Cited by 330Neural Networks and ApplicationsMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multimodal Neurons in Artificial Neural Networks

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23915/distill.00030

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many models form at least some interpretable features.

    “Many models form at least some interpretable features.”

    From Toy Models of Superposition (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Author Contributions section reports the discovery of many multimodal neurons in CLIP and says that some neuron activations were interpretable. That supports the existence of interpretable features in the model studied, but our copy does not establish the claim across many models. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is evidence of interpretable neurons in RNNs, convolutional neural networks, and in some limited cases, transformer language models.

    “There is evidence of interpretable neurons in RNNs ( e.g. ), convolutional neural networks ( see generally e.g. ; individual neuron families ), and in some limited cases, transformer language models ( see detailed discussion in our previous paper ).”

    From Toy Models of Superposition (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    The citation is attached to the clause about interpretable neurons in transformer language models. The available passages from the Author Contributions section describe multimodal neurons in CLIP, while searches for “transformer language models,” “transformer,” and “language models” found no passage addressing interpretable neurons in transformer language models. The RNN and CNN examples have separate citations in the printed sentence. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goh, G., Cammarata, N., Voss, C., Carter, S., Petrov, M., Schubert, L., Radford, A., & Olah, C.
Affiliations
  • OpenAI (United States) (US)
  • Observable
  • None
Venue
Distill
Published
2021-03-04
Volume
6
Issue
3
ISSN
2476-0757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134095442
Cited by
330
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 27
FWCI
16.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Distill (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
artificial neural networks, multimodal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review