Cited by 64Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognitive mechanisms underlying the emotional effects of bias modification

Hoppitt, Laura, Mathews, Andrew, Yiend, Jenny, Mackintosh, Bundy·2010·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

In this study we assessed the cognitive mechanisms underlying the affective consequences of modifying emotional processing biases. During ‘active’ training participants selected either threatening or non‐threatening meanings of emotionally ambiguous words, in contrast to ‘passive’ conditions in which participants read unambiguous words with equivalent valenced meanings. Both methods enhanced access to training‐congruent primed emotional meanings, as assessed in a lexical decision task, although neither method displayed evidence of an induced interpretive bias as it is usually understood. However, consistent with previous research, the methods differed in their emotional consequences: Active training had greater effects on anxiety while viewing an accident video than did passive exposure. We interpret these results to suggest that both forms of training enhance priming of a valenced category, but only active conditions induce an implicit production rule to generate and/or select emotional meanings, and that it is this latter process that is critical to the modification of emotionality. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.1678

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Hoppitt, Laura
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-18
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
312-325
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W2047738821
Cited by
64
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
interpretation bias, active training, passive exposure, affective priming, lexical decision, anxiety, emotional words

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review