Cited by 105Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Correlations of telomere length, telomerase activity, and telomeric‐repeat binding factor 1 expression in colorectal carcinoma: Prognostic indications

Open access
Garcia‐Aranda, Cristina, de Juan, Carmen, Diaz‐Lopez, Antonio, Sanchez‐Pernaute, Andres, Torres, Antonio‐Jose, Diaz‐Rubio, Eduardo, Balibrea, Jose‐Luis, Benito, Manuel +1 more·2006·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telomere maintenance has been proposed as an essential step for tumor cell immortalization. The objectives of the current study were to investigate the mechanisms implicated in telomere length in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and to evaluate the prognostic impact of telomere status. METHODS: Ninety‐one colorectal carcinoma samples that were obtained from patients who underwent surgery were analyzed to investigate the factors related to telomere function. The authors studied telomerase activity, terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length, and telomeric‐repeat binding factor (TRF1) expression and analyzed the prognostic implications of those factors. RESULTS: Most tumors (81.3%) displayed telomerase activity. Overall, telomeres in CRC specimens were significantly shorter compared with telomeres in normal, adjacent specimens (P = 0.02). Moreover, tumors that demonstrated shortened telomeres displayed higher TRF1 levels than tumors without telomere shortening. In relation to patient prognosis, a significantly poor clinical course was observed in the group of patients who had tumors with longer telomeres (P = 0.02), and this finding emerged as an independent prognostic factor in a Cox proportional hazards model (P = 0.04; relative risk, 6.48). Among patients with tumors classified as telomerase‐positive, telomere length ratios (the ratio of tumor tissues to normal tissues) ≤ 0.66 or TRF1 over‐expression conferred a favorable outcome (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of CRC specimens in the current study displayed telomerase reactivation. However, only those tumors that displayed telomere elongation conferred a poor prognosis. Conversely, colorectal tumors that over‐expressed TRF1 demonstrated telomere shortening, and patients with those tumors had a better clinical course. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.21625

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Telomerase activity in CRC has been detected in a significant percentage of tumor samples, ranging from 80% to 100%, highlighting its role as a pivotal step in CRC carcinogenesis.

    “TA in CRC has been detected in a significant percentage of tumor samples, ranging from 80% to 100% [201], highlighting its role as a pivotal step in CRC carcinogenesis [202].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Takagi S, Kinouchi Y, Hiwatashi N, et al. Telomere shorten- ing and the clinicopathologic characteristics of human colo- rectal carcinomas. Cancer. 1999;86:1431-1436.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia‐Aranda, C., de Juan, C., Diaz‐Lopez, A., Sanchez‐Pernaute, A., Torres, A., Diaz‐Rubio, E., Balibrea, J., Benito, M., & Iniesta, P.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Iniesta, Pilar
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-30
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
541-551
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1541149029
Cited by
105
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
telomere length, telomerase activity, TRF1, colorectal cancer, telomere shortening, telomere maintenance, prognostic factors, telomerase reactivation
MeSH terms
Aged, Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, Telomere, Telomerase, Telomeric Repeat Binding Protein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review