Cited by 105Impact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMedia and Digital Communication

Impacts of the use of social network sites on users psychological well-being: A systematic review

Open access
Erfani, Seyedezahra Shadi, Abedin, Babak·2018·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

As Social Network Sites (SNSs) are increasingly becoming part of people's everyday lives, the implications of their use need to be investigated and understood. We conducted a systematic literature review to lay the groundwork for understanding the relationship between SNS use and users' psychological well‐being and for devising strategies for taking advantage of this relationship. The review included articles published between 2003 and 2016, extracted from major academic databases. Findings revealed that the use of SNSs is both positively and negatively related to users' psychological well‐being. We discuss the factors that moderate this relationship and their implications on users' psychological well‐being. Many of the studies we reviewed lacked a sound theoretical justification for their findings and most involved young and healthy students, leaving other cohorts of SNS users neglected. The paper concludes with the presentation of a platform for future investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.24015

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most current understanding of the interaction between social media use and psychosocial outcomes comes from research in younger people.

    “Most of our current understanding of the interaction between social media use and psychosocial outcomes comes from research in younger people who make up the largest cohort of active social media users around the world (Erfani & Abedin, 2018).”

    From The relationship between social media use and psychosocial outcomes in older adults: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Erfani & Abedin, 2018

    The Demographics section reports that most reviewed studies sampled students, and the section on broadening recruitment says studies of SNS use and psychological well-being have largely relied on students and adolescents. This supports the claim that understanding is drawn mainly from research in younger people. The paper does not establish the citing sentence’s additional assertion that younger people are the largest cohort of active social media users worldwide. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dare, J. (2009) Women and friendship: The role of communication tech- nologies in sustaining critical connections. Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship. Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Annual Conference.
  2. Erfani, S., Abedin, B., & Daneshgar, F. (2013a) Investigating the impact of Facebook use on cancer survivors' psychological well-being. Pro- ceedings of the Nineteenth American Conference on Information, Chi- cago, August, 15-17
  3. Liu, C. Y., & Yu, C. P. (2013) Can Facebook use induce well-being? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 674-678.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erfani, S. S., & Abedin, B.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Erfani, Seyedezahra Shadi
  • Abedin, Babak
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-23
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
900-912
ISSN
  • 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1643
OpenAlex
W2792215598
Cited by
105
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social network sites, psychological well-being, social media use, moderators, positive and negative effects of social media, young adults, students, digital well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review