Danish university policies on generative AI: Problems, assumptions and sustainability blind spots
Open accessAbstract
The sudden and meteoric rise of generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) has raised fundamental concerns for universities. Using Bacchi’s methodology on ‘problematisation’, we analyse which concerns Danish universities have addressed through their policies and guidelines. We identify three key problematisations: assessment integrity, legality of data and veracity. While each of these problematisations involves specific limitations, together they also strongly emphasise symbolic and epistemological issues and consequently mostly ignore the materiality of genAI, for example, in terms of labour and energy use. Drawing on critical AI studies, this article argues that universities should also consider the huge planetarycosts that (gen)AI poses as well as the full range of AI’s exploitative business models and practices. Universities should integrate these considerations into both their decision-making on (not) using certain technologies and their policies and guidelines for research and teaching, just as sustainability is already a criterion in their travel or investment policies today.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 'black box' nature of many GenAI systems means there is significant uncertainty about how user data is actually utilized for training or profiling, and whether it is shared with third parties.
“The”
From MAPPING GENERATIVE AI'S ETHICAL ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A FELT-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [PEMETAAN ISU ETIKA GENERATIVE AI DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS BERPANDUAN FELT] (2025) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
The paper’s discussion of Danish university policies describes a perceived lack of transparency about the use of inputted data and notes that OpenAI’s terms allow such data to be used for training (page unavailable). Its ‘Concerns regarding genAI in academia’ section also raises the risk of personal data reaching unauthorised persons. It does not specifically attribute these uncertainties to a ‘black box’ mechanism or discuss profiling or sharing with third parties. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe development and operation of GenAI carry significant environmental costs, including high energy and resource consumption, and raise concerns about labor exploitation and job displacement.
“The development and operation of GenAI carry significant environmental costs, including high energy and resource consumption, and raise concerns about labor exploitation and job displacement.”
From MAPPING GENERATIVE AI'S ETHICAL ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A FELT-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [PEMETAAN ISU ETIKA GENERATIVE AI DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS BERPANDUAN FELT] (2025) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
The section “Critical AI and data studies’ concerns about (gen)AI” describes substantial energy and material use during AI production, training and deployment, and gives an example of poorly paid, psychologically unsupported data-labeling work. The available passages do not address job displacement; searches for job replacement and employment did not locate support for that part of the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenAI systems inherit and amplify existing biases in their training data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes.
“GenAI systems inherit and amplify existing biases in their training data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes.”
From MAPPING GENERATIVE AI'S ETHICAL ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A FELT-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [PEMETAAN ISU ETIKA GENERATIVE AI DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS BERPANDUAN FELT] (2025) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
In the discussion of Danish university policies (page unavailable), the paper links bias in training data to unequal results and warns of the reproduction of inequalities through biased and discriminating output. It does not establish that GenAI amplifies those biases, rather than reproducing them. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenAI causes environmental damage, with CO2 emissions and water consumption particularly concerning.
“Finally, genAI causes environmental damage, with CO2 emissions and water consumption particularly concerning (Carrigan, 2024;de Fine Licht, 2024;Driessens & Pischetola, 2024).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
OpenAI created ChatGPT by extracting 300 billion words from online sources without formal consent.
“On the planetary scale, OpenAI created ChatGPT by extracting 300 billion words from online sources without formal consent (Driessens & Pischetola, 2024).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
In the study context, genAI's environmental impact was not discussed in university policy.
“In our study context, as in other international settings, genAI's environmental impact was not discussed in university policy (Dabis & Csáki, 2024;Driessens & Pischetola, 2024;Erhardt et al., 2025).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
AI models, trained on massive datasets reflecting 'long-standing biases existing in society,' can perpetuate undesirable stereotypes.
“AI models, trained on massive datasets reflecting”
From MAPPING GENERATIVE AI'S ETHICAL ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A FELT-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [PEMETAAN ISU ETIKA GENERATIVE AI DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS BERPANDUAN FELT] (2025) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
Driessens and Pischetola [90] found that the huge planetary costs of GenAI and the exploitative business models and practices are mostly left unproblematized in the policies.
“Driessens and Pischetola [90] also found that the huge planetary costs of GenAI and the exploitative business models and practices are mostly left unproblematized in the policies.”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
Driessens and Pischetola [90] and Luo [213] adopted Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be?' framework.
“Driessens and Pischetola [90] and Luo [213] adopted Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be?' framework [29]”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
Driessens and Pischetola [90] identified three key problematisations in the analyzed policies: assessment integrity, legality of data, and veracity.
“Driessens and Pischetola [90] identified three key problematisations in the analyzed policies: assessment integrity, legality of data, and veracity.”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
Even seemingly innocuous text input can allow LLMs to infer user characteristics such as age, gender, income, and location, posing re-identification risks.
“Even seemingly innocuous text input can allow Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer user characteristics such as age, gender, income, and location, posing re-identification risks.”
From MAPPING GENERATIVE AI'S ETHICAL ISSUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A FELT-GUIDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [PEMETAAN ISU ETIKA GENERATIVE AI DI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI: TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS BERPANDUAN FELT] (2025) · cites this paper as Driessens & Pischetola, 2024
The ‘Concerns regarding genAI in academia’ section discusses risks of exposing personal data and search content, but does not address whether LLMs can infer age, gender, income, or location from innocuous text, or whether such inference creates re-identification risks. Searches for those characteristics and for inference from text input found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · see citing works
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087 · see citing works
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079 · see citing works
What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
Lo, C. K. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040410 · Cited by 2,024 · see citing works
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 · Cited by 1,577 · see citing works
Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24750 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
ChatGPT in higher education: considerations for academic integrity and student learning
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
How Is ChatGPT’s Behavior Changing Over Time?
Chen, L., Zaharia, M., & Zou, J. (2024) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.5317da47 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4404380 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Yu, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Luo (Jess), J. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Ableism, technoableism, and future AI
Shew, A. (2020) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2020.2967492 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring — and mostly secret
Crawford, K. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-00478-x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Pawelec, M. (2022) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
OpenAI ChatGPT Generated Results: Similarity Index of Artificial Intelligence-Based Contents
Ventayen, R. J. M. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4332664 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Xiao, P., Chen, Y., & Bao, W. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4458269 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Albayati, H. (2024). Investigating undergraduate students' perceptions and awareness of using ChatGPT as a regular assistance tool: A user acceptance perspective study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100203 · DOI · Paper page
- Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217887 · DOI
- Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson.
- Bacchi, C. L. (2019). Introducing the 'What's the Problem Represented to be?' approach. In M. Tröndle & C. Steigerwald (Eds.), Anthologie Kulturpolitik: Einführende Beiträge zu Geschichte, Funktionen und Diskur- sen der Kulturpolitikforschung (pp. 427-430). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839437322-031 · DOI
- Baldassarre, M. T., Caivano, D., Fernandez Nieto, B., Gigante, D., & Ragone, A. (2023). The Social Impact of Generative AI: An Analysis on ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582515.3609555 · DOI
- Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2018). The trouble with "screen time" rules. In G. Mascheroni, C. L. Ponte, & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital Parenting: The challenges for families in the digital age (pp. 179-187). Nordi- com, University of Gothenburg. http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1265024&dswid=-814
- Brevini, B. (2020). Black boxes, not green: Mythologizing artificial intelligence and omitting the environ- ment. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 2053951720935141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720935141 · DOI · Paper page
- Brevini, B. (2021). Creating the technological saviour: Discourses on AI in Europe and the legitimation of super capitalism. In P. Verdegem (Ed.), AI for Everyone? Critical perspectives (pp. 145-159). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book55.i. · DOI
- Brodie, P. (2023). Data infrastructure studies on an unequal planet. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231182402. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231182402 · DOI
- Callanan, E., Mbakwe, A., Papadimitriou, A., Pei, Y., Sibue, M., Zhu, X., Ma, Z., Liu, X., & Shah, S. (2023). Can GPT models be Financial Analysts? An Evaluation of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on mock CFA Exams (arXiv:2310.08678). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08678 · DOI
- Chavanayarn, S. (2023). Navigating ethical complexities through epistemological analysis of ChatGPT. Bul- letin of Science, Technology & Society, 02704676231216355. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676231216355 · DOI
- Cheng, M. W. T., & Yim, I. H. Y. (2024). Examining the use of ChatGPT in public universities in Hong Kong: A case study of restricted access areas. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00081-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Choi, J., Hickman, K., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. (2022). ChatGPT goes to law school. Journal of Legal Education, 71(3), 387-400. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4335905 · DOI
- Coeckelbergh M (2022) The political philosophy of AI. Polity Press.
- Coeckelbergh, M., & Gunkel, D. J. (2023). ChatGPT: deconstructing the debate and moving it forward. AI & SOCIETY, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01710-4 · DOI
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropri- ating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754 · DOI · Paper page
- Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392 · DOI · Paper page
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · DOI · Paper page
- Flores-Vivar, J. M., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artifi- cial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4). Comunicar, 31(74), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03 · DOI
- Goodlad, L. M. E. (2023). Humanities in the Loop. Critical AI, 1(1-2), https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703X-10734016 · DOI
- Gorichanaz, T. (2023). Accused: How students respond to allegations of using ChatGPT on assessments. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2254787 · DOI · Paper page
- Hagendorff, T., Fabi, S., & Kosinski, M. (2023). Human-like intuitive behavior and reasoning biases emerged in large language models but disappeared in ChatGPT. Nature Computational Science, 3(10), 833-838. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hogan, M. (2018). Big data ecologies. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(3), 631-657. https://ephemerajournal.org/index.php/contribution/big-data-ecologies Olivier Driessens & Magda Pischetola Article: Danish university policies on generative AI Huh, S. (2023). Are ChatGPT's knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: A descriptive study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.1 · DOI · Paper page
- İpek, Z. H., Gözüm, A. I. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the Chat- GPT AI system: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123. · DOI
- Jo, H. (2023). Decoding the ChatGPT mystery: A comprehensive exploration of factors driving AI language model adoption. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231202764 · DOI
- Kaltheuner, F. (2021). AI snake oil, pseudoscience and hype: An interview with Arvind Narayanan. In F. Kaltheuner (Ed.), Fake AI (pp. 19-38). Meatspace Press.
- Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT-A challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1056. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03271 · DOI · Paper page
- Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., Leon, L. D., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., & Tseng, V. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A., & Ren, S. (2023). Making AI less 'thirsty': Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models (arXiv:2304.03271). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03271 · DOI · Paper page
- Linderoth, C., Hultén, M., & Stenliden, L. (2024). Competing visions of Artificial Intelligence in education- A heuristic analysis on sociotechnical imaginaries and problematizations in policy guidelines. Policy Futures in Education, 14782103241228900. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241228900 · DOI
- Lund, B. D., & Naheem, K. t. (2024). Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of Artificial Intelligence author- ship policies in top academic journals. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1582 · DOI
- Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34 · DOI · Paper page
- Munn, L., Magee, L., & Arora, V. (2023). Truth machines: Synthesizing veracity in AI language models. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01756-4 Article: Danish university policies on generative AI Olivier Driessens & Magda Pischetola Newfield, C. (2023). How to make "AI" intelligent; or, the question of epistemic equality. Critical AI, 1(1-2), https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703X-10734076 · DOI
- Oravec, J. A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence implications for academic cheating: Expanding the dimensions of responsible human-AI collaboration with ChatGPT. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 213-237.
- Pischetola, M. (2021). Re-imagining digital technology in education through critical and neo-materialist insights. Digital Education Review, 40(2), 154-171, https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2021.40.154-171 · DOI
- Rahm, L., & Rahm-Skågeby, J. (2023). Imaginaries and problematisations: A heuristic lens in the age of artifi- cial intelligence in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1147-1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13319 · DOI
- Rawas, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640 · DOI
- Roemer, G., Li, A., Mahmood, U., Dauer, L., & Bellamy, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence model GPT4 nar- rowly fails simulated radiological protection exam. Journal of Radiological Protection. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad1fdf · DOI
- Selwyn, N. (2024). On the limits of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Pedagogikk Og Kritikk, 10. https://doi.org/10.23865/ntpk.v10.6062 · DOI · Paper page
- Størup, J. O., & Lieberoth, A. (2023). What's the problem with "screen time"? A content analysis of domi- nant voices and worries in three years of national print media. Convergence, 29(1), 201-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211065299 · DOI
- Tacheva, J., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2023). AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking systems of oppression in generative AI's global order. Big Data & Society, 10(2), 20539517231219241. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219241 · DOI · Paper page
- Taffel, S. (2015). Archaeologies of electronic waste. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2(1), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v2i1.27119 · DOI
- Taffel, S. (2023). Data and oil: Metaphor, materiality and metabolic rifts. New Media & Society, 25(5), 980-998. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211017887 · DOI
- ThankGod Chinonso, E. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on privacy and data protection laws, SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4574016 TV 2. (2023, June 30). Hver tiende studerende har snydt til eksamen med ChatGPT [Every tenth student has cheated at exams with ChatGPT]. nyheder.tv2.dk. https://nyheder.tv2.dk/tech/2023-06-30-hver-tiende-studerende-har-snydt-til-eksamen-med-chatgpt · DOI
- Uzun, L. (2023). ChatGPT and academic integrity concerns: Detecting artificial intelligence generated content. Language Education and Technology, 3(1), 45-54.
- Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920 · DOI · Paper page
- Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press.
- Winograd, A. (2023). Loose-lipped large language models spill your secrets: The privacy implications of large language models. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 36(2), 616-656. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v36/Winograd-Loose-Lipped-LLMs.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kangwa, D., Msafiri, M. M., & Fute, A. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70109 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Barus, O., Hidayanto, A. N., & Eitiveni, I. (2025) · Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah · doi:10.19166/pji.v21i2.10020 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education
Mak, J., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Clear, T., Clear, A., Abluwi, I., Andrei, O., Angeli, L., MacNeil, S., Oyelere, S. S., Hale Rattigan, M., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3760545.3783975 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Gillette, M., Wackenhut, A., & Olsson, E. (2026) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/yf2gt848
“On the planetary scale, OpenAI created ChatGPT by extracting 300 billion words from online sources without formal consent (Driessens & Pischetola, 2024).”
Influential
- Authors
- Driessens, O., & Pischetola, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research
- Published
- 2024-08-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 76
- Pages
- 31-52
- ISSN
- 0900-9671 (ISSN-L)
- 1901-9726
- OpenAlex
- W4402099135
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- MedieKultur Journal of media and communication research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- generative AI, AI policy in higher education, problematization, assessment integrity, honesty, critical AI studies, environmental costs of AI, energy consumption, AI business models, epistemology of AI, Danish universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review