuse: Development and Evaluation of a School-Based Curriculum [PhD thesis]
- Snyder, 1986, An Evaluation of the "Good Secrets, Bad Secrets" Assault Prevention Program [PhD thesis]
- Alexander, 1998, The Assessment of a School-Based Intervention for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse [EdD thesis]
- Bodzy, 1988, The Effects of a Personal Safety Program on Affective Measures of Child Development [EdD thesis]
- Deretzotes, 1989, Evaluation of High School Level CAPTA Child Abuse Prevention Programs [PhD thesis]
- Herman, 1987, Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Curriculum/Prevention Program [PhD thesis]
- Johnson, 1994, The Effectiveness and Emotional Consequences of a School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program [MSCP thesis]
- Kindt, 1995, Evaluation of an Adolescent Sexual Abuse Prevention Program [PhD Thesis]
- Michaelson, 2001, Development, Evaluation and Revision of the School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program (CSAPP Project) [PhD Thesis]
- Pohl, 1990, Reactions of children, parents, and teachers to child sexual abuse prevention programs, Education, 110, 337
- Taylor, 1991, An Evaluative Study of the Child Abuse Research and Education Program [Med Thesis]
- Tutty, 1991, An Investigation of the Ability of Elementary School-Aged Children to Learn Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Concepts [PhD thesis]
- Webb, 1997, An Evaluation of a School Based Sexual Abuse Prevention Program [MHealSc thesis]
- Bandura, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
- Battle, 1981, Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventories for Children and Adults
- Binder, 1987, Evaluation of a school-based sexual abuse prevention program: cognitive and emotional effects, Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 497, 10.1016/0145-2134(87)90075-5 · DOI
- Blumberg, 1987, The Effects of Two Sexual Abuse Prevention Training Programs on the Evaluation of Touches [MA Psych thesis]
- Chadwick, 1989, A Comparative Evaluation of Two Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs for Children [PhD thesis]
- Church, 1988, The prevention of sexual abuse: examination of the effectiveness of a program with kindergarten-age children, Behaviour Therapy, 19, 429, 10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80014-5 · DOI
- Cooper, 1991, New Strategies for Free Children: Child Abuse Prevention for Elementary School Children
- Finkelhor, 1992, Sexual abuse prevention education: a review of evaluation studies, 150
- Flandreau-West, 1984, Protective Behaviors: Anti-Victim Training for Children, Adolescents and Adults
- Fryer Jr, 1987, Measuring children's retention of skills to resist stranger abduction: use of the simulation technique, Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 181, 10.1016/0145-2134(87)90056-1 · DOI
- Girard, 1985, Who is a Stranger and What Should I Do?
- Grimm, 1994, Red Flag/Green Flag People II: A Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Older Elementary Age Children
- Kraizer, 1981, Children Need to Know Personal Training Program
- Kraizer, 1989, Child sexual abuse prevention programs: what makes them effective in protecting children?, Children Today, 18, 23
- Macdonald, 2001, Effective Interventions for Child Abuse and Neglect
- Mental Health Association of Westchester County, 1984, Good Touches/Bad Touches: A Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program Part II, for Fourth Through Sixth Grades, Revised Edition
- Orpinas, 1995, Students for Peace Project: Second Student Evaluation
- Rape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead, 2008, Red Flag/Green Flag People: A Personal Safety Program for Early Elementary Age Children
- Raven, 1960, Guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2012
- Sanderson, 2004, Child-focused sexual abuse prevention programs: how effective are they in preventing child abuse?, Crime and Misconduct Commission Research and Issues Paper Series, 5, 1
- Speilberger, 1966, Anxiety and Behavior
- Tutty, 2000, What children learn from sexual abuse prevention programs: difficult concepts and developmental issues, Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 275, 10.1177/104973150001000301 · DOI
- Williams, 1980, Red Flag/Green Flag People Coloring Book
- Wurtele, 1986, Teaching Young Children Personal Body Safety: The Behavioral Skills Training Program
- Wurtele, 2007, Body Safety Training Workbook
- Wurtele, 2010, Primary prevention of child sexual abuse: child- and parent-focused approaches, 107
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interventions to prevent child maltreatment and associated impairment
MacMillan, H. L., Wathen, C. N., Barlow, J., Fergusson, D. M., Leventhal, J. M., & Taussig, H. N. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61708-0 · Cited by 654
Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews
Mikton, C., & Butchart, A. (2009) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.08.057075 · Cited by 511
Lalor, K., & McElvaney, R. (2010) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838010378299 · Cited by 376
Child Sexual Abuse: Toward a Conceptual Model and Definition
Mathews, B., & Collin‐Vézina, D. (2017) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838017738726 · Cited by 396
Guedes, A. C., Bott, S., García‐Moreno, C., & Colombini, M. (2016) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v9.31516 · Cited by 423
McElvaney, R. (2013) · Child Abuse Review · doi:10.1002/car.2280 · Cited by 340
European report on preventing child maltreatment.
Sethi, D., Bellis, M. D. D., Hughes, K. N., Gilbert, R. E., Mitis, F., & Galea, G. (2013) · Cited by 314
Lessons learned from child sexual abuse research: prevalence, outcomes, and preventive strategies
Collin‐Vézina, D., Daigneault, I., & Hébert, M. (2013) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1753-2000-7-22 · Cited by 292
Pound, P., Langford, R. M., & Campbell, R. M. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011329 · Cited by 280
Wright, L., Cotter, D., Hickson, M., & Frost, G. (2005) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.2005.00605.x · Cited by 273
Akmatov, M. K. (2010) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyq168 · Cited by 272
Walsh, K., Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., & Shlonsky, A. (2018) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731515619705 · Cited by 239
Self-citationMason-Jones, A., Sinclair, D., Mathews, C., Kagee, A., Hillman, A., & Lombard, C. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006417.pub3 · Cited by 184
Comprehensive Sexuality Education as a Primary Prevention Strategy for Sexual Violence Perpetration
Schneider, M., & Hirsch, J. S. (2018) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838018772855 · Cited by 229
McHardy, S. F., Wang, H.-Y. L., McCowen, S. V., & Valdez, M. C. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · doi:10.1080/13543776.2017.1272571 · Cited by 167
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Opportunities: Parenting, Programs, and the Reduction of Risk
Rudolph, J., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Shanley, D. C., & Hawkins, R. (2018) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559517729479 · Cited by 154
Adolescent Health Interventions: Conclusions, Evidence Gaps, and Research Priorities
Salam, R. A., Das, J. K., Lassi, Z. S., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.006 · Cited by 154
Fellmeth, G. L., Heffernan, C., Nurse, J., Habibula, S., & Sethi, D. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004534.pub3 · Cited by 154
Youth Internet Safety Education: Aligning Programs With the Evidence Base
Finkelhor, D., Walsh, K., Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Collier, A. (2020) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838020916257 · Cited by 177
Self-citationEuropean Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on prevention of mental disorders
Campion, J., Bhui, K. S., & Bhugra, D. (2012) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.10.004 · Cited by 138
Pound, P., Denford, S., Shucksmith, J., Tanton, C., Johnson, A. M., Owen, J., Hutten, R., Mohan, L., Bonell, C., Abraham, C., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014791 · Cited by 127
Practitioner Review: School‐based interventions in child mental health
Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., & Popow, C. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12584 · Cited by 134
Letourneau, E. J., Schaeffer, C. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Feder, K. A. (2017) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559517692439 · Cited by 112
Recipients of children’s and adolescents’ disclosures of childhood sexual abuse: A systematic review
Manay, N., & Collin-Vézina, D. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104192 · Cited by 100
Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., Pacella, R., Scott, J. G., Higgins, D. J., Meinck, F., Erskine, H. E., Thomas, H. J., Lawrence, D., Malacova, E., et al. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106562 · Cited by 85
Pulido, M. L., Dauber, S. E., Tully, B. A., Hamilton, P., Smith, M. J., & Freeman, K. D. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302594 · Cited by 82
How Much Child Sexual Abuse is “Below the Surface,” and Can We Help Adults Identify it Early?
Martin, E. K., & Silverstone, P. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00058 · Cited by 92
Witt, K., Milner, A. J., Spittal, M. J., Hetrick, S. E., Robinson, J., Pirkis, J., & Carter, G. L. (2018) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1111-6 · Cited by 87
Interventions to Prevent or Reduce Violence Against Women and Girls : A Systematic Review of Reviews
Arango, D. J., Morton, M., Gennari, F., Kiplesund, S., & Ellsberg, M. (2014) · doi:10.1596/21035 · Cited by 77
Landgren, V., Malki, K., Bottai, M., Arver, S., & Rahm, C. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0440 · Cited by 78
Emerging trends in adolescent suicide prevention research
King, C. A., Arango, A., & Foster, C. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.037 · Cited by 85
Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse: Analysis and Discussion of the Field
Zeuthen, K. E., & Hagelskjær, M. (2013) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2013.811136 · Cited by 70
Child Sexual Abuse: The Need for a Perpetration Prevention Focus
Assini‐Meytin, L. C., Fix, R. L., & Letourneau, E. J. (2020) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2019.1703232 · Cited by 71
McKibbin, G., Humphreys, C., & Hamilton, B. E. (2017) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.017 · Cited by 80
Evaluation of a Personal Safety Program with Latino Preschoolers
Kenny, M. C., Wurtele, S. K., & Alonso, L. (2012) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.675426 · Cited by 64
Prevention of Child Maltreatment
Lane, W. G. (2014) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2014.06.002 · Cited by 63
Intimate partner violence in the family: Considerations for children's safety
MacMillan, H. L., Wathen, C. N., & Varcoe, C. (2013) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.05.005 · Cited by 66
Violência sexual na adolescência, perfil da vítima e impactos sobre a saúde mental
Fontes, L. F., Conceição, O. C., & Machado, S. (2017) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-81232017229.11042017 · Cited by 64
Pundir, P., Saran, A., White, H., Subrahmanian, R., & Adona, J. (2020) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1120 · Cited by 62
Evaluation of a school-based sexual abuse prevention curriculum in Malaysia
Weatherley, R. A., Ah, S. H. A. B., Omar, N., John, M., Shah-Preusser, N., & Yong, M. (2011) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.009 · Cited by 58
Child sexual abuse education with ethnically diverse families: A preliminary analysis
Kenny, M. C. (2010) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.025 · Cited by 53
An unfinished agenda on adolescent health: Opportunities for interventions
Lassi, Z. S., Salam, R. A., Das, J. K., Wazny, K., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2015) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.005 · Cited by 61
The Role of Integrated Knowledge Translation in Intervention Research
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0564-9 · Cited by 50
Devries, K. M., Allen, E., Child, J. C., Walakira, E., Parkes, J., Elbourne, D. R., Watts, C. H., & Naker, D. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-232 · Cited by 51
Bacchus, L., Colombini, M., Urbina, M. C., Howarth, E., Gardner, F. E. M., Annan, J. R., Ashburn, K., Madrid, B. J., Levtov, R., & Watts, C. H. (2017) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2016.1274410 · Cited by 50
Public Health Models for Preventing Child Maltreatment
Scott, D. A., Lonne, B., & Higgins, D. J. (2016) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016658877 · Cited by 51
Bustamante, G., Andrade, M. S., Mikesell, C., Cullen, C., Endara, P., Burneo, V., Yépez, P., Saavedra, S. A., Ponce, P., & Grunauer, M. (2019) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.02.009 · Cited by 50
Child sexual abuse disclosures: Does age make a difference?
McElvaney, R., Moore, K., O’Reilly, K., Turner, R. K., Walsh, B., & Guérin, S. (2019) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104121 · Cited by 55
The Teachers’ Role in Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: Implications for Teacher Education.
Scholes, L., Jones, C. M., Stieler‐Hunt, C., Rolfe, B., & Pozzebon, K. (2012) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.5 · Cited by 47
Oswald, T. K., Nguyen, M. T., Mirza, L., Lund, C., Jones, H. G., Crowley, G., Aslanyan, D., Dean, K., Schofield, P., Hotopf, M. H., et al. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291724000333 · Cited by 66
Pilot Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Taiwanese Children
Chen, Y., Fortson, B. L., & Tseng, K.-W. (2012) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.726699 · Cited by 47
Goldschmidt-Gjerløw, B. (2019) · Human Rights Education Review · doi:10.7577/hrer.3079 · Cited by 58
Czerwinski, F., Finne, E., Alfes, J., & Kolip, P. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.023 · Cited by 48
Parents as Teachers: Mothers’ Roles in Sexual Abuse Prevention Education in Gorgan, Iran
Khoori, E., Gholamfarkhani, S., Tatari, M., & Wurtele, S. K. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104695 · Cited by 47
Misperceptions about child sex offenders
Richards, K. (2011) · Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks · doi:10.52922/ti258908 · Cited by 44
Sexual Abuse Prevention Mobile Application (SAP_MobAPP) for Primary School Children in Korea
Moon, K. J., Park, K. M., & Sung, Y. (2017) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2017.1313350 · Cited by 44
Ogunfowokan, A. A., & Fajemilehin, B. R. (2012) · The Journal of School Nursing · doi:10.1177/1059840512446949 · Cited by 43
Community-level moderators of a school-based childhood sexual assault prevention program
Morris, M. C., Kouros, C. D., Janecek, K., Freeman, R., Mielock, A. S., & Garber, J. (2016) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.005 · Cited by 42
Jin, Y., Chen, J., & Yu, B. (2019) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.029 · Cited by 41
Child sexual abuse prevention goes online: Introducing “Cool and Safe” and its effects
Müller, A. R., Röder, M., & Fingerle, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.023 · Cited by 43
Dale, R., Shanley, D. C., Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J., Lines, K., Pickering, K., & White, C. (2015) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.016 · Cited by 39
Differences in child sexual abuse cases involving child versus adolescent complainants
Giroux, M. E., Chong, K., Coburn, P. I., et al. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.011 · Cited by 39
Macintyre, A. K., Torrens, C., Campbell, P., Maxwell, M., Pollock, A., Biggs, H., Woodhouse, A., Williams, J., & McLean, J. (2020) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.008 · Cited by 38
Toward Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Child Welfare
Littell, J. H., & Shlonsky, A. (2009) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731509347886 · Cited by 38
Self-citationMadrid, B. J., Lopez, G. D., Dans, L. F., Fry, D. A., Duka-Pante, F. G. H., & Muyot, A. T. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04080 · Cited by 37
MacGregor, J. C. D., Wathen, C. N., Kothari, A. R., Hundal, P. K., & Naimi, A. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-862 · Cited by 36
McKibbin, G. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.008 · Cited by 37
Fidelity in school-based child sexual abuse prevention programs: A systematic review
Lynas, J., & Hawkins, R. M. F. (2017) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.003 · Cited by 38
Russell, D. H., Trew, S., Harris, L. G., Dickson, J., Walsh, K., Higgins, D. J., & Smith, R. (2024) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241235895 · Cited by 59
Self-citationSchool-based Child Sexual Abuse Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Lu, M., Barlow, J., Meinck, F., Walsh, K., & Wu, Y. (2022) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315221111393 · Cited by 49
Self-citationCelik, P. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100348 · Cited by 54
O’Neil-Pirozzi, T. M., Kennedy, M. R. T., & Sohlberg, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000181 · Cited by 33
Future directions in child sexual abuse prevention: An Australian perspective
McKibbin, G., & Humphreys, C. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104422 · Cited by 34
Sexual Abuse Prevention Concept Knowledge: Low Income Children Are Learning but Still Lagging
Holloway, J. L., & Pulido, M. L. (2018) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1496506 · Cited by 33
Serious games for learning: games-based child sexual abuse prevention in schools
Scholes, L., Jones, C. M., Stieler‐Hunt, C., & Rolfe, B. (2014) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.860195 · Cited by 32
Salt, E. G., Wiggins, A. T., Cooper, G. L., Benner, K., Adkins, B., Hazelbaker, K., & Rayens, M. K. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105132 · Cited by 31
Bright, M. A., Huq, M. S., Patel, S., Miller, M. D., & David Finkelhor, B. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520909185 · Cited by 31
Nickerson, A. B., Tulledge, J., Manges, M. E., Kesselring, S., Parks, T. W., Livingston, J. A., & Dudley, M. J. (2019) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104101 · Cited by 34
Child Welfare Reform: A Scoping Review
McTavish, J. R., McKee, C., Tanaka, M., & MacMillan, H. L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114071 · Cited by 49
Neuropharmacology of attention
Burk, J. A., Blumenthal, S. A., & Maness, E. B. (2018) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.08.008 · Cited by 31
Rudolph, J., Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J., Shanley, D. C., Walsh, K., & Hawkins, R. (2018) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1425946 · Cited by 35
Self-citationShields, M., Tonmyr, L., & Hovdestad, W. (2016) · Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada · doi:10.24095/hpcdp.36.11.03 · Cited by 31
Knowledge and Skills of Sexual Abuse Prevention: A Study on School-Aged Children in Beijing, China
Jin, Y., Chen, J., & Yu, B. (2016) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2016.1199079 · Cited by 36
Yusof, R. C., Norhayati, M. N., & Azman, M. Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.909254 · Cited by 31
Ameli, V., Meinck, F., Munthali, A., Ushie, B. A., & Langhaug, L. F. (2017) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.027 · Cited by 31
Walsh, K., Berthelsen, D., Nicholson, J. M., Brandon, L., Stevens, J., & Rachele, J. N. (2013) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.843446 · Cited by 30
Self-citationInterventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map
Finch, M., Featherston, R., Chakraborty, S., Bjørndal, L. D., Mildon, R. L., Albers, B., Fiennes, C., Taylor, D., Schachtman, R., Yang, T., et al. (2021) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1139 · Cited by 32
Self-citationTeaching privacy: A flawed strategy for children’s online safety
Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105064 · Cited by 36
Keeping Students Out of Harm’s Way: Reducing Risks of Educator Sexual Misconduct
Wurtele, S. K., Mathews, B., & Kenny, M. C. (2018) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1486933 · Cited by 30
School Nurses Avoid Addressing Child Sexual Abuse
Kraft, L. E., Rahm, G., & Eriksson, U.-B. (2017) · Journal of School Nursing · doi:10.1177/1059840516633729 · Cited by 27
Soltan, F., Cristofalo, D., Marshall, D. C., Purgato, M., Taddese, H. B., Vanderbloemen, L., Barbui, C., & Uphoff, E. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013657.pub2 · Cited by 34
Primary School Teachers’ Perspective of Sexual Education in Spain. A Qualitative Study
del Pino, F. J. P., Soliani, I., Fernández‐Sola, C., Molina-García, J. J., Ventura‐Miranda, M. I., Pomares-Callejón, M. Á., López‐Entrambasaguas, O. M., & Fernández, M. D. R. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9030287 · Cited by 29
Teaching General Safety and Body Safety Training Skills to a Latino Preschool Male with Autism
Kenny, M. C., Bennett, K. D., Dougery, J., & Steele, F. (2012) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9671-4 · Cited by 27
Lindenbach, D., Cullen, O., Bhattarai, A., Perry, R., Diaz, R. L., Patten, S. B., & Dimitropoulos, G. (2021) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104898 · Cited by 28
Evaluation of second step child protection videos: A randomized controlled trial
Nickerson, A. B., Livingston, J. A., & Kamper‐DeMarco, K. E. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.001 · Cited by 25
Saran, A., White, H., Albright, K., & Adona, J. (2020) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1116 · Cited by 27
Kenny, M. C., Crocco, C., & Long, H. (2020) · Sexuality and Disability · doi:10.1007/s11195-020-09636-1 · Cited by 26
Webb, N., Moloney, L. J., Smyth, B., & Murphy, R. L. (2021) · Australian Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1002/ajs4.171 · Cited by 24
Blakey, J. M., Glaude, M. W., & Jennings, S. W. (2019) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104092 · Cited by 27
Fulu, E., Kerr-Wilson, A., Gibbs, A., Jacobson, J., Jewkes, R. K., Lang, J., Mazars, C., Schauerhammer, V., & Watts, C. H. (2015) · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, K., Zwi, K., Woolfenden, S., & Shlonsky, A.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Sydney Children's Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-16
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- CD004380-CD004380
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC9805791
- OpenAlex
- W1717762653
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 14
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse prevention, primary prevention, protective behavior, intervention effectiveness, children and adolescents, bystander intervention training
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Schools, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review