The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Network Site Affordances and Their Relationship to Social Capital Processes
Abstract
From both the literature and the everyday experiences, it seems clear that social media are enabling new patterns of communication, interaction, and affiliation; how, why, and to what ends social media use is related to social capital outcomes is the focus of this chapter. The chapter synthesizes the literature on social network sites (SNSs) and social capital in order to describe these dynamics. When studying social media, it is important to remember that communication processes as well as social capital outcomes may be influenced by the sites’ affordances. The chapter explores the relationship between SNSs and social capital by looking at how social capital exchanges are facilitated by the three elements of SNSs, as delineated by Ellison and Boyd: the profile, the articulated network, and the content stream. Social grooming practices are activities that build trust and create expectations of reciprocal attention among network members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Self-citationThe Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Self-citationBurt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action
Lin, N. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815447 · Cited by 4,535
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,919
Self-citationPersonality and motivations associated with Facebook use
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 · Cited by 1,728
Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications
(2010) · A Networked Self · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-8 · Cited by 1,724 · cited 1×
“Looking at social media use more broadly, danah boyd (2010) describes a similar set of affordances, including persistence, replicability (the ability to duplicate content), scalability (akin to Treem and Leonardi's [2012] visibility affordance), and searchability, noting that these affordances…”
BackgroundDonath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004) · BT Technology Journal · doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047585.06264.cc · Cited by 1,399
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810385389 · Cited by 1,349 · cited 11×
“Although it is rare for people to try to Friend total strangers on Facebook (Ellison et al., 2011a), it is the case that Groups, hashtags, or other SNS features can make people more aware of others who share a particular interest, and to engage in communication around that topic.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationHogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318 · cited 1×
“…a diverse network comprised of ties from a wide variety of social contexts may lead users to censor their disclosures or not disclose any potentially sensitive information at all due to concerns about who will see the content and how different connections could interpret it (Hogan, 2010).”
BackgroundFacebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609360756 · Cited by 1,169 · cited 1×
“…purposes, ranging from social, such as allowing other users to find common ground, to psychological, in that profiles allow users to ideate future versions of self (Ellison et al., 2012), reflect their actual personality (Back et al., 2010) or engage in self-affirmation (Toma & Hancock, 2013).”
BackgroundSocial network activity and social well-being
Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753613 · Cited by 1,109 · cited 1×
“…of scholarship has documented how social media, specifically SNSs such as Facebook, have been used to support the informational and social support exchanges that comprise important aspects of social capital (Burke et al., 2010; Burke, Marlow, & Kraut, 2011; Ellison et al., 2007, 2011a, in press-b).”
BackgroundFacebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use
Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011 · Cited by 948
Self-citationKim, J., & Lee, J.-E. R. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0374 · Cited by 930 · cited 1×
“…al., 2009) and narcissism (Carpenter, 2012), have been positively linked to use of the site, while a number of other studies have established positive correlations between use of the site and increased well-being (Burke, Marlow, & Lento, 2010; Kim & Lee, 2011; Steinfield, Ellison, & Lampe, 2008).”
ResultEllison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078 · Cited by 916
Self-citationThe like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812472322 · Cited by 871
d., B. (2010) · In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites · doi:10.4324/9780203876527 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12033 · Cited by 1,209
Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13190 · Cited by 1,189
“…are evolving rapidly, from profiles that were originally static portraits of the owner to dynamic ‘toolkits’ that allow for interconnected streams of influence, conversations, and a mix of corporate, private, and public representations and uses of information and data (Ellison & Vitak, 2015).”
The Affordances of Social Media Platforms
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018) · The SAGE Handbook of Social Media · doi:10.4135/9781473984066.n14 · Cited by 1,083
Social Media Elements, Ecologies, and Effects
Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944 · Cited by 410
Self-citationFrison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215617506 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J.
- Venue
- The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-05
- Pages
- 203-227
- OpenAlex
- W1487170152
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 20
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
