Cited by 20Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Randomized controlled trial for selective preventive transdiagnostic intervention for adolescents at risk for emotional disorders

Open access
Vivas-Fernandez, Manuel, Garcia-Lopez, Luis-Joaquin, Piqueras, Jose A., Muela-Martinez, Jose-Antonio, Canals-Sans, Josefa, Espinosa-Fernandez, Lourdes, Jimenez-Vazquez, David, Diaz-Castela, Maria del Mar +3 more·2023·Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health

Abstract

Significant evidence does exist on the effectiveness of transdiagnostic interventions to improve emotional problems in clinical populations, and their application as universal and indicated prevention programs. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCT) studying selective transdiagnostic prevention intervention have been published. This is the first known RCT to evaluate the efficacy/effectiveness of an evidence-based selective prevention transdiagnostic program for emotional problems in adolescents. The impact of three different interventions was evaluated: (1) PROCARE (Preventive transdiagnostic intervention for Adolescents at Risk for Emotional disorders), which is a group-based, abbreviated version of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UP-A), along with adding a booster session to reduce risk of onset of anxiety and depression, (2) PROCARE + , which includes the PROCARE protocol along with personalized add-on modules tailored to match adolescents’ risk factors, and (3) an active control condition (ACC) based on emotional psychoeducation. In total, 208 adolescents (48.5% girls) evidencing high risk and low protective factors were randomized and allocated to PROCARE, PROCARE + or ACC. Data from 153 adolescents who completed all assessments in the different phases of the study were analyzed. Self- and parent-reported measures were taken at baseline, as well as after the intervention, a 6 month follow-up was carried out, together with a 1 month follow-up after the booster session. Differences between conditions were significant on most of the outcome measures, with superior effect sizes for PROCARE + in the short and long term. Interventions were acceptable in terms of acceptability, with good satisfaction rates. Tailored targeted selective transdiagnostic interventions focused on mitigating risk factors and promoting protective factors in vulnerable adolescents are promising.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13034-023-00616-9

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UP-A has been tested for universal prevention in an open trial compared to wait-list, for selective prevention in an RCT compared to active control at 6-month and 12-month follow-up, and for indicated preventive purposes in an initial cluster randomized wait-list-controlled trial.

    “It has been tested for universal prevention in an open trial and compared to a wait-list control group (García-Escalera et al., 2019, 2020), for selective prevention in a RCT compared to an active control group at 6-month (Vivas-Fernandez et al., 2023) and 12-month follow-up (Vivas-Fernandez et al., in press), as well as for indicated preventive purposes in an initial cluster randomized wait-list-”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16]Caldas, J. M. European Framework for Action on Mental Health and wellbeing [Final Conference]. EU Joint Action on mental health and well being, Brussells, Belgium. 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/guides_for_applicants/h2020-SC1-BHC-22-2019-framework-for-action_en.pdf.
  2. [27]Ehrenreich-May J Kennedy SM Sherman JA Bilek EL Buzzella BA Bennett SM Barlow DH The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents (UP-A; in unified protocols for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in children and adolescents) 2018 New York Oxford University Press
  3. [63]Larson, C.M. Stories: A revision of the willingness and action measure for children and adolescents (WAM-C/a) [Thesis]. University of North Texas. 2008.
  4. [111]World Health Organization (WHO). mhGAP Intervention Guide - Version 2.0. WHO press. 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549790 27786430

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vivas-Fernandez, M., Garcia-Lopez, L.-J., Piqueras, J. A., Muela-Martinez, J.-A., Canals-Sans, J., Espinosa-Fernandez, L., Jimenez-Vazquez, D., Diaz-Castela, M. D. M., Morales-Hidalgo, P., Rivera, M., & Ehrenreich-May, J.
Affiliations
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
Venue
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Published
2023-06-23
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1753-2000 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381839154
Cited by
20
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUJA (Universidad de Jaén) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • RUJA. Institutional Repository of Scientific Production of the University of Jaén (University of Jaén) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (Project PID2019-111138RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
  • Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Prevention and Health Promotion
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
transdiagnostic treatment, selective prevention, booster sessions, anxiety, depression, risk factors, protective factors, treatment acceptability, group intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review