Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital microfabrication of user‐defined 3D microstructures in cell‐laden hydrogels

Open access
Soman, Pranav, Chung, Peter H., Zhang, A. Ping, Chen, Shaochen·2013·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Complex 3D interfacial arrangements of cells are found in several in vivo biosystems such as blood vasculature, renal glomeruli, and intestinal villi. Current tissue engineering techniques fail to develop suitable 3D microenvironments to evaluate the concurrent effects of complex topography and cell encapsulation. There is a need to develop new fabrication approaches that control cell density and distribution within complex 3D features. In this work, we present a dynamic projection printing process that allows rapid construction of complex 3D structures using custom‐defined computer‐aided‐design (CAD) files. Gelatin‐methacrylate (GelMA) constructs featuring user‐defined spiral, pyramid, flower, and dome micro‐geometries were fabricated with and without encapsulated cells. Encapsulated cells demonstrate good cell viability across all geometries both on the scaffold surface and internal to the structures. Cells respond to geometric cues individually as well as collectively throughout the larger‐scale patterns. Time‐lapse observations also reveal the dynamic nature of mechanical interactions between cells and micro‐geometry. When compared to conventional cell‐seeding, cell encapsulation within complex 3D patterned scaffolds provides long‐term control over proliferation, cell morphology, and geometric guidance. Overall, this biofabrication technique offers a flexible platform to evaluate cell interactions with complex 3D micro‐features, with the ability to scale‐up towards high‐throughput screening platforms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110: 3038–3047. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.24957

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Soman, P., Chung, P. H., Zhang, A. P., & Chen, S.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-03
Volume
110
Issue
11
Pages
3038-3047
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W1947875118
Cited by
207
References
7
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.