Cited by 66Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Paternal experience suppresses adult neurogenesis without altering hippocampal function in Peromyscus californicus

Glasper, Erica R., Kozorovitskiy, Yevgenia, Pavlic, Ashley, Gould, Elizabeth·2011·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Paternal care is rare among mammals, occurring in ≈6% of species. California mice (Peromyscus californicus) are unusual; fathers participate extensively in raising their young and display the same components of parental care as mothers, with the exception of nursing. Parenting is a complex experience, having stressful and enriching aspects. The hippocampus is sensitive to experience and responds to both stress and environmental enrichment with changes in structure and function. In rats, where females care exclusively for offspring, parenting is associated with suppressed hippocampal adult neurogenesis. Since this effect has been causally linked to lactation, it is unlikely that fathers would show a similar change. To investigate this issue, we examined adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of California mouse fathers compared to males without pups and observed reduced adult neurogenesis. Similar effects were found in California mouse mothers. Next, we investigated whether behaviors linked to the hippocampus, namely, object recognition and novelty-suppressed feeding, were altered in fathers, and observed no substantial changes. During caregiving, suppressed adult neurogenesis does not appear to be related to changes in behaviors associated with the hippocampus, although it is possible that there are other effects on hippocampal function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.22628

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parenting has suppressive effects on adult neurogenesis in both mothers and fathers.

    “In both mothers and fathers, parenting has suppressive effects on adult neurogenesis (Darnaudéry et al., 2007; Glasper et al., 2011; Hyer et al., 2016; Leuner et al., 2007; Pawluski and Galea, 2007; Mahmoud et al., 2016).”

    From Adult neurogenesis, glia, and the extracellular matrix (2019) · cites this paper as Glasper et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasper, E. R., Kozorovitskiy, Y., Pavlic, A., & Gould, E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Gould, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
519
Issue
11
Pages
2271-2281
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2166372596
Cited by
66
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (F32AG033461)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5 RO1 MH0597405)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
paternal care, adult neurogenesis, hippocampus, California mouse, Peromyscus californicus, parental behavior, maternal care, object recognition, novelty-suppressed feeding, stress, environmental enrichment, hippocampal function
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Paternal Behavior, Peromyscus, Social Behavior, Mice, Rats, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review