The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The somatic mutation theory of cancer: growing problems with the paradigm?
Abstract
The somatic mutation theory has been the prevailing paradigm in cancer research for the last 50 years. Its premises are: (1) cancer is derived from a single somatic cell that has accumulated multiple DNA mutations, (2) the default state of cell proliferation in metazoa is quiescence, and (3) cancer is a disease of cell proliferation caused by mutations in genes that control proliferation and the cell cycle. From this compelling simplicity, an increasingly complicated picture has emerged as more than 100 oncogenes and 30 tumor suppressor genes have been identified. To accommodate this complexity, additional ad hoc explanations have been postulated. After a critical review of the data gathered from this perspective, an alternative research program has been proposed. It is based on the tissue organization field theory, the premises of which are that carcinogenesis represents a problem of tissue organization, comparable to organogenesis, and that proliferation is the default state of all cells. The merits of these competing theories are evaluated herein. BioEssays 26:1097–1107, 2004. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS
MCGUIRE, J. E. (1963) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1963.tb00813.x · Cited by 8,424
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division
Levine, A. J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 · Cited by 7,693
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Morgan, D., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2017) · W.W. Norton eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315735368 · Cited by 6,365
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
Tumorigenic conversion of primary embryo fibroblasts requires at least two cooperating oncogenes
Land, H., Parada, L. F., & Weinberg, R. A. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/304596a0 · Cited by 2,804
Bissell, M. J., & Radisky, D. (2001) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/35094059 · Cited by 2,180
Gautier, J. (1993) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(93)90025-i · Cited by 2,165
Addiction to Oncogenes--the Achilles Heal of Cancer
Weinstein, I. B. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073096 · Cited by 1,728
Weaver, V. M., Petersen, O. W., Wang, F., Larabell, C. A., Briand, P., Damsky, C., & Bissell, M. J. (1997) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.137.1.231 · Cited by 1,483
Cited by
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., Bourguignon, J.-P., Giudice, L. C., Hauser, R., Prins, G. S., Soto, A. M., Zoeller, R. T., & Gore, A. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0002 · Cited by 4,585
Self-citationOn the Origin of Cancer Metastasis
Seyfried, T. N., & Huysentruyt, L. C. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis · doi:10.1615/critrevoncog.v18.i1-2.40 · Cited by 1,196
Environmental causes of cancer: endocrine disruptors as carcinogens
Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C. (2010) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.87 · Cited by 573
Self-citationCancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics
Seyfried, T. N., Flores, R. E., Poff, A. M., & D'Agostino, D. P. (2014) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgt480 · Cited by 472
Bavik, C., Coleman, I., Dean, J. P., Knudsen, B., Plymate, S., & Nelson, P. S. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-1716 · Cited by 453
Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201100025 · Cited by 349
Self-citationApplication of Proteomics in Cancer: Recent Trends and Approaches for Biomarkers Discovery
Kwon, Y. W., Jo, H.-S., Bae, S., Seo, Y., Song, P., Song, M., & Yoon, J. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.747333 · Cited by 268
The Role of Phenolic Compounds in the Fight against Cancer – A Review
Carocho, M., & Ferreira, I. (2013) · Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/18715206113139990301 · Cited by 267
Street, M. E., Angelini, S., Bernasconi, S., Burgio, E., Cassio, A., Catellani, C., Cirillo, F., Deodati, A., Fabbrizi, E., Fanos, V., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19061647 · Cited by 257
Lobikin, M., Chernet, B., Lobo, D., & Levin, M. (2012) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065002 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Soto, A. M., & Sonnenschein, C.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1097-1107
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W2035238501
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
