CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanowarming of vitrified pancreatic islets as a cryopreservation technology for transplantation

Wakabayashi, Taisei, Kaneko, Masahiro, Nakai, Tomoki, Horie, Masanobu, Fujimoto, Hiroyuki, Takahashi, Masazumi, Tanoue, Shota, Ito, Akira·2023·Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
DOI 10.1002/btm2.10416PMC PMC10354753
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Biobanking of pancreatic islets for transplantation could solve the shortage of donors, and cryopreservation of vitrified islets is a possible approach. However, a technological barrier is rewarming of large volumes both uniformly and rapidly to prevent ice formation due to devitrification. Here, we describe successful recovery of islets from the vitrified state using a volumetric rewarming technology called “nanowarming,” which is inductive heating of magnetic nanoparticles under an alternating magnetic field. Convective warming using a 37°C water bath as the gold standard for rewarming of vitrified samples resulted in a decrease in the viability of mouse islets in large volumes (>1 ml) owing to devitrification caused by slow warming. Nanowarming showed uniform and rapid rewarming of vitrified islets in large volumes. The viability of nanowarmed islets was significantly improved and islets transplanted into streptozotocin‐induced diabetic mice successfully lowered serum glucose. The results suggest that nanowarming will lead to a breakthrough in biobanking of islets for transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/btm2.10416

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/nbt.3889 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.08.010 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.12.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/cryo.1996.0044 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/313573a0 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.04.005 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.03.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4586 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41598-020-70707-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/sciadv.abe3005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/advs.202101691 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3109/02656736.2013.836758 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/srep00157 · DOI
  14. 10.1263/jbb.100.1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.026 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrendo.2016.178 · DOI
  17. 10.4161/org.5.3.9812 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0011-2240(87)90033-2 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0011-2240(87)90043-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1006/cryo.1993.1051 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/0011-2240(84)90048-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/096368979700600210 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s41591-022-01718-1 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/096368979600500306 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263005 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.04.004 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.012 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41598-021-89853-6 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.03.009 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/smll.201904290 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/advs.201901624 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1021/acsami.0c03222 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00330-002-1721-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1387/ijdb.041852tf · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.070 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0304-8853(95)00333-9 · DOI
  38. 10.3727/096368913X666412 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wakabayashi, T., Kaneko, M., Nakai, T., Horie, M., Fujimoto, H., Takahashi, M., Tanoue, S., & Ito, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Systems Engineering, School of Engineering Nagoya University Nagoya Japan
  • Radioisotope Research Center, Agency of Health, Safety and Environment Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
  • Technical Department Dai‐Ichi High Frequency Co., Ltd Kawasaki Japan
ORCID
Venue
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-27
Volume
8
Issue
4
ISSN
2380-6761
DOI
10.1002/btm2.10416
PMC
PMC10354753
Cited by
18
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review