Cited by 9Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Placebo, usual care and wait-list interventions for all mental health disorders

Open access
Faltinsen, Erlend, Todorovac, Adnan, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Gluud, Christian, Kongerslev, Mickey T, Simonsen, Erik, Storebø, Ole Jakob·2019·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Placebo, usual care

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.mr000050

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of waitlist control conditions in RCTs may overestimate treatment effects and artificially inflate effect sizes, so inclusion of an active control condition is recommended.

    “As the use of waitlist control conditions (WLCs) in RCT may overestimate treatment effects and thus artificially inflate the effect sizes of therapies, the inclusion of ACC in RCT is recommended (Faltinsen et al., 2019;Furukawa et al., 2014).”

    From Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic indicated preventive intervention for adolescents at high risk for anxiety and depressive disorders (2024) · cites this paper as Faltinsen et al., 2019

    The ‘Why it is important to do this review’ section says that adverse outcomes in wait-list participants could create a risk of overestimating psychiatric treatment effects, but presents this as a possibility the review will investigate. It does not recommend including an active control condition in RCTs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 115 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faltinsen, E., Todorovac, A., Hróbjartsson, A., Gluud, C., Kongerslev, M. T., Simonsen, E., & Storebø, O. J.
Affiliations
  • Region Zealand (DK)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-31
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2911306302
Cited by
9
References
115
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
placebo, usual care, waitlist control, mental illness, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review