Cited by 183Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Based on Slow-Paced Breathing With Immersive Virtual Reality Nature Scenery

Open access
Blum, Johannes, Rockstroh, Christoph, Göritz, Anja S.·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the benefits of using a virtual nature environment to administer immersive heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) based on slow-paced breathing. We compared the virtual reality (VR)-based HRV-BF with a standard implementation in a randomized controlled experiment with 60 healthy employees. After a cognitive stress induction, the participants performed a single-session of HRV-BF before repeating the cognitive stressor task. VR-based versus standard HRV-BF was comparable in terms of biofeedback performance (cardiac coherence and cardiac vagal tone). However, the VR-based implementation buffered perceived stress in the subsequent stressor task, increased relaxation self-efficacy more, reduced mind wandering, helped participants focus on the present moment, and helped preserve attentional resources. Potential long-term effects and generalizability need to be assessed in future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02172

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on VR for related techniques such as mindfulness is at the very early stages with predominantly single case studies and typically involves populations of adults without a mental health condition.

    “However, this research is at the very early stages with predominantly single case studies and typically involves populations of adults without a mental health condition.”

    From A Virtual Reality–Based Cognitive Defusion Application for Youth Depression and Anxiety: Mixed Methods Experimental Study. (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction discusses VR-assisted mindfulness, and the Limitations and Future Research section calls this an early attempt at VR-based HRV biofeedback. The paper studied healthy employees, but its randomized controlled experiment involved 60 participants—not a single case—and it does not establish that VR research on related techniques consists predominantly of single-case studies or typically excludes people with mental health conditions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A small number of studies have examined the use of VR for related techniques such as mindfulness, with preliminary evidence of positive outcomes.

    “A small number of studies have also examined the use of VR for related techniques such as mindfulness [31-34], with preliminary evidence of positive outcomes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gromala D. Tong X. Choo A. Karamnejad M. Shaw C. D. (2015). The virtual meditative walk: virtual reality therapy for chronic pain management. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems New York, NY: ACM pp. 521– 524.
  2. Kosunen I. Salminen M. Järvelä S. Ruonala A. Ravaja N. Jacucci G. (2016). RelaWorld: neuroadaptive and immersive virtual reality meditation system. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces New York, NY: ACM pp. 208– 217.
  3. Peek C. J. (2017). “ A primer of traditional biofeedback instrumentation” in Biofeedback. A practitioner’s guide. 4th Edn. eds. Schwartz M. S. Andrasik F. (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 35– 67.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blum, J., Rockstroh, C., & Göritz, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Blum, Johannes
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
10
Pages
2172-2172
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973709831
Cited by
183
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • German Research Foundation
  • University of Freiburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, slow-paced breathing, immersive virtual reality, perceived stress, mind wandering, attentional resources, cardiac coherence, cardiac vagal tone, workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review