Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vitrification and Nanowarming of Kidneys

Sharma, Anirudh, Rao, Joseph Sushil, Han, Zonghu, Gangwar, Lakshya, Namsrai, Baterdene, Gao, Zhe, Ring, Hattie L., Magnuson, Elliott, Etheridge, Michael, Wowk, Brian, Fahy, Gregory M., Garwood, Michael, Finger, Erik B., Bischof, John C.·2021·Advanced Science

Abstract

Vitrification can dramatically increase the storage of viable biomaterials in the cryogenic state for years. Unfortunately, vitrified systems ≥3 mL like large tissues and organs, cannot currently be rewarmed sufficiently rapidly or uniformly by convective approaches to avoid ice crystallization or cracking failures. A new volumetric rewarming technology entitled “nanowarming” addresses this problem by using radiofrequency excited iron oxide nanoparticles to rewarm vitrified systems rapidly and uniformly. Here, for the first time, successful recovery of a rat kidney from the vitrified state using nanowarming, is shown. First, kidneys are perfused via the renal artery with a cryoprotective cocktail (CPA) and silica‐coated iron oxide nanoparticles (sIONPs). After cooling at −40 °C min −1 in a controlled rate freezer, microcomputed tomography (µCT) imaging is used to verify the distribution of the sIONPs and the vitrified state of the kidneys. By applying a radiofrequency field to excite the distributed sIONPs, the vitrified kidneys are nanowarmed at a mean rate of 63.7 °C min −1 . Experiments and modeling show the avoidance of both ice crystallization and cracking during these processes. Histology and confocal imaging show that nanowarmed kidneys are dramatically better than convective rewarming controls. This work suggests that kidney nanowarming holds tremendous promise for transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.202101691

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.12.001 · DOI
  2. 10.7182/pit2013100 · DOI
  3. Tingle S. J., 2019, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 3
  4. 10.1111/ctr.13814 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003066 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41587-019-0223-y · DOI
  7. Fahy G. M., 1984, Cryobiology, 21, 8
  8. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4586 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.168.3934.939 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/73737 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.03.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1142/S2339547814500204 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1021/acsami.8b04496 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41598-020-70707-6 · DOI
  15. Xu Y., 2016, CryoLetters, 37, 448
  16. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.02.001 · DOI
  17. 10.1115/1.4032053 · DOI
  18. 10.1039/C9NR01182J · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/advs.201901624 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/sciadv.abe3005 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2003.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1006/cryo.1993.1051 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.4161/org.5.3.9974 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0011-2240(86)90006-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/mrm.28123 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/mrm.26394 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/cryo.1996.0044 · DOI
  28. H. A.Ecker E. C.Burdette F. L.Cain inIEEE 1976 Int. Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility1976 1. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Voss W. A. G., 1987, The Biophysics of Organ Cryopreservation
  30. 10.1016/0011-2240(87)90035-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1088/0031-9155/47/13/309 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1006/cryo.1993.1050 · DOI
  34. 10.1006/cryo.2000.2232 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0011-2240(90)90035-3 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03060 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/adhm.202000796 · DOI
  38. Ring H. L., 2019, eMagRes, 265
  39. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2009.05.007 · DOI
  40. Tong S., 2017, ACS Nano, 11, 7
  41. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.129 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1109/TMAG.2011.2162527 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10439-006-9176-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1161/01.HYP.31.1.440 · DOI
  46. 10.1152/ajprenal.00339.2017 · DOI
  47. 10.1089/bio.2018.0006 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/jat/13.1.57 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s10439-005-5364-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, A., Rao, J. S., Han, Z., Gangwar, L., Namsrai, B., Gao, Z., Ring, H. L., Magnuson, E., Etheridge, M., Wowk, B., Fahy, G. M., Garwood, M., Finger, E. B., & Bischof, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455 USA
  • Department of Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455 USA
  • Center for Magnetic Resonance Research Department of Radiology University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455 USA
  • 21st Century Medicine Inc Fontana CA 92336 USA
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-11
Volume
8
Issue
19
ISSN
2198-3844
Cited by
105
References
0
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (EEC 1941543)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review