The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The motivational basis of organizational behavior
Abstract
How, and to what extent, do people become involved in an organization and committed to its goals? If an organization is to survive and to function effectively, it must require not one, but several different types of behavior from most of its members, and the motivations for these different types of behavior may also differ. How does a business organization attract the kind of people it needs? How does it hold them? How does it induce both reliable performance and spontaneous innovation an the part of its members? This paper proposes an analytic framework for understanding the complexities of motivational problems in an organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Cited by
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600307 · Cited by 5,897
Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259118 · Cited by 4,965
HELPING AND VOICE EXTRA-ROLE BEHAVIORS: EVIDENCE OF CONSTRUCT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY.
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256902 · Cited by 3,178
Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour
Janssen, O. (2000) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317900167038 · Cited by 2,816
CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL EXCHANGE.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256704 · Cited by 1,929
The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259293 · Cited by 2,135
Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159587 · Cited by 1,623
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269 · Cited by 1,210
Trust in Management and Performance: Who Minds the Shop While the Employees Watch the Boss?
Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803928 · Cited by 1,200
DEVELOPMENT OF A LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE: A LONGITUDINAL TEST.
BAUER, T. N., & GREEN, S. G. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257068 · Cited by 944
Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2971 · Cited by 898
PERSONAL INITIATIVE AT WORK: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EAST AND WEST GERMANY.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256630 · Cited by 877
Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200 · Cited by 318
Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours
Warr, P., Bindl, U. K., Parker, S. K., & Inceoglu, I. (2014) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.744449 · Cited by 245
VIGODA‐GADOT, E. (2006) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00297.x · Cited by 216
Belwalkar, S., Vohra, V., & Pandey, A. (2018) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-05-2016-0096 · Cited by 151
Internal communicators’ understanding of the definition and importance of employee advocacy
Thelen, P. D. (2020) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101946 · Cited by 95
(2013) · Cited by 43
Desselle, S. P., & Semsick, G. R. (2016) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8010168 · Cited by 21
Behold the best and worst of me: the impostor phenomenon and academic behavior in the business area,
Meurer, A. M., & Costa, F. (2020) · Revista Contabilidade & Finanças · doi:10.1590/1808-057x201910370 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, D.
- Venue
- Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1964
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 1092-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 0005-7940
- 1099-1743
- OpenAlex
- W2072906392
- Cited by
- 1,632
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
