Cited by 319Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Connections of the medial posterior parietal cortex (area 7m) in the monkey

Open access
Leichnetz, George R.·2001·The Anatomical Record

Abstract

The afferent and efferent cortical and subcortical connections of the medial posterior parietal cortex (area 7m) were studied in cebus (Cebus apella) and macaque (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys using the retrograde and anterograde capabilities of the horseradish peroxidase (HRP) technique. The principal intraparietal corticocortical connections of area 7m in both cebus and macaque cases were with the ipsilateral medial bank of the intraparietal sulcus (MIP) and adjacent superior parietal lobule (area 5), inferior parietal lobule (area 7a), lateral bank of the IPS (area 7ip), caudal parietal operculum (PGop), dorsal bank of the caudal superior temporal sulcus (visual area MST), and medial prestriate cortex (including visual area PO and caudalmedial lobule). Its principal frontal corticocortical connections were with the prefrontal cortex in the shoulder above the principal sulcus and the cortex in the shoulder above the superior ramus of the arcuate sulcus (SAS), the area purported to contain the smooth eye movement‐related frontal eye field (FEFsem) in the cebus monkey by other investigators. There were moderate connections with the cortex in the rostral bank of the arcuate sulcus (purported to contain the saccade‐related frontal eye field; FEFsac), supplementary eye field (SEF), and rostral dorsal premotor area (PMDr). Area 7m also had major connections with the cingulate cortex (area 23), particularly the ventral bank of the cingulate sulcus. The principal subcortical connections of area 7m were with the dorsal portion of the ventrolateral thalamic (VLc) nucleus, lateral posterior thalamic nucleus, lateral pulvinar, caudal mediodorsal thalamic nucleus and medial pulvinar, central lateral, central superior lateral, and central inferior intralaminar thalamic nuclei, dorsolateral caudate nucleus and putamen, middle region of the claustrum, nucleus of the diagonal band, zona incerta, pregeniculate nucleus, anterior and posterior pretectal nuclei, intermediate layer of the superior colliculus, nucleus of Darkschewitsch and dorsomedial parvicellular red nucleus (macaque cases only), dorsal, dorsolateral and lateral basilar pontine nuclei, nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis, locus ceruleus, and superior central nucleus. The findings are discussed in terms of the possibility that area 7m contains a “medial parietal eye field” and belongs to a neural network of oculomotor‐related structures that plays a role in the control of eye movement. Anat Rec 263:215–236, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ar.1082

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]24. Mountcastle V, Plum F, editors. The nervous system, higher func- tions of the brain, vol. 5. Handbook of physiology, Washington, DC: American Physiological Society. p 373-417.
  2. [45]45. May PJ, Hall WC, Porter JD, Sakai ST. 1993. The comparative anat- omy of nigral and cerebellar control over tectally initiated orienting movements. In: Mano N, Hamada I, DeLong MR, editors. Role of the cerebellum and basal ganglia in voluntary movement. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 221-231.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leichnetz, G. R.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Leichnetz, George R.
Venue
The Anatomical Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04-27
Volume
263
Issue
2
Pages
215-236
ISSN
  • 0003-276X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0185
OpenAlex
W1985804114
Cited by
318
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Anatomical Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
corticocortical connections, subcortical connections, intraparietal sulcus, superior parietal lobule, inferior parietal lobule, frontal eye field, supplementary eye field, cingulate cortex, thalamus, superior colliculus, basal ganglia, claustrum, pretectal nuclei, pontine nuclei, Cebus apella, Macaca fascicularis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cebus, Eye Movements, Frontal Lobe, Horseradish Peroxidase, Macaca fascicularis, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review