Cited by 149Indigenous Health and EducationPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Tubers as fallback foods and their impact on Hadza hunter-gatherers.

Marlowe, Frank W., Berbesque, Julia C.·2009·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

The Hadza are hunter‐gatherers in Tanzania. Their diet can be conveniently categorized into five main categories: tubers, berries, meat, baobab, and honey. We showed the Hadza photos of these foods and asked them to rank them in order of preference. Honey was ranked the highest. Tubers, as expected from their low caloric value, were ranked lowest. Given that tubers are least preferred, we used kilograms of tubers arriving in camp across the year as a minimum estimate of their availability. Tubers fit the definition of fallback foods because they are the most continuously available but least preferred foods. Tubers are more often taken when berries are least available. We examined the impact of all foods by assessing variation in adult body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat (%BF) in relation to amount of foods arriving in camp. We found, controlling for region and season, women of reproductive age had a higher %BF in camps where more meat was acquired and a lower %BF where more tubers were taken. We discuss the implications of these results for the Hadza. We also discuss the importance of tubers in human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol, 140:751–758, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.21040

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many hunter-gatherers seasonally consume a large portion of their daily calories as honey.

    “For example, while Western diets are certainly more sugar-rich and energy-dense than more “traditional” diets and wild foods [4], [8], [9], many hunter-gatherers seasonally consume a large portion of their daily calories as honey [10], [11] (Fig. S2), which has high concentrations of glucose and fructose [12].”

    From Hunter-gatherer energetics and human obesity (2012) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marlowe, F. W., & Berbesque, J. C.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Marlowe, Frank W.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-06
Volume
140
Issue
4
Pages
751-758
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2016896745
Cited by
149
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
tubers, fallback foods, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, food preferences, body fat percentage, body mass index, diet, meat consumption, human evolution, food availability, women of reproductive age
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Body Composition, Diet, Ethnicity, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Seasons, Sex Factors, Tanzania, Body Mass Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Plant Tubers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review