The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital microfabrication of user‐defined 3D microstructures in cell‐laden hydrogels
Open accessAbstract
Complex 3D interfacial arrangements of cells are found in several in vivo biosystems such as blood vasculature, renal glomeruli, and intestinal villi. Current tissue engineering techniques fail to develop suitable 3D microenvironments to evaluate the concurrent effects of complex topography and cell encapsulation. There is a need to develop new fabrication approaches that control cell density and distribution within complex 3D features. In this work, we present a dynamic projection printing process that allows rapid construction of complex 3D structures using custom‐defined computer‐aided‐design (CAD) files. Gelatin‐methacrylate (GelMA) constructs featuring user‐defined spiral, pyramid, flower, and dome micro‐geometries were fabricated with and without encapsulated cells. Encapsulated cells demonstrate good cell viability across all geometries both on the scaffold surface and internal to the structures. Cells respond to geometric cues individually as well as collectively throughout the larger‐scale patterns. Time‐lapse observations also reveal the dynamic nature of mechanical interactions between cells and micro‐geometry. When compared to conventional cell‐seeding, cell encapsulation within complex 3D patterned scaffolds provides long‐term control over proliferation, cell morphology, and geometric guidance. Overall, this biofabrication technique offers a flexible platform to evaluate cell interactions with complex 3D micro‐features, with the ability to scale‐up towards high‐throughput screening platforms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110: 3038–3047. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue
Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E. G., & Stelzer, E. H. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2236 · Cited by 2,817
Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 · Cited by 2,377
Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues
Miller, J. S., Stevens, K. R., Yang, M. T., Baker, B. M., Nguyen, D.-H. T., Cohen, D. M., Toro, E., Chen, A. A., Galie, P. A., Yu, X., et al. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3357 · Cited by 1,917
High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array
Tung, Y.-C., Hsiao, A. Y., Allen, S. G., Torisawa, Y.-S., Ho, M., & Takayama, S. (2011) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c0an00609b · Cited by 969
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1883 · Cited by 890
Gauvin, R., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, J. W., Soman, P., Zorlutuna, P., Nichol, J. W., Bae, H., Chen, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048 · Cited by 641 · cited 2×
“Low and high strain bulk moduli of the 10% GelMA scaffolds were 75 and 580 kPa respectively (Gauvin et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationSubstrate topography shapes cell function
Kulangara, K., & Leong, K. W. (2009) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b910132m · Cited by 145
Cited by
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels
Yue, K., Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Alvarez, M. M., Tamayol, A., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 · Cited by 3,146
“[42] Soman P, Chung PH, Zhang AP, Chen S.”
BackgroundMethodThe upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics
Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S., & Folch, A. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00163g · Cited by 1,123
Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting
Ma, X., Qu, X., Zhu, W., Li, Y.-S., Yuan, S., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Wang, P., Lai, C. S. E., Zanella, F., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524510113 · Cited by 872
Self-citation3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering
Zhu, W., Ma, X., Gou, M., Mei, D., Zhang, K., & Chen, S. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014 · Cited by 822
Self-citationAu, A. K., Huynh, W., Horowitz, L. F., & Folch, A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201504382 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Soman, P., Chung, P. H., Zhang, A. P., & Chen, S.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-03
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3038-3047
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W1947875118
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.