Cited by 97Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: A meta-analytical review of randomized controlled trials

Sarin, Freddy, Wallin, Lennart, Widerlöv, Birgitta·2011·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK and in Sweden, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been recommended for schizophrenia. The two recent meta-analyses examined results soon after treatment and not at follow-up. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of CBT in people with schizophrenia, both after treatment and at follow-up, and to compare it with treatment as usual (TAU) and other psychological treatments. METHODS: The search was carried in the databases CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), PsycINFO and PubMed (Medline). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias. Two reviewers, working independently, extracted data. The results were analyzed using risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), mean difference (MD), or standardized mean difference (SMD). Outcome measures were symptoms, use of medication, relapse and clinically important improvement. RESULTS: When CBT was compared with other psychological treatments at follow-up, there was strong evidence (with small treatment effect) that intervention has an effect with positive symptoms (P = 0.02), negative symptoms (P = 0.03) and general symptoms (P = 0.003). After treatment, there was a trend in favor of CBT, but not statistically significantly so. CONCLUSION: It appears that the effect of CBT is delayed; it could be seen a few months after the treatment had terminated. Therapies for patients with schizophrenia that were 20 sessions long or more had better outcomes than those that were shorter.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08039488.2011.577188

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarin, F., Wallin, L., & Widerlöv, B.
Affiliations
  • Praktikertjänst (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Sarin, Freddy
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-05-13
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
162-174
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2149361395
Cited by
97
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, schizophrenia, treatment effectiveness, relapse, symptom relief, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, usual care, psychological intervention, follow-up outcomes, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review