Cited by 301Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceAccounting and Financial Management

Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country

Amran, Azlan, Haniffa, Roszaini·2011·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

Current development in social accounting presents an interesting phenomenon. Companies are increasingly engaging in sustainability initiatives and reporting their activities in annual reports, company websites and other media of communication. Unlike previous studies, which have mainly used ex post content analysis of annual reports or other published data to study the relationship between disclosure and possible determinants, this study starts with an interview with the local preparer before the data is triangulated to determine the significant possible determinants. The interview findings are interpreted through institutional theory for possible identification of determinants. Initially, the interview findings indicate that all three mechanisms of isomorphism, the coercive, the normative and the mimetic, contribute to Malaysian company sustainability reporting. However, the regression results prove that only a government linked company in the plantation industry, which is large in size, has a significant amount of sustainability reporting. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.672

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from wider studies of drivers of sustainability-related initiatives in developing countries indicates that normative forces are not strong and that only coercive mechanisms have an effect.

    “there is some evidence from wider studies of drivers of sustainability-related initiatives in developing countries that normative forces are not strong and that only coercive mechanisms have an effect (See Amran & Haniffa 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amran, A., & Haniffa, R.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Bradford (GB)
Corresponding author
Amran, Azlan
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-22
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
141-156
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W2108036429
Cited by
301
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
23.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
Keywords
sustainability reporting, determinants of disclosure, institutional theory, isomorphism, coercive isomorphism, normative isomorphism, mimetic isomorphism, government-linked companies, plantation industry, firm size, Malaysian companies, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review